Revealing the nitrogen and phosphorus removal potential: Insights into surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands employing integrated iron and sulfur electron donors
Azharuddin Chachar , Shanshan Sun , Yuanyuan Peng , Xushun Gu , Yu Zhang , Shengbing He
{"title":"Revealing the nitrogen and phosphorus removal potential: Insights into surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands employing integrated iron and sulfur electron donors","authors":"Azharuddin Chachar , Shanshan Sun , Yuanyuan Peng , Xushun Gu , Yu Zhang , Shengbing He","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the differences in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal performance, nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions, and microbial community structure between surface flow (SF) and subsurface flow (SSF) constructed wetlands (CWs) using iron scraps (ISs) and elemental sulfur (S<sup>0</sup>) as integrated electron donors. Four configurations were examined: control SFCW (SF-C), ISs and S<sup>0</sup> SFCW (SF-Fe+S), control SSFCW (SSF-C), and ISs and S<sup>0</sup> SSFCW (SSF-Fe+S). The results indicated that both CW types utilizing combined ISs and S<sup>0</sup> were effective in removing N, with SF-Fe+S (35.73–72.71 %) exhibiting higher nitrate removal efficiency compared to SSF-Fe+S (10.05–61.27 %). However, SSF-Fe+S (77.88–85.72 %) demonstrated a greater efficiency in removing total phosphorus (TP) than SF-Fe+S (50.78–67.91 %). In addition, both SSFCWs, SSF-C (7.22 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) and SSF-Fe+S (3.39 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) exhibited higher N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared to SFCWs, SF-C (3.05 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) and SF-Fe+S (1.94 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d). Microbial community analysis revealed distinct differences between CW types; <em>Dechloromonas</em> (22.45 %) and <em>Ferritrophicum</em> (18.23 %) were the dominant genera in SF-Fe+S, whereas <em>Ferritrophicum</em> (37.13 %) and <em>Acinetobacter</em> (21.80 %) predominated in SSF-Fe+S. In addition, TP removal was potentially enhanced by substrate adsorption and coprecipitation through iron (Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Fe<sup>3+</sup>) ions released from ISs corrosion reacting with phosphate (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>) ions. The study reveals that the type of CW and the combination of electron donors significantly influence their effectiveness in removing N and P, reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, and enhancing microbial community composition, thus providing valuable insights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 251-261"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024014666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the differences in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal performance, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and microbial community structure between surface flow (SF) and subsurface flow (SSF) constructed wetlands (CWs) using iron scraps (ISs) and elemental sulfur (S0) as integrated electron donors. Four configurations were examined: control SFCW (SF-C), ISs and S0 SFCW (SF-Fe+S), control SSFCW (SSF-C), and ISs and S0 SSFCW (SSF-Fe+S). The results indicated that both CW types utilizing combined ISs and S0 were effective in removing N, with SF-Fe+S (35.73–72.71 %) exhibiting higher nitrate removal efficiency compared to SSF-Fe+S (10.05–61.27 %). However, SSF-Fe+S (77.88–85.72 %) demonstrated a greater efficiency in removing total phosphorus (TP) than SF-Fe+S (50.78–67.91 %). In addition, both SSFCWs, SSF-C (7.22 mg/m2/d) and SSF-Fe+S (3.39 mg/m2/d) exhibited higher N2O emissions compared to SFCWs, SF-C (3.05 mg/m2/d) and SF-Fe+S (1.94 mg/m2/d). Microbial community analysis revealed distinct differences between CW types; Dechloromonas (22.45 %) and Ferritrophicum (18.23 %) were the dominant genera in SF-Fe+S, whereas Ferritrophicum (37.13 %) and Acinetobacter (21.80 %) predominated in SSF-Fe+S. In addition, TP removal was potentially enhanced by substrate adsorption and coprecipitation through iron (Fe2+ and Fe3+) ions released from ISs corrosion reacting with phosphate (PO43−) ions. The study reveals that the type of CW and the combination of electron donors significantly influence their effectiveness in removing N and P, reducing N2O emissions, and enhancing microbial community composition, thus providing valuable insights.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.