Adjusted Donor Age: A Clinical Score to Support Organ Acceptance Decisions in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.13477
Rupert Bright, Christoph F Mahler, Anamika Adwaney, Dhriti Dosani, Emma Morganti, Felix Friedl, Christian Nusshag, Claudius Speer, Louise Benning, Daniel Göth, Matthias Schaier, Claudia Sommerer, Markus Mieth, Arianeb Mehrabi, Martin Zeier, Christian Morath, Frank J M F Dor, Florian Kälble, Damien Ashby
{"title":"Adjusted Donor Age: A Clinical Score to Support Organ Acceptance Decisions in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation.","authors":"Rupert Bright, Christoph F Mahler, Anamika Adwaney, Dhriti Dosani, Emma Morganti, Felix Friedl, Christian Nusshag, Claudius Speer, Louise Benning, Daniel Göth, Matthias Schaier, Claudia Sommerer, Markus Mieth, Arianeb Mehrabi, Martin Zeier, Christian Morath, Frank J M F Dor, Florian Kälble, Damien Ashby","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As transplant programmes have evolved to allow a wider donor pool, organ acceptance decisions have become increasingly complex and lack transparency and equality. Clinical scoring tools exist but there is limited consensus on their use. From a prospective observation of consecutive deceased-donor kidney offers in a large urban transplant centre, a simple score was developed based on donor age and other risk characteristics, excluding ischemia time and graft histology. The score was validated in subsequent cohorts of consecutive offers in the United Kingdom and Germany. In the development cohort of 389 kidney offers, 110 (28%) were transplanted and 175 (45%) declined. Nine risk factors were incorporated into a score based on age, but adjusted for the number of risk factors present, making an \"adjusted donor age,\" with offers separated into equal quintiles by decade. The score was validated in a UK cohort of 380 subsequent offers, and a German cohort of 431 offers. In both cohorts adjusted donor age discriminated between favourable and poor post-transplant outcomes (C-statistic 0.77 in the United Kingdom, 95% CI 0.65-0.88, and 0.71 in Germany, 95% CI 0.64-0.77). Adjusted donor age is a simple score quantifying deceased donor kidney quality, which is consistent with current practice and predicts post-transplant outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"13477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As transplant programmes have evolved to allow a wider donor pool, organ acceptance decisions have become increasingly complex and lack transparency and equality. Clinical scoring tools exist but there is limited consensus on their use. From a prospective observation of consecutive deceased-donor kidney offers in a large urban transplant centre, a simple score was developed based on donor age and other risk characteristics, excluding ischemia time and graft histology. The score was validated in subsequent cohorts of consecutive offers in the United Kingdom and Germany. In the development cohort of 389 kidney offers, 110 (28%) were transplanted and 175 (45%) declined. Nine risk factors were incorporated into a score based on age, but adjusted for the number of risk factors present, making an "adjusted donor age," with offers separated into equal quintiles by decade. The score was validated in a UK cohort of 380 subsequent offers, and a German cohort of 431 offers. In both cohorts adjusted donor age discriminated between favourable and poor post-transplant outcomes (C-statistic 0.77 in the United Kingdom, 95% CI 0.65-0.88, and 0.71 in Germany, 95% CI 0.64-0.77). Adjusted donor age is a simple score quantifying deceased donor kidney quality, which is consistent with current practice and predicts post-transplant outcome.

调整供体年龄:支持已故供体肾移植中器官接受决定的临床评分。
随着移植计划的发展,捐献者的范围越来越广,器官接受的决定也变得越来越复杂,而且缺乏透明度和平等性。临床评分工具已经存在,但对其使用的共识有限。通过对一个大型城市移植中心连续提供的死亡供肾进行前瞻性观察,根据供肾者的年龄和其他风险特征(不包括缺血时间和移植物组织学)制定了一个简单的评分标准。随后在英国和德国的连续供肾队列中对该评分进行了验证。在 389 例肾脏捐献者中,110 例(28%)接受了移植,175 例(45%)拒绝移植。九个风险因素被纳入基于年龄的评分中,但根据存在的风险因素数量进行了调整,得出了 "调整后供体年龄",并按十年将供体分为相等的五等分。该评分在英国的 380 例后续供体队列和德国的 431 例供体队列中进行了验证。在这两个队列中,调整后的供体年龄可区分移植后结果好坏(英国的 C 统计量为 0.77,95% CI 为 0.65-0.88;德国的 C 统计量为 0.71,95% CI 为 0.64-0.77)。调整后的捐献者年龄是量化已故捐献者肾脏质量的一个简单评分,与当前的做法一致,并能预测移植后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信