Understanding the Knowledge, Attitude, Practice and Intention regarding Abortion among Federal and Provincial Policymakers.

Q3 Medicine
Madhabi Bajracharya, Nisha Gyawali, Tejaswee Bhattarai, Shipra Joshi, Jivan Devkota, Bishnu Devkota, Jayashree Rai, Samasti Tandukar, Amit Timilsina, Deeb Shrestha Dangol
{"title":"Understanding the Knowledge, Attitude, Practice and Intention regarding Abortion among Federal and Provincial Policymakers.","authors":"Madhabi Bajracharya, Nisha Gyawali, Tejaswee Bhattarai, Shipra Joshi, Jivan Devkota, Bishnu Devkota, Jayashree Rai, Samasti Tandukar, Amit Timilsina, Deeb Shrestha Dangol","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.5382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For more than two decades abortion is legalized in Nepal, recognizing unsafe abortion as one of the leading but preventable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. To safeguard safe abortion as women’s rights, several policies, guidelines, training manuals have been developed along with training human resources and increasing access to abortion services across Nepal. However, access to safe abortion services remains a challenge. Hence, to unravel the possible reasons behind these challenges, this study explored the knowledge, attitudes, practices and intentions of policymakers of Nepal towards abortion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methodology was used incorporating self-administered questionnaire for quantitative data collection and semi-structured interview guidelines to interview twenty local leaders from federal and provincial level, identified through purposive sampling. The ethical approval was taken from Nepal Health Research Council prior to data collection. After transcription and translation to English, Dedoose application was used for qualitative thematic analysis while the quantitative data was analysed using SPSS version.  Results: 70% understand that international health and human rights frameworks support abortion. Also, a majority (85%) believe that policies limiting abortion access create negative attitudes toward abortion. All the participants mentioned that they possess a good knowledge of safe abortion services. Majority of the participants had good attitude, confident in advocating, and had positive intention towards safe abortion services. However, existing socio-cultural barriers, lack of awareness, legal barriers and maintaining privacy were identified challenges to seek safe abortion and related services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite strong positive intentions, policy implementation gaps and lack of accountability have resulted in poor awareness, access, and acceptability of abortion related services. Further budget allocation, safe abortion prioritization, continuous advocacy, integration of abortion in preservice curriculum and community engagement and awareness will bridge these gaps â€\" to ensure equitable access to quality services including women and girls from marginalized community and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 2","pages":"299-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.5382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For more than two decades abortion is legalized in Nepal, recognizing unsafe abortion as one of the leading but preventable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. To safeguard safe abortion as women’s rights, several policies, guidelines, training manuals have been developed along with training human resources and increasing access to abortion services across Nepal. However, access to safe abortion services remains a challenge. Hence, to unravel the possible reasons behind these challenges, this study explored the knowledge, attitudes, practices and intentions of policymakers of Nepal towards abortion.

Methods: Mixed methodology was used incorporating self-administered questionnaire for quantitative data collection and semi-structured interview guidelines to interview twenty local leaders from federal and provincial level, identified through purposive sampling. The ethical approval was taken from Nepal Health Research Council prior to data collection. After transcription and translation to English, Dedoose application was used for qualitative thematic analysis while the quantitative data was analysed using SPSS version.  Results: 70% understand that international health and human rights frameworks support abortion. Also, a majority (85%) believe that policies limiting abortion access create negative attitudes toward abortion. All the participants mentioned that they possess a good knowledge of safe abortion services. Majority of the participants had good attitude, confident in advocating, and had positive intention towards safe abortion services. However, existing socio-cultural barriers, lack of awareness, legal barriers and maintaining privacy were identified challenges to seek safe abortion and related services.

Conclusions: Despite strong positive intentions, policy implementation gaps and lack of accountability have resulted in poor awareness, access, and acceptability of abortion related services. Further budget allocation, safe abortion prioritization, continuous advocacy, integration of abortion in preservice curriculum and community engagement and awareness will bridge these gaps â€" to ensure equitable access to quality services including women and girls from marginalized community and adolescents.

了解联邦和省级决策者对堕胎的认识、态度、做法和意向。
背景:二十多年来,堕胎在尼泊尔已经合法化,人们认识到不安全堕胎是导致孕产妇发病和死亡的主要原因之一,但这是可以预防的。为了保障作为妇女权利的安全堕胎,尼泊尔制定了多项政策、指导方针和培训手册,同时还对人力资源进行了培训,并在全国范围内增加了堕胎服务的可及性。然而,获得安全堕胎服务仍然是一项挑战。因此,为了揭示这些挑战背后的可能原因,本研究探讨了尼泊尔决策者对堕胎的认识、态度、做法和意图:研究采用了混合方法,包括用于定量数据收集的自填式调查问卷和半结构式访谈指南,对通过目的性抽样确定的 20 名联邦和省级地方领导人进行了访谈。在收集数据之前,已获得尼泊尔卫生研究委员会的伦理批准。在转录并翻译成英文后,使用 Dedoose 应用程序进行定性专题分析,而定量数据则使用 SPSS 版本进行分析。结果70%的人了解国际卫生和人权框架支持堕胎。此外,大多数人(85%)认为限制堕胎的政策会造成对堕胎的负面态度。所有参与者都提到,他们对安全堕胎服务非常了解。大多数参与者态度良好,有信心倡导安全堕胎服务,并对安全堕胎服务持积极态度。然而,现有的社会文化障碍、缺乏认识、法律障碍和维护隐私是寻求安全堕胎和相关服务所面临的挑战:尽管有强烈的积极意愿,但政策执行方面的差距和问责制的缺失导致人们对人工流产相关服务的认识、获取和接受程度较低。进一步的预算分配、将安全堕胎列为优先事项、持续的宣传、将堕胎纳入职前课程以及社区参与和提高认识将弥补这些差距,以确保包括来自边缘化社区的妇女和女童以及青少年在内的人们能够公平地获得优质服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信