Refining patient care: Evaluating prescription practices of medical residents and interns in a teaching hospital through an audit.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241300902
Afrah, Lahal Mohammed Abdulla, Nishfa Saleem, Aishwarya Baktharatchagan, Usha Vishwanath
{"title":"Refining patient care: Evaluating prescription practices of medical residents and interns in a teaching hospital through an audit.","authors":"Afrah, Lahal Mohammed Abdulla, Nishfa Saleem, Aishwarya Baktharatchagan, Usha Vishwanath","doi":"10.1177/20503121241300902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hospitals in India use the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers guidelines as criteria to ensure safe prescribing practices. This audit was conducted to provide insight into in-patient prescription of drugs to (1) evaluate the quality of prescriptions (2) reduce prescription and medication errors (3) improve the quality of care in terms of prescriptions that the hospital provides to the patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study was conducted in an in-patient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Chennai where 153 paper-based prescriptions were continuously collected from the internal medicine department over 1 month. The prescriptions were evaluated on 13 parameters that is, patient details (including name, age, sex and Hospital unique ID), height and weight, allergies, capital letters, legibility, date and time of prescription, medicine prescribed by generic name, brand name or both, dosage, route of administration, frequency, relation with food, stop order and signature of the doctor. The data obtained was summarised and analysed using Google Sheets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 153 prescriptions from the in-patient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital were audited. Out of the 153 prescriptions and 13 parameters assessed, patient details (including name, age, sex and Hospital unique ID), legibility, route of administration and frequency were found in all of the prescriptions. On further analysis, we found that only 12.26% of the prescriptions were compliant with the components of the stop order. The majority of the prescriptions (69.28%) contained both generic and trade names.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prescriptions are the most common areas of errors. This study shows the form of errors that can arise while prescribing medications. Doctors must be adequately trained to write prescriptions and follow the standards set by the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers. Audits need to be conducted regularly to ensure and improve the quality of prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"20503121241300902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241300902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hospitals in India use the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers guidelines as criteria to ensure safe prescribing practices. This audit was conducted to provide insight into in-patient prescription of drugs to (1) evaluate the quality of prescriptions (2) reduce prescription and medication errors (3) improve the quality of care in terms of prescriptions that the hospital provides to the patient.

Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in an in-patient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Chennai where 153 paper-based prescriptions were continuously collected from the internal medicine department over 1 month. The prescriptions were evaluated on 13 parameters that is, patient details (including name, age, sex and Hospital unique ID), height and weight, allergies, capital letters, legibility, date and time of prescription, medicine prescribed by generic name, brand name or both, dosage, route of administration, frequency, relation with food, stop order and signature of the doctor. The data obtained was summarised and analysed using Google Sheets.

Results: A total of 153 prescriptions from the in-patient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital were audited. Out of the 153 prescriptions and 13 parameters assessed, patient details (including name, age, sex and Hospital unique ID), legibility, route of administration and frequency were found in all of the prescriptions. On further analysis, we found that only 12.26% of the prescriptions were compliant with the components of the stop order. The majority of the prescriptions (69.28%) contained both generic and trade names.

Conclusion: Prescriptions are the most common areas of errors. This study shows the form of errors that can arise while prescribing medications. Doctors must be adequately trained to write prescriptions and follow the standards set by the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers. Audits need to be conducted regularly to ensure and improve the quality of prescriptions.

完善病人护理:通过审计评估教学医院住院医师和实习医师的处方实践。
目的:印度的医院将国家医院和医疗保健提供者认证委员会的指导方针作为标准,以确保安全的处方做法。本次审核旨在深入了解住院病人的处方用药情况,以便:(1)评估处方质量;(2)减少处方和用药错误;(3)提高医院为病人开具处方的护理质量:这项横断面研究在钦奈一家三级医疗教学医院的住院部进行,在一个月内连续从内科收集了 153 份纸质处方。对处方的 13 项参数进行了评估,即患者详细信息(包括姓名、年龄、性别和医院唯一 ID)、身高和体重、过敏症、大写字母、可读性、处方日期和时间、处方药物的通用名、品牌名或两者兼有、剂量、给药途径、频率、与食物的关系、停药令和医生签名。使用 Google Sheets 对获得的数据进行汇总和分析:审核了一家三级教学医院住院部的 153 份处方。在 153 份处方和 13 项评估参数中,我们发现所有处方中都包含患者详细信息(包括姓名、年龄、性别和医院唯一标识)、可读性、给药途径和频率。经进一步分析,我们发现只有 12.26% 的处方符合停药令的内容。大多数处方(69.28%)既包含通用名,也包含商品名:结论:处方是最常见的错误领域。本研究显示了在开具药物处方时可能出现的错误形式。医生在开处方时必须接受充分的培训,并遵循国家医院和医疗机构认证委员会制定的标准。需要定期进行审核,以确保和提高处方的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信