Adjuvant chemotherapy for isolated resectable colorectal lung metastasis: A retrospective study using inverse probability treatment weighting propensity analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zhao Gao, Shi-Kai Wu, Shi-Jie Zhang, Xin Wang, Ying-Chao Wu, Xuan Jin
{"title":"Adjuvant chemotherapy for isolated resectable colorectal lung metastasis: A retrospective study using inverse probability treatment weighting propensity analysis.","authors":"Zhao Gao, Shi-Kai Wu, Shi-Jie Zhang, Xin Wang, Ying-Chao Wu, Xuan Jin","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). An inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to address indication bias. Survival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, Cox regression and confirmed by propensity score-matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 27.5 months (range, 18.3-50.4 months), the 5-year OS, CSS and DFS were 72.0%, 74.4% and 51.3%, respectively. ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC [original cohort: <i>P</i> = 0.08; IPTW: <i>P</i> = 0.15]. No differences were observed for CSS (<i>P</i> = 0.12) and DFS (<i>P</i> = 0.68) between the ACT and non-ACT groups. Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival, while sublobar resection (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-1.00, <i>P</i> = 0.049) and longer disease-free interval (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.044) were associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 10","pages":"3171-3184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with no evidence of disease after pulmonary metastasis resection (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial.

Aim: To assess the efficacy of ACT in patients after PM resection for CRC.

Methods: This study included 96 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC at a single institution between April 2008 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). An inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to address indication bias. Survival outcomes compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, Cox regression and confirmed by propensity score-matching (PSM).

Results: With a median follow-up of 27.5 months (range, 18.3-50.4 months), the 5-year OS, CSS and DFS were 72.0%, 74.4% and 51.3%, respectively. ACT had no significant effect on OS after PM resection from CRC [original cohort: P = 0.08; IPTW: P = 0.15]. No differences were observed for CSS (P = 0.12) and DFS (P = 0.68) between the ACT and non-ACT groups. Multivariate analysis showed no association of ACT with better survival, while sublobar resection (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-1.00, P = 0.049) and longer disease-free interval (HR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-0.98, P = 0.044) were associated with improved survival.

Conclusion: ACT does not improve survival after PM resection for CRC. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal ACT regimen and duration.

孤立的可切除结直肠肺转移瘤的辅助化疗:使用逆概率治疗加权倾向分析的回顾性研究。
背景:目的:评估辅助化疗(ACT)对结直肠癌(CRC)肺转移灶切除术后无疾病证据患者的疗效:这项研究纳入了2008年4月至2023年7月期间在一家机构接受肺转移切除术的96名CRC患者。主要终点是总生存期(OS);次要终点包括癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和无病生存期(DFS)。为解决适应症偏倚问题,进行了反治疗概率加权(IPTW)分析。采用卡普兰-梅耶曲线、对数秩检验、Cox回归对生存结果进行了比较,并通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行了确认:中位随访27.5个月(18.3-50.4个月),5年OS、CSS和DFS分别为72.0%、74.4%和51.3%。ACT对CRC PM切除术后的OS无明显影响[原始队列:P = 0.08;IPTW:P = 0.15]。ACT组和非ACT组的CSS(P = 0.12)和DFS(P = 0.68)无差异。多变量分析表明,ACT与提高生存率无关,而亚肺叶切除术(HR = 0.45;95%CI:0.20-1.00,P = 0.049)和更长的无病间隔期(HR = 0.45;95%CI:0.20-0.98,P = 0.044)与提高生存率有关:结论:ACT并不能提高CRC PM切除术后的生存率。结论:ACT 并不能提高 CRC PM 切除术后的生存率,需要进一步设计完善的随机对照试验来确定最佳的 ACT 方案和持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信