Effectiveness of percutaneous key lesion endoscopic lumbar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarian patients.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0300836
Chien-Tung Yang, Cheng-Che Hung, Chih-Ying Wu, You-Pen Chiu, Jeng-Hung Guo, Hui-Ru Ji, Cheng-Di Chiu
{"title":"Effectiveness of percutaneous key lesion endoscopic lumbar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarian patients.","authors":"Chien-Tung Yang, Cheng-Che Hung, Chih-Ying Wu, You-Pen Chiu, Jeng-Hung Guo, Hui-Ru Ji, Cheng-Di Chiu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0300836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With increasing life expectancy, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has become a common problem in the geriatric population. LSS reduces the quality of life, limits daily activities, and requires therapeutic aids. We share our experiences of treating octogenarian patients with LSS with key lesion percutaneous single portal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression (sEndo-ULBD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nine octogenarian patients who underwent sEndo-ULBD between January 2021 and July 2022 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Their visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height, spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordotic angle, lumbar scoliotic angle, and spinal canal area before and after sEndo-ULBD were followed up for more than six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS score was significantly reduced three months after the operation (p < 0.05). The postoperative ODI scores of all patients improved relative to their preoperative scores; this difference became significant in the third month after the operation (p < 0.05). Index-level disc height did not significantly change after the operation. Spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordotic angle, and lumbar scoliotic angle showed no significant curve progression. The spinal canal area increased markedly after sEndo-ULBD (p <0.05), with no known surgery-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key lesion sEndo-ULBD was an appropriate, safe, and effective treatment for octogenarian patients suffering from degenerative LSS. With an average follow-up of over one year, we did not find any significant progression in spinal curvature or instability. sEndo-ULBD is an ideal alternative to aggressive fusion fixation lumbar surgery for managing degenerative LSS in octogenarian patients with functional disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0300836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With increasing life expectancy, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has become a common problem in the geriatric population. LSS reduces the quality of life, limits daily activities, and requires therapeutic aids. We share our experiences of treating octogenarian patients with LSS with key lesion percutaneous single portal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression (sEndo-ULBD).

Materials and methods: Nine octogenarian patients who underwent sEndo-ULBD between January 2021 and July 2022 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Their visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height, spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordotic angle, lumbar scoliotic angle, and spinal canal area before and after sEndo-ULBD were followed up for more than six months.

Results: The VAS score was significantly reduced three months after the operation (p < 0.05). The postoperative ODI scores of all patients improved relative to their preoperative scores; this difference became significant in the third month after the operation (p < 0.05). Index-level disc height did not significantly change after the operation. Spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordotic angle, and lumbar scoliotic angle showed no significant curve progression. The spinal canal area increased markedly after sEndo-ULBD (p <0.05), with no known surgery-related complications.

Conclusions: Key lesion sEndo-ULBD was an appropriate, safe, and effective treatment for octogenarian patients suffering from degenerative LSS. With an average follow-up of over one year, we did not find any significant progression in spinal curvature or instability. sEndo-ULBD is an ideal alternative to aggressive fusion fixation lumbar surgery for managing degenerative LSS in octogenarian patients with functional disability.

经皮关键病灶内窥镜腰椎减压术治疗八旬老人腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。
导言:随着预期寿命的延长,退行性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)已成为老年人群中的一个常见问题。腰椎管狭窄症降低了生活质量,限制了日常活动,需要辅助治疗。我们分享了用关键病变经皮单门内镜单侧椎板切开术和双侧减压术(sEndo-ULBD)治疗八旬LSS患者的经验:本研究对2021年1月至2022年7月期间接受sEndo-ULBD的9名八旬患者进行了前瞻性研究。随访时间超过六个月,随访内容包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、椎间盘高度、脊柱滑脱、腰椎前凸角、腰椎侧弯角和椎管面积:结果:术后三个月,VAS评分明显降低(P < 0.05)。与术前相比,所有患者的术后 ODI 评分都有所提高;术后第三个月,这一差异变得明显(P < 0.05)。术后指数水平椎间盘高度没有明显变化。椎体滑脱、腰椎前凸角和腰椎侧弯角没有明显的曲线变化。手术后椎管面积明显增大(p 结论:手术后椎管面积明显增大:对于患有退行性腰椎间盘突出症的八旬老人来说,关键病变 sEndo-ULBD 是一种合适、安全且有效的治疗方法。在平均一年多的随访中,我们没有发现脊柱弯曲度或不稳定性有任何明显的进展。SEndo-UVBD 是一种理想的治疗方法,可替代积极的腰椎融合固定手术,用于治疗有功能障碍的八旬老人的退行性 LSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信