Manuela von Sneidern, Arman Saeedi, Audrey M Abend, Ethan Wiener, Silas W Smith, Danielle F Eytan
{"title":"Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Facial Palsy: Opportunities for Optimization at a Single Institution.","authors":"Manuela von Sneidern, Arman Saeedi, Audrey M Abend, Ethan Wiener, Silas W Smith, Danielle F Eytan","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Most patients with acute facial palsy initially present to emergency departments (EDs), where clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend steroids, eye care, and follow-up with facial nerve specialists. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate adherence to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Bell's palsy (BP) CPGs within EDs at a single academic institution. <b>Method</b>: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with acute facial palsy in the EDs of an academic tertiary care center between June 1, 2021, and June 1, 2022. <b>Results:</b> A total of 270 patients met inclusion criteria; most were male (<i>n</i> = 150, 55.9%), diagnosed with BP (<i>n</i> = 243, 90.0%), and presented to community-based emergency rooms (<i>n</i> = 170, 62.96). Although most patients received steroid treatment (<i>n</i> = 243, 90.0%), only 61.5% (<i>n</i> = 166) received the AAO-HNS-recommended course. Older patients and those who received steroids were more likely to receive imaging (<i>p</i> < 0.001<i>, p =</i> 0.03). Treatment with the AAO-HNS-recommended steroid regimen was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving laboratory evaluation (<i>p =</i> 0.02). Providers often advised follow-up; however, only 12.2% of patients were discharged with an electronic referral order. <b>Conclusion</b>: There are opportunities to standardize the treatment of patients in the ED presenting with acute facial palsy according to AAO-HNS CPGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Most patients with acute facial palsy initially present to emergency departments (EDs), where clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend steroids, eye care, and follow-up with facial nerve specialists. Objective: To evaluate adherence to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Bell's palsy (BP) CPGs within EDs at a single academic institution. Method: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with acute facial palsy in the EDs of an academic tertiary care center between June 1, 2021, and June 1, 2022. Results: A total of 270 patients met inclusion criteria; most were male (n = 150, 55.9%), diagnosed with BP (n = 243, 90.0%), and presented to community-based emergency rooms (n = 170, 62.96). Although most patients received steroid treatment (n = 243, 90.0%), only 61.5% (n = 166) received the AAO-HNS-recommended course. Older patients and those who received steroids were more likely to receive imaging (p < 0.001, p = 0.03). Treatment with the AAO-HNS-recommended steroid regimen was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving laboratory evaluation (p = 0.02). Providers often advised follow-up; however, only 12.2% of patients were discharged with an electronic referral order. Conclusion: There are opportunities to standardize the treatment of patients in the ED presenting with acute facial palsy according to AAO-HNS CPGs.