Efficacy of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2024.2421153
María B Sánchez, Michael J Callaghan, James Selfe, Michael Twigg, Toby Smith
{"title":"Efficacy of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"María B Sánchez, Michael J Callaghan, James Selfe, Michael Twigg, Toby Smith","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2024.2421153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To determine the efficacy of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches in the treatment of acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain.<b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search of: Cochrane Central register of controlled trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PubMed, for studies using transdermal anti-inflammatory patches vs placebo for management of musculoskeletal pain, e.g. soft tissue injuries or tendonitis (last search January 2024). Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools v1 was used for quality assessment and GRADE determined certainty of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed.<b>Results:</b> Twenty-three randomized placebo-controlled trials (n = 4729) were included. There was low-certainty evidence that transdermal patches provided statistically and clinically significant pain relief on movement at long-term follow-up for chronic musculoskeletal pain (effect size -2-69 (95% CI: -4.14, -1.24) and at short-term follow-up which was non-clinically significant, (-1.24: 95% CI: -1.78, -0.69).<b>Conclusion:</b> Several types of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches may offer short-term and long-term pain relief for acute and chronic musculoskeletal conditions. However, the clinical significance of this effect for the long-term pain relief was based on low-certainty evidence of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches versus placebo; for short-term pain there was an overall non-clinically significant improvement. Performing a meta-analysis for all outcomes was not possible due to insufficiency in the evidence-base.<b>Protocol registration:</b> www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42020185944.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"557-569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2024.2421153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine the efficacy of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches in the treatment of acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain.Methods: A comprehensive search of: Cochrane Central register of controlled trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PubMed, for studies using transdermal anti-inflammatory patches vs placebo for management of musculoskeletal pain, e.g. soft tissue injuries or tendonitis (last search January 2024). Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools v1 was used for quality assessment and GRADE determined certainty of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed.Results: Twenty-three randomized placebo-controlled trials (n = 4729) were included. There was low-certainty evidence that transdermal patches provided statistically and clinically significant pain relief on movement at long-term follow-up for chronic musculoskeletal pain (effect size -2-69 (95% CI: -4.14, -1.24) and at short-term follow-up which was non-clinically significant, (-1.24: 95% CI: -1.78, -0.69).Conclusion: Several types of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches may offer short-term and long-term pain relief for acute and chronic musculoskeletal conditions. However, the clinical significance of this effect for the long-term pain relief was based on low-certainty evidence of transdermal anti-inflammatory patches versus placebo; for short-term pain there was an overall non-clinically significant improvement. Performing a meta-analysis for all outcomes was not possible due to insufficiency in the evidence-base.Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42020185944.

透皮消炎贴对肌肉骨骼疼痛的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:确定透皮消炎贴对治疗急性和慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的疗效:方法:全面检索:方法:全面检索:Cochrane 对照试验中央登记簿、EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 PubMed,检索使用透皮消炎贴剂与安慰剂治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛(如软组织损伤或肌腱炎)的研究(最后检索日期为 2024 年 1 月)。质量评估采用 Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools v1,证据确定度采用 GRADE。进行了 Meta 分析:共纳入 23 项随机安慰剂对照试验(n = 4729)。有低确定性证据表明,透皮贴剂在长期随访中对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的运动疼痛缓解具有统计学和临床意义(效应大小为-2-69(95% CI:-4.14,-1.24),在短期随访中无临床意义,(-1.24:95% CI:-1.78,-0.69):结论:多种类型的透皮消炎贴片可缓解急性和慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的短期和长期疼痛。然而,对长期疼痛缓解效果的临床意义是基于透皮消炎贴片与安慰剂对比的低确定性证据;对短期疼痛的改善总体上无临床意义。由于证据基础不足,无法对所有结果进行荟萃分析。协议注册:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero 识别码为 CRD42020185944。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信