Five-Time Sit-To-Stand Lower Limb Muscle Power in Older Women: An Explorative, Descriptive and Comparative Analysis.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
H J Coelho-Júnior, A Álvarez-Bustos, L Rodríguez-Mañas, I de Oliveira Gonçalves, R Calvani, A Picca, M C Uchida, S da Silva Aguiar, E Marzetti
{"title":"Five-Time Sit-To-Stand Lower Limb Muscle Power in Older Women: An Explorative, Descriptive and Comparative Analysis.","authors":"H J Coelho-Júnior, A Álvarez-Bustos, L Rodríguez-Mañas, I de Oliveira Gonçalves, R Calvani, A Picca, M C Uchida, S da Silva Aguiar, E Marzetti","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle power assessment entails the use of complex equipment which impacts its clinical applicability. Recently, equations to estimate lower-limb muscle power measures based on 5-repetition sit-to-stand (5STS) performance and anthropometric parameters were validated. However, their ability to discriminate physical performance status in older adults is still unknown. Moreover, the analysis of the biomechanical aspects of 5STS might represent a valid instrument to identify people with different physical statuses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Explore and examine the biomechanical aspects of 5STS performance, and compare the capacity of this measure and 5STS muscle power equations to discriminate older women with different physical function levels.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Older women.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>5STS using a linear encoder, Timed \"Up-andGo\" (TUG), isometric handgrip strength (IHG) and walking speed (WS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from ANOVA analysis indicated that peak concentric muscle power was reached in the first 5STS repetition and then declined significantly (P= 0.006). When participants were divided in high and low physical performance groups according to median results of TUG, IHG and WS tests, significant differences in 5STS biomechanical aspects were observed, according to independent t-test results (P< 0.05). However, no differences were found for 5STS muscle power equations. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated that 5STS biomechanical aspects (P< 0.05), but not 5STS muscle power equations, were significantly associated with physical performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of the present study suggest that 5STS biomechanical aspects might contribute to discriminating older women with high and low physical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"397-404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Muscle power assessment entails the use of complex equipment which impacts its clinical applicability. Recently, equations to estimate lower-limb muscle power measures based on 5-repetition sit-to-stand (5STS) performance and anthropometric parameters were validated. However, their ability to discriminate physical performance status in older adults is still unknown. Moreover, the analysis of the biomechanical aspects of 5STS might represent a valid instrument to identify people with different physical statuses.

Objectives: Explore and examine the biomechanical aspects of 5STS performance, and compare the capacity of this measure and 5STS muscle power equations to discriminate older women with different physical function levels.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Community.

Participants: Older women.

Measurements: 5STS using a linear encoder, Timed "Up-andGo" (TUG), isometric handgrip strength (IHG) and walking speed (WS).

Results: Results from ANOVA analysis indicated that peak concentric muscle power was reached in the first 5STS repetition and then declined significantly (P= 0.006). When participants were divided in high and low physical performance groups according to median results of TUG, IHG and WS tests, significant differences in 5STS biomechanical aspects were observed, according to independent t-test results (P< 0.05). However, no differences were found for 5STS muscle power equations. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated that 5STS biomechanical aspects (P< 0.05), but not 5STS muscle power equations, were significantly associated with physical performance.

Conclusion: Findings of the present study suggest that 5STS biomechanical aspects might contribute to discriminating older women with high and low physical performance.

老年妇女五次坐立的下肢肌肉力量:探索性、描述性和比较性分析。
背景:肌肉力量评估需要使用复杂的设备,这影响了其临床适用性。最近,基于 5 次重复坐立(5STS)表现和人体测量参数的下肢肌肉力量估算公式得到了验证。然而,它们对老年人体能状况的判别能力仍是未知数。此外,对 5STS 的生物力学方面进行分析可能是识别不同体能状况人群的有效工具:探索和研究 5STS 性能的生物力学方面,并比较该指标和 5STS 肌肉力量方程在区分不同身体功能水平的老年妇女方面的能力:设计:横断面研究:参与者:老年妇女测量测量方法:使用线性编码器进行 5STS 测量、定时 "上-下"(TUG)测量、等长手握力(IHG)测量和步行速度(WS)测量:方差分析结果表明,在第一次重复 5STS 时,同心肌力达到峰值,随后明显下降(P= 0.006)。根据 TUG、IHG 和 WS 测试结果的中位数将参与者分为高体能组和低体能组,独立 t 检验结果表明,5STS 生物力学方面存在显著差异(PC 结论:本研究结果表明,5STS 的生物力学方面存在显著差异:本研究结果表明,5STS 生物力学方面可能有助于区分体能高和体能低的老年妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信