Effectiveness of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on professional activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
{"title":"Effectiveness of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on professional activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Dédrie Zettor , Francky Teddy Endomba , Achille Pierandrei , Jean-Michel Pinoit , Jean-Christophe Chauvet-Gelinier , Nathalie Forestier , Aymard Hussami","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This meta-analytic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) on professional activity.</div><div>We systematically explored PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO until August 2023. We targeted randomized controlled trials using dCBT-I and assessing professional activity. We used the standardized mean difference (SMD), and the Der Simonian-Laird random effects model, and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</div><div>From the 494 papers initially identified, 11 were finally selected, including 4723 participants from Europe, Japan, and North America. People treated with dCBT-I had lower scores for work-related rumination (SMD = −3.28; 95 % CI: −6.18; −0.39), lower costs of lost productivity due to presenteeism (SMD = −0.55; 95 % CI: −0.77; −0.33), and lower presenteeism scores (SMD = −1.05; 95 % CI: −1.79; −0.31). Three studies displayed a high risk of bias, while eight were classified as “some concern”. Publication bias could not be assessed due to the small number of studies, and the certainty of evidence was low or very low.</div><div>This review provides positive results regarding the effectiveness of dCBT-I on the professional activity of people with insomnia symptoms or disorder. However, further studies are needed to reinforce our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102024"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108707922400128X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This meta-analytic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) on professional activity.
We systematically explored PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO until August 2023. We targeted randomized controlled trials using dCBT-I and assessing professional activity. We used the standardized mean difference (SMD), and the Der Simonian-Laird random effects model, and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
From the 494 papers initially identified, 11 were finally selected, including 4723 participants from Europe, Japan, and North America. People treated with dCBT-I had lower scores for work-related rumination (SMD = −3.28; 95 % CI: −6.18; −0.39), lower costs of lost productivity due to presenteeism (SMD = −0.55; 95 % CI: −0.77; −0.33), and lower presenteeism scores (SMD = −1.05; 95 % CI: −1.79; −0.31). Three studies displayed a high risk of bias, while eight were classified as “some concern”. Publication bias could not be assessed due to the small number of studies, and the certainty of evidence was low or very low.
This review provides positive results regarding the effectiveness of dCBT-I on the professional activity of people with insomnia symptoms or disorder. However, further studies are needed to reinforce our findings.
期刊介绍:
Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels.
Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine.
The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.