Pilot study on the in-vitro effect of radiation therapy on bending stiffness of intramedullary photodynamic implants.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Megan H Goh, Ali Kiapour, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew M Pfeiffer, Erhan Okay, Thomas Gausepohl, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
{"title":"Pilot study on the in-vitro effect of radiation therapy on bending stiffness of intramedullary photodynamic implants.","authors":"Megan H Goh, Ali Kiapour, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew M Pfeiffer, Erhan Okay, Thomas Gausepohl, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05272-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photodynamic implants are an increasingly popular minimally invasive option for the surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease. Following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is frequently administered to achieve better disease control and improve patient quality of life, but the role of RT in implant failures associated with photodynamic implants remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine if the therapeutic RT range of 10-50 Gy affects the biomechanical properties of photodynamic implants. For the experimental group, 15 photodynamic implants were divided evenly into 5 groups that were exposed to different doses of RT (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy). The control group consisted of 14 non-irradiated photodynamic implants. Four-point bending tests were conducted on all implants to determine bending stiffness. One-way ANOVA was conducted. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the non-irradiated control group was 38.0 ± 1.2. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the irradiated experimental groups was 39.2 ± 1.0. No significant difference was found between any groups. RT doses at a range of 10-50 Gy do not affect the bending stiffness of photodynamic implants. The yield and ultimate failure loads were 263.4 ± 5.2 (N) and 305.9 ± 5.5 (N) in the non-irradiated group vs. 266.8 ± 6.4 (N) and 306.8 ± 6.4 (N) in the irradiated group, respectively. The lack of statistical significance in the difference in stiffness, yield, and ultimate load properties among the groups means that it is less likely that RT at the evaluated doses contributes to intrinsic implant failure. Further studies need to be conducted to conclude the potential effect of RT on other mechanical properties of photodynamic implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05272-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photodynamic implants are an increasingly popular minimally invasive option for the surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease. Following surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is frequently administered to achieve better disease control and improve patient quality of life, but the role of RT in implant failures associated with photodynamic implants remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine if the therapeutic RT range of 10-50 Gy affects the biomechanical properties of photodynamic implants. For the experimental group, 15 photodynamic implants were divided evenly into 5 groups that were exposed to different doses of RT (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy). The control group consisted of 14 non-irradiated photodynamic implants. Four-point bending tests were conducted on all implants to determine bending stiffness. One-way ANOVA was conducted. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the non-irradiated control group was 38.0 ± 1.2. Bending stiffness (N/mm) mean ± standard deviation for the irradiated experimental groups was 39.2 ± 1.0. No significant difference was found between any groups. RT doses at a range of 10-50 Gy do not affect the bending stiffness of photodynamic implants. The yield and ultimate failure loads were 263.4 ± 5.2 (N) and 305.9 ± 5.5 (N) in the non-irradiated group vs. 266.8 ± 6.4 (N) and 306.8 ± 6.4 (N) in the irradiated group, respectively. The lack of statistical significance in the difference in stiffness, yield, and ultimate load properties among the groups means that it is less likely that RT at the evaluated doses contributes to intrinsic implant failure. Further studies need to be conducted to conclude the potential effect of RT on other mechanical properties of photodynamic implants.

关于放射治疗对髓内光动力植入物弯曲刚度的体外效应的试验性研究。
光动力植入物是手术治疗转移性骨病的一种日益流行的微创选择。手术后,为了更好地控制疾病和改善患者的生活质量,通常会进行辅助放射治疗(RT),但RT在光动力植入物相关植入失败中的作用仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定 10-50 Gy 的治疗性 RT 范围是否会影响光动力植入物的生物力学特性。在实验组中,15 个光动力植入体被平均分成 5 组,分别暴露于不同剂量的 RT(10、20、30、40 和 50 Gy)。对照组包括 14 个未受辐照的光动力植入体。对所有植入物进行四点弯曲测试,以确定弯曲刚度。进行了单因素方差分析。未照射对照组的弯曲硬度(N/mm)平均值(± 标准偏差)为 38.0 ± 1.2。辐照实验组的弯曲硬度(牛顿/毫米)平均值(± 标准偏差)为 39.2 ± 1.0。各组之间均无明显差异。10-50 Gy 的 RT 剂量不会影响光动力植入物的弯曲刚度。未照射组的屈服载荷和极限破坏载荷分别为 263.4 ± 5.2 (N) 和 305.9 ± 5.5 (N),而照射组的屈服载荷和极限破坏载荷分别为 266.8 ± 6.4 (N) 和 306.8 ± 6.4 (N)。各组在刚度、屈服和极限载荷特性方面的差异缺乏统计学意义,这意味着在所评估的剂量下,RT 导致种植体内在失效的可能性较小。要得出 RT 对光动力植入物其他机械性能的潜在影响的结论,还需要进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信