Evaluation of flexural strength of additively manufactured resin materials compared to auto-polymerized provisional resin with and without hydrothermal aging.

Kübra Aycan Tavuz, Nadin Al-Haj Husain, Kiren Jan Mätzener, Mehmet Muzaffer Ateş, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Mutlu Özcan
{"title":"Evaluation of flexural strength of additively manufactured resin materials compared to auto-polymerized provisional resin with and without hydrothermal aging.","authors":"Kübra Aycan Tavuz, Nadin Al-Haj Husain, Kiren Jan Mätzener, Mehmet Muzaffer Ateş, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Mutlu Özcan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are used to fabricate 3D-printed provisional dental restorations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the flexural strength of 3D-printed resins and compare their mechanical performance with those of conventional resins indicated for provisional restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included six different 3D-printed resin materials, namely (Nextdent (ND); Temp PRINT (TP); Optiprint temp (OT); 3Delta Etemp (DE); Saremco print | CROWNTEC (SA); MED690 (ST)), and one conventional (Protemp (PT)) (Control) provisional resin material. Specimens (N = 168) were prepared (25x2x2 mm<sup>3</sup>) following ISO 10477:2018 guidelines for temporary materials using a printer (Asiga MAX 3D). Post-processing was accomplished following each manufacturer's recommendation. While half of the specimens were tested after 24 H without aging, the other half was subjected to thermomechanical aging in a custom-made chewing simulator (1.200.000 cycles, 5 °C and 55 °C). Flexural strength of the specimens was determined using a Universal Testing Machine. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Weibull modulus for each group was calculated based on parametric distribution analysis of censored data for maximum fracture load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in mean flexural strength (MPa) when non-aged and aged conditions were compared in the OT and PT groups (p>0.05). Groups ND, SA, TP, DE, and ST presented significant differences ranging between 12.67 and 57.39 MPa (p<0.05). All groups presented lower shape and scale values in aged groups compared to their non-aged counterparts. While OT and PT maintained their flexural strength after aging, ND exhibited the highest decrease (30%), followed by DE (23.8%), SA (16.2%), TP (12%), and ST (8.6%) in descending order. Weibull modulus decreased as a function of aging except in group ST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant effect of themomechanical aging especially on ND and DE materials should be considered with caution when such materials are indicated as interim or long-term interim provisional restorations. SA and TP exceeded the expectations from a provisional material compared to that of the conventional control material PT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials","volume":"161 ","pages":"106817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are used to fabricate 3D-printed provisional dental restorations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the flexural strength of 3D-printed resins and compare their mechanical performance with those of conventional resins indicated for provisional restorations.

Materials and methods: This study included six different 3D-printed resin materials, namely (Nextdent (ND); Temp PRINT (TP); Optiprint temp (OT); 3Delta Etemp (DE); Saremco print | CROWNTEC (SA); MED690 (ST)), and one conventional (Protemp (PT)) (Control) provisional resin material. Specimens (N = 168) were prepared (25x2x2 mm3) following ISO 10477:2018 guidelines for temporary materials using a printer (Asiga MAX 3D). Post-processing was accomplished following each manufacturer's recommendation. While half of the specimens were tested after 24 H without aging, the other half was subjected to thermomechanical aging in a custom-made chewing simulator (1.200.000 cycles, 5 °C and 55 °C). Flexural strength of the specimens was determined using a Universal Testing Machine. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Weibull modulus for each group was calculated based on parametric distribution analysis of censored data for maximum fracture load.

Results: No significant difference was observed in mean flexural strength (MPa) when non-aged and aged conditions were compared in the OT and PT groups (p>0.05). Groups ND, SA, TP, DE, and ST presented significant differences ranging between 12.67 and 57.39 MPa (p<0.05). All groups presented lower shape and scale values in aged groups compared to their non-aged counterparts. While OT and PT maintained their flexural strength after aging, ND exhibited the highest decrease (30%), followed by DE (23.8%), SA (16.2%), TP (12%), and ST (8.6%) in descending order. Weibull modulus decreased as a function of aging except in group ST.

Conclusion: Significant effect of themomechanical aging especially on ND and DE materials should be considered with caution when such materials are indicated as interim or long-term interim provisional restorations. SA and TP exceeded the expectations from a provisional material compared to that of the conventional control material PT.

与自动聚合临时树脂相比,评估加成制造树脂材料在水热老化和未水热老化情况下的抗弯强度。
目的:增材制造(AM)技术用于制造三维打印临时牙科修复体。本研究旨在调查三维打印树脂的抗弯强度,并将其机械性能与用于临时修复体的传统树脂进行比较:这项研究包括六种不同的三维打印树脂材料,即 Nextdent (ND);Temp PRINT (TP);Optiprint temp (OT);3Delta Etemp (DE);Saremco print | CROWNTEC (SA);MED690 (ST)),以及一种传统的临时树脂材料(Protemp (PT))。(对照组)临时树脂材料。使用打印机(Asiga MAX 3D)按照 ISO 10477:2018 临时材料指南制备试样(25x2x2 mm3)(N = 168)。后期处理按照各制造商的建议进行。一半试样在 24 小时后进行测试,不进行老化,另一半试样在定制的咀嚼模拟器中进行热机械老化(120 万次循环,5 °C 和 55 °C)。使用万能试验机测定试样的抗弯强度。数据分析采用双向方差分析和 Tukey 后检验(α = 0.05)。根据对最大断裂载荷的删减数据的参数分布分析,计算出各组的 Weibull 模量:在未老化和老化条件下,OT 组和 PT 组的平均抗折强度(兆帕)没有明显差异(p>0.05)。ND、SA、TP、DE 和 ST 组在 12.67 至 57.39 MPa 之间存在显著差异(p 结论:机械老化对平均抗弯强度(MPa)有显著影响:在将 ND 和 DE 材料用作临时或长期临时修复体时,应谨慎考虑其力学老化的重大影响,尤其是对 ND 和 DE 材料的影响。与传统对照材料 PT 相比,SA 和 TP 超出了对临时材料的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信