Liver Elastography-based Risk Score for Predicting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Chan Tian, Chunyan Ye, Haiyan Guo, Kun Lu, Juan Yang, Xiao Wang, Xinyuan Ge, Chengxiao Yu, Jing Lu, Longfeng Jiang, Qun Zhang, Ci Song
{"title":"Liver Elastography-based Risk Score for Predicting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk.","authors":"Chan Tian, Chunyan Ye, Haiyan Guo, Kun Lu, Juan Yang, Xiao Wang, Xinyuan Ge, Chengxiao Yu, Jing Lu, Longfeng Jiang, Qun Zhang, Ci Song","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) via vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) accurately assesses fibrosis. We aimed to develop a universal risk score for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with chronic hepatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically selected predictors and developed the risk prediction model (HCC-LSM) in the HBV training cohort (n = 2,251, median follow-up of 3.2 years). The HCC-LSM model was validated in an independent HBV validation cohort (n = 1,191, median follow-up of 5.7 years) and a non-viral chronic liver disease (CLD) extrapolation cohort (n = 1,189, median follow-up of 3.3 years). A HCC risk score was then constructed based on a nomogram. An online risk evaluation tool (LEBER) was developed using ChatGPT4.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight routinely available predictors were identified, with LSM levels showing a significant dose-response relationship with HCC incidence (P < .001 by log-rank test). The HCC-LSM model exhibited excellent predictive performance in the HBV training cohort (C-index = 0.866) and the HBV validation cohort (C-index = 0.852), with good performance in the extrapolation CLD cohort (C-index = 0.769). The model demonstrated significantly superior discrimination compared to six previous models across the three cohorts. Cut-off values of 87.2 and 121.1 for the HCC-LSM score categorized participants into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. An online public risk evaluation tool (LEBER; http://ccra.njmu.edu.cn/LEBER669.html) was developed to facilitate the use of HCC-LSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The accessible, reliable risk score based on LSM accurately predicted HCC development in patients with chronic hepatitis, providing an effective risk assessment tool for HCC surveillance strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) via vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) accurately assesses fibrosis. We aimed to develop a universal risk score for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with chronic hepatitis.

Methods: We systematically selected predictors and developed the risk prediction model (HCC-LSM) in the HBV training cohort (n = 2,251, median follow-up of 3.2 years). The HCC-LSM model was validated in an independent HBV validation cohort (n = 1,191, median follow-up of 5.7 years) and a non-viral chronic liver disease (CLD) extrapolation cohort (n = 1,189, median follow-up of 3.3 years). A HCC risk score was then constructed based on a nomogram. An online risk evaluation tool (LEBER) was developed using ChatGPT4.0.

Results: Eight routinely available predictors were identified, with LSM levels showing a significant dose-response relationship with HCC incidence (P < .001 by log-rank test). The HCC-LSM model exhibited excellent predictive performance in the HBV training cohort (C-index = 0.866) and the HBV validation cohort (C-index = 0.852), with good performance in the extrapolation CLD cohort (C-index = 0.769). The model demonstrated significantly superior discrimination compared to six previous models across the three cohorts. Cut-off values of 87.2 and 121.1 for the HCC-LSM score categorized participants into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. An online public risk evaluation tool (LEBER; http://ccra.njmu.edu.cn/LEBER669.html) was developed to facilitate the use of HCC-LSM.

Conclusion: The accessible, reliable risk score based on LSM accurately predicted HCC development in patients with chronic hepatitis, providing an effective risk assessment tool for HCC surveillance strategies.

基于肝脏弹性成像的肝细胞癌风险预测分数
背景和目的:通过振动控制瞬态弹性成像(VCTE)测量肝脏硬度(LSM)可准确评估肝纤维化。我们旨在开发一种通用的风险评分,用于预测慢性肝炎患者肝细胞癌(HCC)的发生:我们在 HBV 培训队列(n = 2,251 人,中位随访 3.2 年)中系统地选择了预测因子并开发了风险预测模型 (HCC-LSM)。HCC-LSM 模型在独立的 HBV 验证队列(n = 1,191,中位随访时间为 5.7 年)和非病毒性慢性肝病 (CLD) 推断队列(n = 1,189,中位随访时间为 3.3 年)中进行了验证。然后根据提名图构建 HCC 风险评分。使用 ChatGPT4.0 开发了在线风险评估工具 (LEBER):结果:确定了八个常规可用的预测因子,其中 LSM 水平与 HCC 发病率呈显著的剂量反应关系(通过对数秩检验,P < .001)。HCC-LSM 模型在 HBV 培训队列(C-index = 0.866)和 HBV 验证队列(C-index = 0.852)中表现出优异的预测性能,在外推法 CLD 队列(C-index = 0.769)中表现良好。在三个队列中,该模型的区分度明显优于之前的六个模型。HCC-LSM 评分的临界值为 87.2 和 121.1,将参与者分为低、中、高风险组。为方便使用 HCC-LSM 开发了一个在线公共风险评估工具 (LEBER;http://ccra.njmu.edu.cn/LEBER669.html):结论:基于 LSM 的易用、可靠的风险评分能准确预测慢性肝炎患者的 HCC 发展情况,为 HCC 监测策略提供了有效的风险评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信