A signal model for fat-suppressed T1-mapping and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with interrupted spoiled gradient-echo readout.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Myrte Wennen, Wilhelm Stehling, J Tim Marcus, Joost P A Kuijer, Cristina Lavini, Leo M A Heunks, Gustav J Strijkers, Bram F Coolen, Aart J Nederveen, Oliver J Gurney-Champion
{"title":"A signal model for fat-suppressed T<sub>1</sub>-mapping and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with interrupted spoiled gradient-echo readout.","authors":"Myrte Wennen, Wilhelm Stehling, J Tim Marcus, Joost P A Kuijer, Cristina Lavini, Leo M A Heunks, Gustav J Strijkers, Bram F Coolen, Aart J Nederveen, Oliver J Gurney-Champion","doi":"10.1002/nbm.5289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The conventional gradient-echo steady-state signal model is the basis of various spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) based quantitative MRI models, including variable flip angle (VFA) MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE). However, including preparation pulses, such as fat suppression or saturation bands, disrupts the steady-state and leads to a bias in T<sub>1</sub> and DCE parameter estimates. This work introduces a signal model that improves the accuracy of VFA T<sub>1</sub>-mapping and DCE for interrupted spoiled gradient-echo (I-SPGR) acquisitions. The proposed model was applied to a VFA T<sub>1</sub>-mapping I-SPGR sequence in the Gold Standard T<sub>1</sub>-phantom (3 T), in the brain of four healthy volunteers (3 T), and to an abdominal DCE examination (1.5 T). T<sub>1</sub>-values obtained with the proposed and conventional model were compared to reference T<sub>1</sub>-values. Bland-Altman analysis (phantom) and analysis of variance (in vivo) were used to test whether bias from both methods was significantly different (p = 0.05). The proposed model outperformed the conventional model by decreasing the bias in the phantom with respect to the phantom reference values (mean bias -2 vs. -35% at 3 T) and in vivo with respect to the conventional SPGR (-6 vs. -37% bias in T<sub>1</sub>, p < 0.01). The proposed signal model estimated approximately 48% (depending on baseline T<sub>1</sub>) higher contrast concentrations in vivo, which resulted in decreased DCE pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of up to 35%. The proposed signal model improves the accuracy of quantitative parameter estimation from disrupted steady-state I-SPGR sequences. It therefore provides a flexible method for applying fat suppression, saturation bands, and other preparation pulses in VFA T<sub>1</sub>-mapping and DCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"e5289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional gradient-echo steady-state signal model is the basis of various spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) based quantitative MRI models, including variable flip angle (VFA) MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE). However, including preparation pulses, such as fat suppression or saturation bands, disrupts the steady-state and leads to a bias in T1 and DCE parameter estimates. This work introduces a signal model that improves the accuracy of VFA T1-mapping and DCE for interrupted spoiled gradient-echo (I-SPGR) acquisitions. The proposed model was applied to a VFA T1-mapping I-SPGR sequence in the Gold Standard T1-phantom (3 T), in the brain of four healthy volunteers (3 T), and to an abdominal DCE examination (1.5 T). T1-values obtained with the proposed and conventional model were compared to reference T1-values. Bland-Altman analysis (phantom) and analysis of variance (in vivo) were used to test whether bias from both methods was significantly different (p = 0.05). The proposed model outperformed the conventional model by decreasing the bias in the phantom with respect to the phantom reference values (mean bias -2 vs. -35% at 3 T) and in vivo with respect to the conventional SPGR (-6 vs. -37% bias in T1, p < 0.01). The proposed signal model estimated approximately 48% (depending on baseline T1) higher contrast concentrations in vivo, which resulted in decreased DCE pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of up to 35%. The proposed signal model improves the accuracy of quantitative parameter estimation from disrupted steady-state I-SPGR sequences. It therefore provides a flexible method for applying fat suppression, saturation bands, and other preparation pulses in VFA T1-mapping and DCE.

采用间断破坏梯度回波读取的脂肪抑制 T1 映射和动态对比增强磁共振成像的信号模型。
传统梯度回波稳态信号模型是各种基于破坏梯度回波(SPGR)的定量磁共振成像模型的基础,包括可变翻转角(VFA)磁共振成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE)。然而,加入脂肪抑制或饱和带等准备脉冲会破坏稳态,导致 T1 和 DCE 参数估计出现偏差。这项研究引入了一种信号模型,可提高中断破坏梯度回波(I-SPGR)采集的 VFA T1 映射和 DCE 的准确性。提出的模型被应用于黄金标准 T1 像(3 T)中的 VFA T1 映射 I-SPGR 序列、四名健康志愿者的大脑(3 T)以及腹部 DCE 检查(1.5 T)。将使用建议模型和传统模型获得的 T1 值与参考 T1 值进行了比较。使用Bland-Altman分析(模型)和方差分析(体内)来检验两种方法的偏差是否有显著差异(p = 0.05)。所提出的模型优于传统模型,在模型中相对于模型参考值的偏差减少了(3 T 时平均偏差为 -2% 对 -35%),在体内相对于传统 SPGR 的偏差减少了(T1 时偏差为 -6% 对 -37%,p 1)体内对比度浓度较高,这导致 DCE 药代动力学参数估计值减少达 35%。所提出的信号模型提高了从中断的稳态 I-SPGR 序列中进行定量参数估计的准确性。因此,它为在 VFA T1 映射和 DCE 中应用脂肪抑制、饱和带和其他准备脉冲提供了一种灵活的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信