Diagnostic Confidence of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted MRI for the Detection of Brain Metastases: 3D FSE-vs. 3D GRE-Based Sequences.

Maria Gule-Monroe, Nathan Chasen, James P Long, Vinodh A Kumar, Komal Shah, Melissa Chen, Jason Stafford, Caroline Chung, Max Wintermark, Ping Hou, Ekta Sura, Chenyang Wang, Jeffrey Weinberg, Ho-Ling Liu
{"title":"Diagnostic Confidence of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted MRI for the Detection of Brain Metastases: 3D FSE-vs. 3D GRE-Based Sequences.","authors":"Maria Gule-Monroe, Nathan Chasen, James P Long, Vinodh A Kumar, Komal Shah, Melissa Chen, Jason Stafford, Caroline Chung, Max Wintermark, Ping Hou, Ekta Sura, Chenyang Wang, Jeffrey Weinberg, Ho-Ling Liu","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated the utility of contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted 3D fast spinecho-based SPACE sequences for brain metastasis detection on 3T MRI compared to gradient recalled-echo-based 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified all patients at a single institution who underwent SPACE and 3D FLASH sequences as part of a practice quality improvement project. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Five certified neuroradiologists reviewed the images, with at least 2 weeks separation between scoring sequences for the same patient. The following parameters were evaluated: number of metastatic lesions, number of indeterminate lesions, lesion margin, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), extent of image artifacts, and overall image quality. CNR was also quantified for solidly enhancing lesions > 1 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 220 patients who underwent SPACE and 3D FLASH sequences (the order of the sequences was equally distributed). Of these, 79 had brain metastases on imaging, and 7 were excluded; thus, 72 patients were included in the study. Twenty patients were scored by 2 radiologists. Out of the 92 evaluations, SPACE detected more lesions than did 3D FLASH in 35, while 3D FLASH detected more lesions in 10. More indeterminate lesions were seen on 3D FLASH (27) than on SPACE (9). For lesion margin, CNR, and overall image quality on a Likert scale, SPACE performed significantly better than did 3D FLASH, with less image artifacts (<i>P</i> < 0.00001). Higher quantitative CNRs were found on SPACE than on 3D FLASH images, although this result was not statistically significant (median = 22.9 vs. 15.5, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.134). There was a high inter-reader lesion detection concordance with Krippendorf's alpha ordinals at 0.962 for SPACE, 0.870 for 3D FLASH, and 0.918 for the two sequences combined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with 3D FLASH, the SPACE sequence detected more metastatic lesions and was rated higher for image quality, lesion margin, and CNR, with fewer artifacts. Importantly, the SPACE sequence resulted in increased reader confidence, with fewer indeterminate lesions detected.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>FLASH = fast low-angle shot; FSE = fast spin-echo; GRE = gradient-recalled echo; MP-RAGE = magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo; SPACE = Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolution; VIBE = volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: This retrospective study evaluated the utility of contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted 3D fast spinecho-based SPACE sequences for brain metastasis detection on 3T MRI compared to gradient recalled-echo-based 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence.

Materials and methods: We identified all patients at a single institution who underwent SPACE and 3D FLASH sequences as part of a practice quality improvement project. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Five certified neuroradiologists reviewed the images, with at least 2 weeks separation between scoring sequences for the same patient. The following parameters were evaluated: number of metastatic lesions, number of indeterminate lesions, lesion margin, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), extent of image artifacts, and overall image quality. CNR was also quantified for solidly enhancing lesions > 1 cm.

Results: We identified 220 patients who underwent SPACE and 3D FLASH sequences (the order of the sequences was equally distributed). Of these, 79 had brain metastases on imaging, and 7 were excluded; thus, 72 patients were included in the study. Twenty patients were scored by 2 radiologists. Out of the 92 evaluations, SPACE detected more lesions than did 3D FLASH in 35, while 3D FLASH detected more lesions in 10. More indeterminate lesions were seen on 3D FLASH (27) than on SPACE (9). For lesion margin, CNR, and overall image quality on a Likert scale, SPACE performed significantly better than did 3D FLASH, with less image artifacts (P < 0.00001). Higher quantitative CNRs were found on SPACE than on 3D FLASH images, although this result was not statistically significant (median = 22.9 vs. 15.5, respectively, P = 0.134). There was a high inter-reader lesion detection concordance with Krippendorf's alpha ordinals at 0.962 for SPACE, 0.870 for 3D FLASH, and 0.918 for the two sequences combined.

Conclusions: Compared with 3D FLASH, the SPACE sequence detected more metastatic lesions and was rated higher for image quality, lesion margin, and CNR, with fewer artifacts. Importantly, the SPACE sequence resulted in increased reader confidence, with fewer indeterminate lesions detected.

Abbreviations: FLASH = fast low-angle shot; FSE = fast spin-echo; GRE = gradient-recalled echo; MP-RAGE = magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo; SPACE = Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolution; VIBE = volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.

对比度增强 T1 加权磁共振成像在检测脑转移方面的诊断可信度:三维FSE与基于三维GRE的序列对比。
背景和目的:这项回顾性研究评估了基于对比增强(CE)T1加权三维快速脊柱回波的SPACE序列与基于梯度回波的三维快速低角度扫描(FLASH)序列在3T磁共振成像上检测脑转移瘤的实用性:作为实践质量改进项目的一部分,我们确定了一家医疗机构所有接受 SPACE 和三维 FLASH 序列检查的患者。我们对他们的病历进行了回顾性审查。五位经过认证的神经放射学专家对图像进行了审查,同一患者的两次评分序列之间至少间隔两周。对以下参数进行了评估:转移性病灶的数量、不确定病灶的数量、病灶边缘、对比-噪声比(CNR)、图像伪影程度和整体图像质量。对于大于 1 厘米的实性增强病灶,还对 CNR 进行了量化:我们确定了 220 名接受 SPACE 和 3D FLASH 序列检查的患者(序列顺序平均分配)。其中,79 名患者在成像中发现了脑转移灶,7 名患者被排除在外;因此,72 名患者被纳入研究。20 名患者由 2 名放射科医生进行评分。在 92 次评估中,SPACE 比 3D FLASH 检测出更多病变的有 35 例,而 3D FLASH 检测出更多病变的有 10 例。3D FLASH 发现的不确定病变(27 例)多于 SPACE(9 例)。就病灶边缘、CNR 和李克特量表的整体图像质量而言,SPACE 的表现明显优于 3D FLASH,图像伪影更少(P < 0.00001)。与 3D FLASH 图像相比,SPACE 图像的定量 CNR 更高,但这一结果没有统计学意义(中位数分别为 22.9 和 15.5,P = 0.134)。阅片者之间的病灶检测一致性很高,SPACE 的 Krippendorf's alpha 排序为 0.962,3D FLASH 为 0.870,两个序列的总和为 0.918:结论:与三维FLASH相比,SPACE序列能检测到更多的转移病灶,在图像质量、病灶边缘和CNR方面评分更高,伪影更少。重要的是,SPACE 序列增加了读者的信心,检测到的不确定病灶更少:缩写:FLASH = 快速低角度拍摄;FSE = 快速自旋回波;GRE = 梯度回波;MP-RAGE = 磁化预处理快速梯度回波;SPACE = 使用不同翻转角度进化的应用优化对比度取样完美;VIBE = 容积插值屏气检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信