Leakage process and spontaneous ignition of hydrogen within a tube after releasing from the storage container with pressures up to 20 MPa

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ya-Long Du, Z.Y. Sun, Qin Huang
{"title":"Leakage process and spontaneous ignition of hydrogen within a tube after releasing from the storage container with pressures up to 20 MPa","authors":"Ya-Long Du, Z.Y. Sun, Qin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.11.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Albeit pressurized storage of gaseous hydrogen is the most common approach to hydrogen storage in the current industry, there is a risk of hydrogen leakage in current metal pipelines, following the potential of hydrogen spontaneous ignition during leakage. Under different burst pressures (from 4 MPa to 20 MPa, corresponding to the actual engineering pressure range in China’s current high/ultra-high-pressure pipelines), the present work investigates the leakage process of hydrogen within a tube by validated models. Hydrogen has been observed to spontaneously ignite when the burst pressure is no less than 4 MPa. The time to spontaneous ignition exponentially declines as burst pressure rises, but it can hardly be reduced to less than 10 μs since a period is required to prepare ignition conditions. Three modes of spontaneous ignition have been classified according to the locations at which initial flame kernels spontaneously appear. Mode I (burst pressure of fewer than 8 MPa) triggers spontaneous ignition near the tube’s wall, Mode III (burst pressure of more than 8 MPa) generates initial flame kernels at the tube’s central axis, while Mode II (burst pressure of 8 MPa) obtains the flame kernels at both locations. At lower burst pressures, the shockwave intensity alone cannot raise the hydrogen-air mixture's temperature to the ignition temperature; the help of boundary layer effects is essential to spontaneous ignition. At higher burst pressures, the shockwave intensity is dominant in raising the hydrogen-air mixture's temperature to reach the ignition condition. Furthermore, tulip flames expand rapidly under high-pressure conditions and form stable structures, indicating pressurized hydrogen exhibits a greater propensity for generating intense flames.","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"190 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.11.041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Albeit pressurized storage of gaseous hydrogen is the most common approach to hydrogen storage in the current industry, there is a risk of hydrogen leakage in current metal pipelines, following the potential of hydrogen spontaneous ignition during leakage. Under different burst pressures (from 4 MPa to 20 MPa, corresponding to the actual engineering pressure range in China’s current high/ultra-high-pressure pipelines), the present work investigates the leakage process of hydrogen within a tube by validated models. Hydrogen has been observed to spontaneously ignite when the burst pressure is no less than 4 MPa. The time to spontaneous ignition exponentially declines as burst pressure rises, but it can hardly be reduced to less than 10 μs since a period is required to prepare ignition conditions. Three modes of spontaneous ignition have been classified according to the locations at which initial flame kernels spontaneously appear. Mode I (burst pressure of fewer than 8 MPa) triggers spontaneous ignition near the tube’s wall, Mode III (burst pressure of more than 8 MPa) generates initial flame kernels at the tube’s central axis, while Mode II (burst pressure of 8 MPa) obtains the flame kernels at both locations. At lower burst pressures, the shockwave intensity alone cannot raise the hydrogen-air mixture's temperature to the ignition temperature; the help of boundary layer effects is essential to spontaneous ignition. At higher burst pressures, the shockwave intensity is dominant in raising the hydrogen-air mixture's temperature to reach the ignition condition. Furthermore, tulip flames expand rapidly under high-pressure conditions and form stable structures, indicating pressurized hydrogen exhibits a greater propensity for generating intense flames.
氢气从压力高达 20 兆帕的储存容器中释放出来后在管内的泄漏过程和自燃现象
尽管加压储存气态氢是目前工业中最常见的储氢方式,但在目前的金属管道中存在氢气泄漏的风险,在泄漏过程中可能发生氢气自燃。在不同的爆破压力下(从 4 兆帕到 20 兆帕,与中国目前高压/超高压管道的实际工程压力范围相对应),本研究通过验证模型研究了氢在管内的泄漏过程。据观测,当爆破压力不低于 4 兆帕时,氢气会自燃。随着爆破压力的升高,自燃时间呈指数下降,但由于需要一段时间来准备点火条件,自燃时间很难缩短到 10 μs 以下。根据初生火苗自发出现的位置,自发点火可分为三种模式。模式 I(爆破压力小于 8 兆帕)在管道壁附近引发自燃,模式 III(爆破压力大于 8 兆帕)在管道中轴线上产生初始焰核,而模式 II(爆破压力为 8 兆帕)则在两个位置都产生焰核。在较低的爆破压力下,仅靠冲击波强度无法将氢气-空气混合物的温度提高到点火温度;边界层效应对自发点火至关重要。在较高的爆破压力下,冲击波强度在提高氢气-空气混合物温度以达到点火条件方面起主导作用。此外,郁金香火焰在高压条件下迅速膨胀并形成稳定的结构,这表明加压氢气更容易产生强烈的火焰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信