Temporal Muscle Thickness Predicts Mortality and Disability in Older Adults Diagnosed with Mild Dementia.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
M G Borda, J Patricio Baldera, D Patino-Hernandez, E Westman, M U Pérez-Zepeda, F J Tarazona-Santabalbina, H Wakabayashi, H Arai, M Kivipelto, D Aarsland
{"title":"Temporal Muscle Thickness Predicts Mortality and Disability in Older Adults Diagnosed with Mild Dementia.","authors":"M G Borda, J Patricio Baldera, D Patino-Hernandez, E Westman, M U Pérez-Zepeda, F J Tarazona-Santabalbina, H Wakabayashi, H Arai, M Kivipelto, D Aarsland","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcopenia contributes to increased hospitalizations, cognitive impairment, falls, and all-cause mortality. Current diagnostic methods, like body Magnetic Resonance Imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, are costly and impractical. Notably, there is no standardized approach for assessing sarcopenia in dementia clinics. We studied the association of temporal muscle thickness (TMT) with key prognostic factors in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body dementia (DLB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from the DemVest, a longitudinal cohort study, and included participants clinically diagnosed with mild AD or DLB. TMT was measured using baseline MRI scans. The main outcome measures were cognition, functional performance, malnutrition, and mortality. Various demographic and clinical factors were considered as potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AD sample was mainly composed by females(76.9%), age 75.5(SD 6.95). The DLB sample was mostly composed by men(63.6%), age 75.8(SD 6.85). At baseline TMT showed significant association with cognitive performance in the DLB group (Est.=0.593, p-value=0.049). The longitudinal analysis revealed significant associations between TMT and functional decline in DLB (Est.=-0.123, p-value 0.007) and increased mortality in the whole sample(HR=0.815, p-value 0.002), the AD group (HR=0.834 p-value=0.031), and the DLB group (HR=0.767 p-value=0.019) respectively. These associations remained significant after adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TMT measurement was associated with mortality in both dementia groups as well as with cognition and function in DLB. TMT emerges as a cost-efficient measure of muscle mass indicating clinical relevance and utility in healthcare settings. Implementing TMT assessment could improve patient care and aid in identifying individuals at risk of adverse outcomes in mild dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"441-447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia contributes to increased hospitalizations, cognitive impairment, falls, and all-cause mortality. Current diagnostic methods, like body Magnetic Resonance Imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, are costly and impractical. Notably, there is no standardized approach for assessing sarcopenia in dementia clinics. We studied the association of temporal muscle thickness (TMT) with key prognostic factors in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body dementia (DLB).

Methods: We utilized data from the DemVest, a longitudinal cohort study, and included participants clinically diagnosed with mild AD or DLB. TMT was measured using baseline MRI scans. The main outcome measures were cognition, functional performance, malnutrition, and mortality. Various demographic and clinical factors were considered as potential confounders.

Results: The AD sample was mainly composed by females(76.9%), age 75.5(SD 6.95). The DLB sample was mostly composed by men(63.6%), age 75.8(SD 6.85). At baseline TMT showed significant association with cognitive performance in the DLB group (Est.=0.593, p-value=0.049). The longitudinal analysis revealed significant associations between TMT and functional decline in DLB (Est.=-0.123, p-value 0.007) and increased mortality in the whole sample(HR=0.815, p-value 0.002), the AD group (HR=0.834 p-value=0.031), and the DLB group (HR=0.767 p-value=0.019) respectively. These associations remained significant after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusions: The TMT measurement was associated with mortality in both dementia groups as well as with cognition and function in DLB. TMT emerges as a cost-efficient measure of muscle mass indicating clinical relevance and utility in healthcare settings. Implementing TMT assessment could improve patient care and aid in identifying individuals at risk of adverse outcomes in mild dementia.

颞肌厚度可预测被诊断为轻度痴呆症的老年人的死亡率和残疾程度。
背景:肌肉疏松症会导致住院、认知障碍、跌倒和全因死亡率增加。目前的诊断方法,如人体磁共振成像和双能 X 射线吸收测量法,既昂贵又不实用。值得注意的是,目前在痴呆症诊所还没有评估肌肉疏松症的标准化方法。我们研究了颞肌厚度(TMT)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)和路易体痴呆症(DLB)患者主要预后因素的关联:我们利用纵向队列研究 DemVest 的数据,纳入了临床诊断为轻度 AD 或 DLB 的参与者。TMT通过基线磁共振成像扫描进行测量。主要结果指标包括认知能力、功能表现、营养不良和死亡率。各种人口统计学和临床因素被视为潜在的混杂因素:AD样本主要由女性组成(76.9%),年龄为75.5岁(SD 6.95)。DLB样本中男性居多(63.6%),年龄为75.8岁(SD 6.85)。基线时,TMT 与 DLB 组的认知表现有显著关联(Est.=0.593,P 值=0.049)。纵向分析显示,TMT与DLB功能衰退(Est.=-0.123,P值0.007)和死亡率增加之间存在显著关联,分别出现在全样本(HR=0.815,P值0.002)、AD组(HR=0.834,P值=0.031)和DLB组(HR=0.767,P值=0.019)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,这些相关性仍然显著:结论:TMT测量与两组痴呆症患者的死亡率以及DLB患者的认知和功能相关。TMT是一种具有成本效益的肌肉质量测量方法,在医疗机构中具有临床相关性和实用性。实施 TMT 评估可改善患者护理,并有助于识别轻度痴呆症患者中面临不良后果风险的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信