Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions: Analysis of the PC-SEARCH Registry.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Adam Mierzwa, Milagros Galecio-Castillo, Mahmoud Dibas, Sami Al Kasab, Ashley M Nelson, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Shashvat M Desai, Gabor Toth, Anas Alrohimi, Mohamad Abdalkader, Piers Klein, Thanh N Nguyen, Hisham Salahuddin, Aditya S Pandey, Sravanthi Koduri, Nirav Vora, Nameer Aladamat, Khaled Gharaibeh, Ehad Afreen, Syed F Zaidi, Mouhammad A Jumaa
{"title":"Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions: Analysis of the PC-SEARCH Registry.","authors":"Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Adam Mierzwa, Milagros Galecio-Castillo, Mahmoud Dibas, Sami Al Kasab, Ashley M Nelson, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Shashvat M Desai, Gabor Toth, Anas Alrohimi, Mohamad Abdalkader, Piers Klein, Thanh N Nguyen, Hisham Salahuddin, Aditya S Pandey, Sravanthi Koduri, Nirav Vora, Nameer Aladamat, Khaled Gharaibeh, Ehad Afreen, Syed F Zaidi, Mouhammad A Jumaa","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether rescue stenting (RS) following failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) results in superior functional outcomes and enhanced safety compared to the natural history of failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the PC-SEARCH registry, encompassing eight high-volume centers in the United States and covering the period from 2015 to 2021. Patients with BAO who experienced failed MT (mTICI score of 0-2a after at least one attempt of clot retrieval) were categorized based on whether they received additional intervention with RS. The primary outcome was a shift analysis of the 90-day mRS. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess both efficacy and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 444 patients, 119 presented failed MT and were included in the analysis. The RS group comprised 65 (14.6%) patients, while the control group consisted of 54 (12.2%) patients. After adjusting, the RS group showed a favorable shift in the overall 90-day mRS distribution (acOR=4.56; 95% CI 1.67-12.45; p=0.003) and higher rates of 90-day 0-3 mRS (RS: 44.6% vs. control: 18.5%, aOR=7.57; 95% CI 1.91-30.12; p = 0.004) compared to the control group. RS also showed lower rates of 90-day mortality (RS: 43.1% vs. control: 64.8%, aOR=0.27; 95% CI 0.09-0.80; p=0.018) and comparable rates of sICH (RS: 3.1% vs. control: 13%, aOR=0.31; 95% CI 0.05-1.95; p=0.214).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that RS is associated with improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality in BAO patients presenting MT failure. Further randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047694","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to investigate whether rescue stenting (RS) following failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) results in superior functional outcomes and enhanced safety compared to the natural history of failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the PC-SEARCH registry, encompassing eight high-volume centers in the United States and covering the period from 2015 to 2021. Patients with BAO who experienced failed MT (mTICI score of 0-2a after at least one attempt of clot retrieval) were categorized based on whether they received additional intervention with RS. The primary outcome was a shift analysis of the 90-day mRS. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess both efficacy and safety outcomes.

Results: Of a total of 444 patients, 119 presented failed MT and were included in the analysis. The RS group comprised 65 (14.6%) patients, while the control group consisted of 54 (12.2%) patients. After adjusting, the RS group showed a favorable shift in the overall 90-day mRS distribution (acOR=4.56; 95% CI 1.67-12.45; p=0.003) and higher rates of 90-day 0-3 mRS (RS: 44.6% vs. control: 18.5%, aOR=7.57; 95% CI 1.91-30.12; p = 0.004) compared to the control group. RS also showed lower rates of 90-day mortality (RS: 43.1% vs. control: 64.8%, aOR=0.27; 95% CI 0.09-0.80; p=0.018) and comparable rates of sICH (RS: 3.1% vs. control: 13%, aOR=0.31; 95% CI 0.05-1.95; p=0.214).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that RS is associated with improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality in BAO patients presenting MT failure. Further randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

急性基底动脉闭塞症机械取栓失败后的支架置入救治:PC-SEARCH登记分析。
背景:我们的目的是研究急性基底动脉闭塞(BAO)机械取栓术(MT)失败后,与机械取栓术(MT)失败的自然病史相比,抢救性支架置入术(RS)是否会带来更好的功能预后和更高的安全性:这项回顾性队列研究利用了PC-SEARCH注册中心的数据,该注册中心包括美国的8个高容量中心,涵盖时间为2015年至2021年。根据是否接受 RS 的额外干预,对 MT 失败的 BAO 患者(至少尝试过一次血块取出后 mTICI 评分为 0-2a)进行分类。主要结果是对 90 天 mRS 进行移位分析。采用多变量逻辑回归评估疗效和安全性结果:在总共 444 名患者中,有 119 名 MT 治疗失败的患者被纳入分析。RS组有65名患者(14.6%),而对照组有54名患者(12.2%)。调整后,与对照组相比,RS 组的 90 天 mRS 整体分布出现了有利的变化(acOR=4.56;95% CI 1.67-12.45;p=0.003),90 天 0-3 mRS 的比例更高(RS:44.6% 对对照组:18.5%,aOR=7.57;95% CI 1.91-30.12;p=0.004)。RS组的90天死亡率也低于对照组(RS组:43.1% vs. 对照组:64.8%,aOR=0.27;95% CI 0.09-0.80;p=0.018),sICH发生率与对照组相当(RS组:3.1% vs. 对照组:13%,aOR=0.31;95% CI 0.05-1.95;p=0.214):我们的研究表明,对于出现 MT 功能衰竭的 BAO 患者,RS 可改善其功能预后并降低死亡率。需要进一步的随机试验来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信