Health professions students' acceptance and readiness for learning analytics: lessons for educators.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Farida Hussan, Hui Meng Er, Vishna Devi Nadarajah
{"title":"Health professions students' acceptance and readiness for learning analytics: lessons for educators.","authors":"Farida Hussan, Hui Meng Er, Vishna Devi Nadarajah","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06284-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning analytics (LA) is a tool for gathering, analysing, and interpreting data related to student's learning behaviour, engagement, and performance. As the student data collected by the institutions are used to construct LA, it is essential to understand the acceptance and readiness of the students regarding the implementation of LA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sequential mixed method research design was used in this study. A validated questionnaire was distributed to undergraduate students of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmacy programmes to collect their general views on LA. Focus group interviews with a total of 18 students were conducted to explore their perceptions in depth, followed by thematic analysis of the transcribed data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generally, the students were aware of their demographic data, utilisation of learning management system and academic performance data being collected by the university. They were agreeable for collection of those data which had direct association with their learning to be used for LA. However, they expressed concerns about the privacy, confidentiality, and security of the collected data. Three themes emerged from the interviews, i.e., self-regulated learning, evidence-based decision making and data management. The students perceived that LA could help them to monitor achievement of learning outcomes and provide support for individualised learning paths through recommendations of learning resources and learning motivation. They also opined that LA could help educators and institutions by providing feedback on teaching and learning methods, resource allocation and interventions to create conducive learning environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA is a useful tool to support self-regulated learning, however, precautions should be exercised during implementation to ensure data privacy and security.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"1347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06284-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Learning analytics (LA) is a tool for gathering, analysing, and interpreting data related to student's learning behaviour, engagement, and performance. As the student data collected by the institutions are used to construct LA, it is essential to understand the acceptance and readiness of the students regarding the implementation of LA.

Methods: A sequential mixed method research design was used in this study. A validated questionnaire was distributed to undergraduate students of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmacy programmes to collect their general views on LA. Focus group interviews with a total of 18 students were conducted to explore their perceptions in depth, followed by thematic analysis of the transcribed data.

Results: Generally, the students were aware of their demographic data, utilisation of learning management system and academic performance data being collected by the university. They were agreeable for collection of those data which had direct association with their learning to be used for LA. However, they expressed concerns about the privacy, confidentiality, and security of the collected data. Three themes emerged from the interviews, i.e., self-regulated learning, evidence-based decision making and data management. The students perceived that LA could help them to monitor achievement of learning outcomes and provide support for individualised learning paths through recommendations of learning resources and learning motivation. They also opined that LA could help educators and institutions by providing feedback on teaching and learning methods, resource allocation and interventions to create conducive learning environment.

Conclusions: LA is a useful tool to support self-regulated learning, however, precautions should be exercised during implementation to ensure data privacy and security.

卫生专业学生对学习分析的接受程度和准备程度:给教育工作者的启示。
背景:学习分析(LA)是一种收集、分析和解释与学生的学习行为、参与度和表现相关的数据的工具。由于院校收集的学生数据用于构建学习分析,因此了解学生对实施学习分析的接受程度和准备情况至关重要:本研究采用了顺序混合法研究设计。向医学、牙科和药学专业的本科生发放了一份经过验证的调查问卷,以收集他们对 "法律咨询 "的总体看法。对 18 名学生进行了焦点小组访谈,以深入探讨他们的看法,然后对转录的数据进行了专题分析:结果:总体而言,学生们都知道学校会收集他们的人口统计数据、学习管理系统的使用情况和学习成绩数据。他们同意收集与他们的学习有直接关系的数据,并将其用于学习管理系统。不过,他们对所收集数据的私密性、保密性和安全性表示担忧。访谈中出现了三个主题,即自我调节学习、循证决策和数据管理。学生认为,学习资源库可帮助他们监测学习成果的实现情况,并通过推荐学习资源和学习动机,为个性化学习路径提供支持。他们还认为,LA 可以帮助教育工作者和教育机构就教学方法、资源分配和干预措施提供反馈,从而创造有利的学习环境:学习资源库是支持自我调节学习的有用工具,但在实施过程中应采取预防措施,以确保数据隐私和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信