Structured magnetic resonance imaging and endoanal ultrasound anal fistulas reporting template (SMART): An interdisciplinary Delphi consensus.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska, Pankaj Garg, Anders Mellgren, Antonino Spinelli, Stephanie Breukink, Francesca Iacobellis, Małgorzata Kołodziejczak, Przemysław Ciesielski, Christian Jenssen, Giulio Aniello Santoro
{"title":"Structured magnetic resonance imaging and endoanal ultrasound anal fistulas reporting template (SMART): An interdisciplinary Delphi consensus.","authors":"Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska, Pankaj Garg, Anders Mellgren, Antonino Spinelli, Stephanie Breukink, Francesca Iacobellis, Małgorzata Kołodziejczak, Przemysław Ciesielski, Christian Jenssen, Giulio Aniello Santoro","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is still considerable heterogeneity regarding which features of cryptoglandular anal fistula on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) are relevant to surgical decision-making. As a consequence, the quality and completeness of the report are highly dependent on the training and experience of the examiners.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a structured MRI and EAUS template (SMART) reporting the minimum dataset of information for the treatment of anal fistulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This modified Delphi survey based on the RAND-UCLA appropriateness for consensus-building was conducted between May and August 2023. One hundred and fifty-one articles selected from a systematic review of the literature formed the database to generate the evidence-based statements for the Delphi study. Fourteen questions were anonymously voted by an interdisciplinary multidisciplinary group for a maximum of three iterative rounds. The degree of agreement was scored on a numeric 0-10 scale. Group consensus was defined as a score ≥ 8 for ≥ 80% of the panelists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven scientific societies (3 radiological and 8 surgical) endorsed the study. After three rounds of voting, the experts (69 colorectal surgeons, 23 radiologists, 2 anatomists, and 1 gastroenterologist) achieved consensus for 12 of 14 statements (85.7%). Based on the results of the Delphi process, the six following features of anal fistulas were included in the SMART: Primary tract, secondary extension, internal opening, presence of collection, coexisting lesions, and sphincters morphology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured template, SMART, was developed to standardize imaging reporting of fistula-in-ano in a simple, systematic, time-efficient way, providing the minimum dataset of information and visual diagram useful to referring physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 10","pages":"3288-3300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is still considerable heterogeneity regarding which features of cryptoglandular anal fistula on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) are relevant to surgical decision-making. As a consequence, the quality and completeness of the report are highly dependent on the training and experience of the examiners.

Aim: To develop a structured MRI and EAUS template (SMART) reporting the minimum dataset of information for the treatment of anal fistulas.

Methods: This modified Delphi survey based on the RAND-UCLA appropriateness for consensus-building was conducted between May and August 2023. One hundred and fifty-one articles selected from a systematic review of the literature formed the database to generate the evidence-based statements for the Delphi study. Fourteen questions were anonymously voted by an interdisciplinary multidisciplinary group for a maximum of three iterative rounds. The degree of agreement was scored on a numeric 0-10 scale. Group consensus was defined as a score ≥ 8 for ≥ 80% of the panelists.

Results: Eleven scientific societies (3 radiological and 8 surgical) endorsed the study. After three rounds of voting, the experts (69 colorectal surgeons, 23 radiologists, 2 anatomists, and 1 gastroenterologist) achieved consensus for 12 of 14 statements (85.7%). Based on the results of the Delphi process, the six following features of anal fistulas were included in the SMART: Primary tract, secondary extension, internal opening, presence of collection, coexisting lesions, and sphincters morphology.

Conclusion: A structured template, SMART, was developed to standardize imaging reporting of fistula-in-ano in a simple, systematic, time-efficient way, providing the minimum dataset of information and visual diagram useful to referring physicians.

结构化磁共振成像和肛内超声肛瘘报告模板(SMART):跨学科德尔菲共识。
背景:磁共振成像(MRI)和肛门内超声(EAUS)显示的隐窝状肛瘘特征与手术决策的相关性仍存在相当大的差异。因此,报告的质量和完整性在很大程度上取决于检查人员的培训和经验。目的:开发一个结构化的磁共振成像和肛门内超声检查模板(SMART),报告治疗肛瘘的最低信息数据集:这项基于兰德-加州大学洛杉矶分校(RAND-UCLA)建立共识适宜性的改良德尔菲调查于 2023 年 5 月至 8 月间进行。从系统性文献综述中挑选出的 151 篇文章构成了数据库,用于生成德尔菲研究的循证声明。14 个问题由一个跨学科小组进行匿名投票,最多可进行三轮反复投票。一致程度按 0-10 分制评分。结果:结果:11 个科学协会(3 个放射协会和 8 个外科协会)支持这项研究。经过三轮投票,专家们(69 名结直肠外科医生、23 名放射科医生、2 名解剖学家和 1 名胃肠病学家)对 14 项声明中的 12 项达成了共识(85.7%)。根据德尔菲程序的结果,SMART 包括了肛瘘的以下六个特征:原发道、继发扩展、内口、存在集结、并存病变和括约肌形态:结论:SMART 是一个结构化模板,旨在以简单、系统、省时的方式规范肛瘘的影像报告,为转诊医生提供最基本的信息数据集和可视化图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信