Optimising physiotherapist delivery fidelity of exercise and physical activity advice for achilles tendinopathy: A prospective repeated-measures observational study.
Rebecca Phillips, Fernando Sousa, Sanam Tavakkoli Oskouei, Melanie Farlie, Dylan Morrissey, Peter Malliaras
{"title":"Optimising physiotherapist delivery fidelity of exercise and physical activity advice for achilles tendinopathy: A prospective repeated-measures observational study.","authors":"Rebecca Phillips, Fernando Sousa, Sanam Tavakkoli Oskouei, Melanie Farlie, Dylan Morrissey, Peter Malliaras","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess physiotherapist delivery fidelity and identify factors optimising delivery fidelity of an intervention based on recommended guidelines for Achilles tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective repeated-measures observational study of physiotherapist delivery fidelity with carefully defined exercise and physical activity advice.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An inter-disciplinary clinic in Melbourne, Australia, embedded in a randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two physiotherapists delivering the intervention to five participants each, at three timepoints.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>All participants were expected to receive the same intervention. Feedback at timepoint one, guided boost-training to optimise delivery fidelity.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Proportion of exercise and physical activity advice components delivered as intended (high ≥80%; moderate 51-79%; low≤50%), with relationships between variables analysed using chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physiotherapist delivery fidelity improved significantly between timepoint one and two (χ<sup>2</sup> = 83.3, p < 0.001), then sustained at timepoint three. At timepoint one, seven (70%) of intervention components were delivered with high fidelity, one (10%) with moderate fidelity and two (20%) with low fidelity. At timepoint two, after boost-training, nine (90%) were delivered with high fidelity and one (10%) with moderate fidelity. At timepoint three, all intervention components (100%) were delivered with high fidelity by both physiotherapists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapist delivery fidelity can be optimised with feedback, collaboration and boost-training.</p>","PeriodicalId":94171,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine","volume":"71 ","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To assess physiotherapist delivery fidelity and identify factors optimising delivery fidelity of an intervention based on recommended guidelines for Achilles tendinopathy.
Design: A prospective repeated-measures observational study of physiotherapist delivery fidelity with carefully defined exercise and physical activity advice.
Setting: An inter-disciplinary clinic in Melbourne, Australia, embedded in a randomised controlled trial.
Participants: Two physiotherapists delivering the intervention to five participants each, at three timepoints.
Intervention: All participants were expected to receive the same intervention. Feedback at timepoint one, guided boost-training to optimise delivery fidelity.
Main outcome measures: Proportion of exercise and physical activity advice components delivered as intended (high ≥80%; moderate 51-79%; low≤50%), with relationships between variables analysed using chi-square tests.
Results: Physiotherapist delivery fidelity improved significantly between timepoint one and two (χ2 = 83.3, p < 0.001), then sustained at timepoint three. At timepoint one, seven (70%) of intervention components were delivered with high fidelity, one (10%) with moderate fidelity and two (20%) with low fidelity. At timepoint two, after boost-training, nine (90%) were delivered with high fidelity and one (10%) with moderate fidelity. At timepoint three, all intervention components (100%) were delivered with high fidelity by both physiotherapists.
Conclusion: Physiotherapist delivery fidelity can be optimised with feedback, collaboration and boost-training.