Are multiracial faces perceptually distinct?

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Debbie S Ma, Justin Kantner, Eric M Elias, Salena Diaz, Kristin Pauker
{"title":"Are multiracial faces perceptually distinct?","authors":"Debbie S Ma, Justin Kantner, Eric M Elias, Salena Diaz, Kristin Pauker","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The explosive growth of individuals identifying as multiracial in the U.S. population has motivated significant interest in multiracial face perception. Interestingly, the literature reveals stunningly low rates of classifications of multiracial faces as multiracial. Five studies examined the possibility that this lack of correspondence is rooted in perceptual confusion. To test this, we utilized multidimensional scaling and discriminant function analysis to determine how participants mentally represent multiracial faces relative to Latinx and monoracial faces. Studies 1-3 establish that multiracial faces are perceptually discriminable from non-multiracial faces using three different sets of facial stimuli: Asian-White female (Study 1), Black-White female (Study 2), and Asian-White male faces (Study 3). Study 4 examined whether mental representation was further moderated by sample demographics by comparing U.S. participants sampled from Hawaii and California. Finally, Study 5 tests the consistency of mental representations across individuals and rules out potential statistical artifacts associated with group multidimensional scaling. These studies provide consistent evidence that multiracial faces are perceptually distinct from Latinx and monoracial faces, suggesting that the categorization patterns of multiracial faces observed in past research likely stem from downstream processes rather than perceptual confusability of multiracial faces. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The explosive growth of individuals identifying as multiracial in the U.S. population has motivated significant interest in multiracial face perception. Interestingly, the literature reveals stunningly low rates of classifications of multiracial faces as multiracial. Five studies examined the possibility that this lack of correspondence is rooted in perceptual confusion. To test this, we utilized multidimensional scaling and discriminant function analysis to determine how participants mentally represent multiracial faces relative to Latinx and monoracial faces. Studies 1-3 establish that multiracial faces are perceptually discriminable from non-multiracial faces using three different sets of facial stimuli: Asian-White female (Study 1), Black-White female (Study 2), and Asian-White male faces (Study 3). Study 4 examined whether mental representation was further moderated by sample demographics by comparing U.S. participants sampled from Hawaii and California. Finally, Study 5 tests the consistency of mental representations across individuals and rules out potential statistical artifacts associated with group multidimensional scaling. These studies provide consistent evidence that multiracial faces are perceptually distinct from Latinx and monoracial faces, suggesting that the categorization patterns of multiracial faces observed in past research likely stem from downstream processes rather than perceptual confusability of multiracial faces. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

多种族面孔在知觉上有区别吗?
在美国,被认定为多种族的人呈爆炸式增长,这激发了人们对多种族人脸感知的极大兴趣。有趣的是,文献显示,将多种族面孔归类为多种族的比例低得惊人。有五项研究探讨了这种缺乏对应性的现象是否源于知觉混淆。为了验证这一点,我们采用了多维缩放和判别函数分析法,以确定相对于拉丁裔和单种族面孔,参与者是如何在心理上表现多种族面孔的。研究 1-3 使用三组不同的面部刺激:亚裔-白人女性面部(研究 1)、黑人-白人女性面部(研究 2)和亚裔-白人男性面部(研究 3),确定了多种族面部在知觉上可与非多种族面部区分开来。研究 4 通过比较从夏威夷和加利福尼亚州抽样的美国参与者,检验了心理表征是否进一步受到样本人口统计学的调节。最后,研究 5 检验了心理表征在不同个体间的一致性,并排除了与群体多维缩放相关的潜在统计假象。这些研究提供了一致的证据,证明多种族面孔在知觉上有别于拉丁裔面孔和单种族面孔,这表明过去研究中观察到的多种族面孔分类模式可能源于下游过程,而不是多种族面孔的知觉混淆性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信