Cropping system modulates the effect of spring drought on ammonia-oxidizing communities

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Ari Fina Bintarti, Elena Kost, Dominika Kundel, Rafaela Feola Conz, Paul Mäder, Hans-Martin Krause, Jochen Mayer, Laurent Philippot, Martin Hartmann
{"title":"Cropping system modulates the effect of spring drought on ammonia-oxidizing communities","authors":"Ari Fina Bintarti, Elena Kost, Dominika Kundel, Rafaela Feola Conz, Paul Mäder, Hans-Martin Krause, Jochen Mayer, Laurent Philippot, Martin Hartmann","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The severity of drought is predicted to increase across Europe due to climate change. Droughts can substantially impact terrestrial nitrogen (N) cycling and the corresponding microbial communities. Here, we investigated how ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), archaea (AOA), and complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox) as well as inorganic N pools and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes respond to simulated drought under different cropping systems. A rain-out shelter experiment was conducted as part of a long-term field experiment comparing cropping systems that differed mainly in fertilization strategy (organic, mineral, or mixed mineral and organic) and plant protection management (biodynamic versus conventional pesticide use). We found that the effect of drought varied depending on the specific ammonia-oxidizing (AO) groups and the type of cropping system. Drought had the greatest impact on the structure of the AOA community compared to the other AO groups. The abundance of ammonia oxidizers was also affected by drought, with comammox clade B exhibiting the highest sensitivity. Additionally, drought had, overall, a stronger impact on the AO community structure in the biodynamic cropping system than in the mixed and mineral-fertilized conventional systems. The responses of ammonia-oxidizing communities to drought were comparable between bulk soil and rhizosphere. We observed a significant increase in NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> pools during the drought period, which then decreased after rewetting, indicating a strong resilience. We further found that drought altered the complex relationships between AO communities and mineral N pools, as well as N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. These results highlight the importance of agricultural management practices in influencing the response of nitrogen cycling guilds and their processes to drought.","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The severity of drought is predicted to increase across Europe due to climate change. Droughts can substantially impact terrestrial nitrogen (N) cycling and the corresponding microbial communities. Here, we investigated how ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), archaea (AOA), and complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox) as well as inorganic N pools and N2O fluxes respond to simulated drought under different cropping systems. A rain-out shelter experiment was conducted as part of a long-term field experiment comparing cropping systems that differed mainly in fertilization strategy (organic, mineral, or mixed mineral and organic) and plant protection management (biodynamic versus conventional pesticide use). We found that the effect of drought varied depending on the specific ammonia-oxidizing (AO) groups and the type of cropping system. Drought had the greatest impact on the structure of the AOA community compared to the other AO groups. The abundance of ammonia oxidizers was also affected by drought, with comammox clade B exhibiting the highest sensitivity. Additionally, drought had, overall, a stronger impact on the AO community structure in the biodynamic cropping system than in the mixed and mineral-fertilized conventional systems. The responses of ammonia-oxidizing communities to drought were comparable between bulk soil and rhizosphere. We observed a significant increase in NH4+ and NO3- pools during the drought period, which then decreased after rewetting, indicating a strong resilience. We further found that drought altered the complex relationships between AO communities and mineral N pools, as well as N2O fluxes. These results highlight the importance of agricultural management practices in influencing the response of nitrogen cycling guilds and their processes to drought.
种植系统调节春旱对氨氧化群落的影响
据预测,整个欧洲的干旱严重程度将因气候变化而加剧。干旱会严重影响陆地氮(N)循环和相应的微生物群落。在此,我们研究了氨氧化细菌(AOB)、古菌(AOA)、完全氨氧化剂(comammox)以及无机氮库和一氧化二氮通量在不同种植系统下如何应对模拟干旱。作为长期田间试验的一部分,我们进行了一次避雨试验,比较了主要在施肥策略(有机肥、矿物质肥或矿物质与有机肥混合施肥)和植保管理(生物动力施肥与常规农药使用)方面不同的耕作制度。我们发现,干旱的影响因特定的氨氧化(AO)群体和种植系统类型而异。与其他氨氧化物群相比,干旱对氨氧化物群落结构的影响最大。氨氧化剂的丰度也受到干旱的影响,Comammox 支系 B 的敏感性最高。此外,总体而言,干旱对生物动力耕作系统中的氨氧化物群落结构的影响要大于混合耕作系统和矿物肥料常规耕作系统。氨氧化群落对干旱的反应在块状土壤和根瘤层中具有可比性。我们观察到,在干旱期间,NH4+ 和 NO3- 池明显增加,复湿后又有所减少,这表明氨氧化群落具有很强的恢复能力。我们还发现,干旱改变了氧化亚氮群落和矿物氮库之间的复杂关系,以及氧化亚氮通量。这些结果凸显了农业管理方法在影响氮循环类群及其过程对干旱的响应方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信