A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Oncologic Liver Resections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Opportunities to Improve Evidence and Outcomes.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Adel H Khan, Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Shaheer Ahmed, Alyssa A Wiener, Madhuri V Nishtala, Christopher C Stahl, Leslie Christensen, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Patrick B Schwartz, Syed Nabeel Zafar
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Oncologic Liver Resections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Opportunities to Improve Evidence and Outcomes.","authors":"Adel H Khan, Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Shaheer Ahmed, Alyssa A Wiener, Madhuri V Nishtala, Christopher C Stahl, Leslie Christensen, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Patrick B Schwartz, Syed Nabeel Zafar","doi":"10.1002/jso.27928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by liver cancers but there is a lack of understanding of their postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to review the current status of research in LMICs regarding outcomes after oncologic hepatectomy and synthesize the data reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus databases were searched from database inception to May 26th, 2022. Studies that reported outcomes after oncologic hepatectomy in LMIC settings were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers performed record screening and data extraction. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment tools. Pooled results with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-five studies and 16 985 patients were included. Most studies were of a \"fair\" quality. Two studies described pediatric patients. Only one study was from a low-income country and most African regions were not represented. The rates of major and minor complications were 11% and 27%, respectively, while 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2% and 3% each. Postoperative liver failure (8%), surgical site infections (6%), and bile leaks (6%) were common complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review indicates a dearth of data from LMICs on outcomes after hepatectomy, particularly from African regions and low-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by liver cancers but there is a lack of understanding of their postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to review the current status of research in LMICs regarding outcomes after oncologic hepatectomy and synthesize the data reported in the literature.

Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus databases were searched from database inception to May 26th, 2022. Studies that reported outcomes after oncologic hepatectomy in LMIC settings were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers performed record screening and data extraction. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment tools. Pooled results with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a random effects model.

Results: One hundred and thirty-five studies and 16 985 patients were included. Most studies were of a "fair" quality. Two studies described pediatric patients. Only one study was from a low-income country and most African regions were not represented. The rates of major and minor complications were 11% and 27%, respectively, while 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2% and 3% each. Postoperative liver failure (8%), surgical site infections (6%), and bile leaks (6%) were common complications.

Conclusions: This review indicates a dearth of data from LMICs on outcomes after hepatectomy, particularly from African regions and low-income countries.

中低收入国家肿瘤性肝切除术的系统回顾和荟萃分析:改善证据和结果的机会。
背景:中低收入国家(LMICs)的肝癌患者比例过高,但人们对他们的术后效果缺乏了解。本研究旨在回顾中低收入国家关于肿瘤性肝切除术后疗效的研究现状,并综合文献中报道的数据:方法:检索了 PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science 和世界卫生组织(WHO)Global Index Medicus 数据库中从数据库开始到 2022 年 5 月 26 日的所有文献。符合纳入条件的研究报告了在低收入国家和地区进行肿瘤肝切除术后的结果。两名独立审稿人进行了记录筛选和数据提取。采用美国国立卫生研究院研究质量评估工具进行偏倚风险评估。使用随机效应模型计算了汇总结果和 95% 置信区间 (95%CI):结果:共纳入 135 项研究和 16 985 名患者。大多数研究的质量为 "尚可"。两项研究描述了儿科患者。只有一项研究来自低收入国家,大多数非洲地区的研究未被纳入。主要和次要并发症的发生率分别为 11% 和 27%,30 天和 90 天死亡率分别为 2% 和 3%。术后肝功能衰竭(8%)、手术部位感染(6%)和胆汁渗漏(6%)是常见的并发症:本综述表明,低收入与中等收入国家缺乏有关肝切除术后效果的数据,尤其是非洲地区和低收入国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信