The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amir Bazrafshan, Moein Fahimy, Hamid Reza Farpour, Amin Sayyadi, Alireza Heiran
{"title":"The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Amir Bazrafshan, Moein Fahimy, Hamid Reza Farpour, Amin Sayyadi, Alireza Heiran","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2426309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) are major sources of socioeconomic burdens and are still rising globally. SCIs also cause several personal sufferings in both physical and psychological aspects. Individuals' reactions following a traumatic incident can vary based on the severity and nature of the damage, as well as their psychological dispositions. Locus of control (an individual's belief in his/her ability to control the outcome of events surrounding them) is an important factor in determining individuals' quality of life (QoL) in the aftermath of an incident.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association between locus of control and general health in patients with lumbar SCI. This study was carried out on 108 patients with lumbar SCI using the Rotter's Locus of Control Scale and the General Health questionnaires, as well as demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with an internal locus of control had a significantly better general health score than those with an external locus of control (32 vs. 38.5; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). There was a moderate positive correlation between general health and locus of control score (R = 0.575; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Also, employed patients had a significantly more internal locus of control score compared to unemployed patients (7 vs. 8; <i>P</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scores of locus of control and general health are significantly correlated, and internal locus of control could lead to better general mental health in patients with lumbar SCI. Although there is a need for more studies with better study designs to approve of this association, the results of this study emphasize the importance of interventions targeting locus of control, improving socio-economic conditions, and rehabilitation measures in improving the general health of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2426309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) are major sources of socioeconomic burdens and are still rising globally. SCIs also cause several personal sufferings in both physical and psychological aspects. Individuals' reactions following a traumatic incident can vary based on the severity and nature of the damage, as well as their psychological dispositions. Locus of control (an individual's belief in his/her ability to control the outcome of events surrounding them) is an important factor in determining individuals' quality of life (QoL) in the aftermath of an incident.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association between locus of control and general health in patients with lumbar SCI. This study was carried out on 108 patients with lumbar SCI using the Rotter's Locus of Control Scale and the General Health questionnaires, as well as demographic data.

Results: Patients with an internal locus of control had a significantly better general health score than those with an external locus of control (32 vs. 38.5; P < 0.0001). There was a moderate positive correlation between general health and locus of control score (R = 0.575; P < 0.0001). Also, employed patients had a significantly more internal locus of control score compared to unemployed patients (7 vs. 8; P = 0.004).

Conclusion: Scores of locus of control and general health are significantly correlated, and internal locus of control could lead to better general mental health in patients with lumbar SCI. Although there is a need for more studies with better study designs to approve of this association, the results of this study emphasize the importance of interventions targeting locus of control, improving socio-economic conditions, and rehabilitation measures in improving the general health of these patients.

腰部脊髓损伤患者的控制感与一般心理健康之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:脊髓损伤(SCIs)是社会经济负担的主要来源,在全球范围内仍呈上升趋势。脊髓损伤也会在生理和心理两方面给个人带来一些痛苦。创伤事件发生后,个人的反应会因损伤的严重程度和性质以及心理倾向而有所不同。控制感(个人对自己有能力控制周围事件结果的信念)是决定个人在事件发生后生活质量(QoL)的重要因素:我们进行了一项横断面研究,调查腰椎 SCI 患者的控制感与一般健康之间的关系。这项研究使用罗特控制中心量表和一般健康状况问卷以及人口统计学数据对 108 名腰椎间盘突出症患者进行了调查:结果:内部控制感患者的一般健康评分明显高于外部控制感患者(32 分对 38.5 分;P P = 0.004):结论:控制感得分与一般健康状况明显相关,内部控制感可改善腰椎间盘突出症患者的一般心理健康。尽管还需要更多研究和更好的研究设计来证实这种相关性,但本研究的结果强调了针对控制位置、改善社会经济条件和康复措施的干预措施对改善这些患者一般健康状况的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信