Pei-Yao Zhai, Xiao Zang, Ting Jiang, Jian Feng, Bin Zhang, Lei Zhang, Zhi-Xian Chen, Yan-Lin Zhao, Gang Qin
{"title":"Health and Economic Impacts of Introducing Vaccae and Enhanced Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Management Strategies in China.","authors":"Pei-Yao Zhai, Xiao Zang, Ting Jiang, Jian Feng, Bin Zhang, Lei Zhang, Zhi-Xian Chen, Yan-Lin Zhao, Gang Qin","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>China faces high burden of multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We aimed to evaluate the impacts of Vaccae vaccination and enhanced drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a compartmental model calibrated with national TB data, we evaluated 9 interventions: enhanced DR-TB management (S1); Vaccae vaccination for those with latent TB infection, targeting specific age groups (S2: adolescents, S3: adolescents and young adults, S4: working-age adults, S5: elderly); and combined strategies S6-S9. Vaccae's efficacy was 0.547 for the first 5 years, then waning annually. Costs were US$28/dose for Vaccae, US$87/test for Xpert MTB/RIF, and US$13 818/course for BPaLM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strategy S1 is projected to reduce MDR/RR-TB incidence and mortality by 21% (95% UI, 8%-46%) and 54% (38%-67%), respectively, by 2050. Strategy S9 (S5+S1) is more effective, reducing the incidence by 44% (35%-61%) and mortality by 68% (52%-78%), with an ICER of US$7222 (4460-10 779) per DALY averted compared with S1. Additionally, S9 could prevent 24.2 (13.5-32.9) million patient-months of second-line treatment from 2025 to 2050.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prioritizing Vaccae vaccination for the elderly and enhancing DR-TB management offer a promising and cost-effective opportunity for China. The findings may have policy implications for other low- and middle-income countries with high MDR/RR-TB burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1271-1280"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: China faces high burden of multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We aimed to evaluate the impacts of Vaccae vaccination and enhanced drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) management strategies.
Methods: Using a compartmental model calibrated with national TB data, we evaluated 9 interventions: enhanced DR-TB management (S1); Vaccae vaccination for those with latent TB infection, targeting specific age groups (S2: adolescents, S3: adolescents and young adults, S4: working-age adults, S5: elderly); and combined strategies S6-S9. Vaccae's efficacy was 0.547 for the first 5 years, then waning annually. Costs were US$28/dose for Vaccae, US$87/test for Xpert MTB/RIF, and US$13 818/course for BPaLM.
Results: Strategy S1 is projected to reduce MDR/RR-TB incidence and mortality by 21% (95% UI, 8%-46%) and 54% (38%-67%), respectively, by 2050. Strategy S9 (S5+S1) is more effective, reducing the incidence by 44% (35%-61%) and mortality by 68% (52%-78%), with an ICER of US$7222 (4460-10 779) per DALY averted compared with S1. Additionally, S9 could prevent 24.2 (13.5-32.9) million patient-months of second-line treatment from 2025 to 2050.
Conclusions: Prioritizing Vaccae vaccination for the elderly and enhancing DR-TB management offer a promising and cost-effective opportunity for China. The findings may have policy implications for other low- and middle-income countries with high MDR/RR-TB burden.
期刊介绍:
Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.