Impact of scaling up health intervention coverage on reducing maternal mortality in 26 low- and middle-income countries: A modelling study.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xi-Ru Guo, Yue-Long Ji, Shi-Yu Yan, Ting Shi, Kanittha Chamroonsawasdi, Jue Liu, Hai-Jun Wang
{"title":"Impact of scaling up health intervention coverage on reducing maternal mortality in 26 low- and middle-income countries: A modelling study.","authors":"Xi-Ru Guo, Yue-Long Ji, Shi-Yu Yan, Ting Shi, Kanittha Chamroonsawasdi, Jue Liu, Hai-Jun Wang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prioritising actions is urgently needed to address the stagnation of the global maternal mortality ratio (MMR). As most maternal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), we aimed to assess the impact of scaling up health intervention coverage on reducing MMR under four scenarios for 26 LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a modelling study to estimate the MMR and additional maternal lives saved by intervention by 2030 for 26 LMICs using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). We used four scenarios to assess the impact of scaling up health intervention coverage by no scale-up (no change), modest scale-up (increased by 2% per year), substantial scale-up (increased by 5% per year), and universal coverage (coverage reached 95% by 2030). We divided the selected 26 countries into three groups according to their MMR levels in 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 26 LMICs, six (23.1%) countries showed an increase in MMRs and 13 (50.0%) stalled on the reduction of MMR from 2015 to 2020. Under a substantial scale-up of coverage or scaling up to universal coverage, the average MMR in 2030 of 26 LMICs would be 62.8 or 52.8, reaching the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.1. Caesarean delivery, uterotonics for postpartum haemorrhage, and assisted vaginal delivery had a more important role in this reduction compared to other interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scaling up the coverage of health interventions is critical for reducing MMRs. If a substantial scale-up or scaling up to universal coverage of continuous maternity interventions from preconception to postpartum period can be achieved, LMICs in Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions could reach the SDG 3.1 on time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04221"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prioritising actions is urgently needed to address the stagnation of the global maternal mortality ratio (MMR). As most maternal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), we aimed to assess the impact of scaling up health intervention coverage on reducing MMR under four scenarios for 26 LMICs.

Methods: We conducted a modelling study to estimate the MMR and additional maternal lives saved by intervention by 2030 for 26 LMICs using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). We used four scenarios to assess the impact of scaling up health intervention coverage by no scale-up (no change), modest scale-up (increased by 2% per year), substantial scale-up (increased by 5% per year), and universal coverage (coverage reached 95% by 2030). We divided the selected 26 countries into three groups according to their MMR levels in 2020.

Results: Among 26 LMICs, six (23.1%) countries showed an increase in MMRs and 13 (50.0%) stalled on the reduction of MMR from 2015 to 2020. Under a substantial scale-up of coverage or scaling up to universal coverage, the average MMR in 2030 of 26 LMICs would be 62.8 or 52.8, reaching the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.1. Caesarean delivery, uterotonics for postpartum haemorrhage, and assisted vaginal delivery had a more important role in this reduction compared to other interventions.

Conclusions: Scaling up the coverage of health interventions is critical for reducing MMRs. If a substantial scale-up or scaling up to universal coverage of continuous maternity interventions from preconception to postpartum period can be achieved, LMICs in Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions could reach the SDG 3.1 on time.

在 26 个中低收入国家扩大保健干预覆盖面对降低孕产妇死亡率的影响:模拟研究。
背景:要解决全球孕产妇死亡率(MMR)停滞不前的问题,迫切需要优先采取行动。由于大多数孕产妇死亡发生在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),我们旨在评估在 26 个低收入和中等收入国家的四种情况下扩大医疗干预覆盖面对降低孕产妇死亡率的影响:方法:我们开展了一项建模研究,利用 "挽救生命工具"(LiST)估算了 26 个低收入和中等收入国家到 2030 年的孕产妇死亡率和干预措施挽救的额外孕产妇生命。我们采用了四种方案来评估扩大卫生干预覆盖面的影响,即不扩大(不变)、适度扩大(每年增加 2%)、大幅扩大(每年增加 5%)和全面覆盖(到 2030 年覆盖率达到 95%)。我们根据选定的 26 个国家在 2020 年的 MMR 水平将其分为三组:结果:在 26 个低收入和中等收入国家中,有 6 个国家(23.1%)的产妇死亡率有所上升,13 个国家(50.0%)在 2015 年至 2020 年期间产妇死亡率的下降方面停滞不前。在大幅扩大覆盖范围或扩大到全民覆盖的情况下,26 个低收入和中等收入国家 2030 年的平均产妇死亡率将为 62.8 或 52.8,从而实现可持续发展目标 3.1。与其他干预措施相比,剖腹产、治疗产后出血的子宫收缩剂和阴道助产在降低产妇死亡率方面发挥了更重要的作用:扩大医疗干预措施的覆盖范围对于降低产妇死亡率至关重要。如果能够实现从孕前到产后持续性孕产妇干预措施的大幅扩大或普及,东南亚和西太平洋地区的低收入和中等收入国家就能按时实现可持续发展目标 3.1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信