Can Lower-Body Strength and Power Alleviate Load Carriage Performance Decrements (Tactical Deficit) in Simulated Law Enforcement Job Tasks?

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Ashley M Bloodgood, Joseph M Dulla, Megan B Thompson, Matthew R Moreno, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Robert G Lockie
{"title":"Can Lower-Body Strength and Power Alleviate Load Carriage Performance Decrements (Tactical Deficit) in Simulated Law Enforcement Job Tasks?","authors":"Ashley M Bloodgood, Joseph M Dulla, Megan B Thompson, Matthew R Moreno, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Robert G Lockie","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Law enforcement agencies typically have recruits complete fitness assessments without personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE negatively impacts performance. Greater strength and power could alleviate performance decrements due to the extra load, termed the tactical deficit (TD). The purpose of this study was to examine whether lower-body strength or power related to the TD in civilians performing police tasks. Twenty participants (12 men, 8 women) completed baseline tests, including: standing broad jump (SBJ); relative SBJ; absolute and relative isometric leg/back dynamometer (LBD) and one-repetition maximum hexagonal bar deadlift (HBD). In two other sessions, participants completed four police tasks, either unloaded or loaded (PPE=~8-10 kg), in a counterbalanced order: vertical jump (VJ), 75-yard pursuit run (75PR), 74.84-kg body drag, and 500-yard run. The VJ was also used as a power metric, with peak anaerobic power and power:body mass (P:BM) derived. Paired samples t-tests investigated differences between unloaded/loaded conditions for each task for each sex. Independent samples t-tests compared the sexes. Pearson's correlations derived relationships between strength and power tests with each task TD for each sex. Load negatively impacted task performance (<i>p</i>≤0.011); males generally outperformed females (<i>p</i>≤0.044). Superior SBJ, relative SBJ, VJ, P:BM, and absolute and relative HBD related to a smaller 75PR TD (<i>r</i>=-0.582 to -0.838). Greater absolute and relative HBD related to a lower body drag TD (<i>r</i>=-0.576 to -0.618) in men. For women, the relative SBJ related to a smaller VJ TD <i>(r</i>=-0.727). Developing lower-body strength and power could offset TD in foot pursuit and dragging tasks for personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 4","pages":"1577-1594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Law enforcement agencies typically have recruits complete fitness assessments without personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE negatively impacts performance. Greater strength and power could alleviate performance decrements due to the extra load, termed the tactical deficit (TD). The purpose of this study was to examine whether lower-body strength or power related to the TD in civilians performing police tasks. Twenty participants (12 men, 8 women) completed baseline tests, including: standing broad jump (SBJ); relative SBJ; absolute and relative isometric leg/back dynamometer (LBD) and one-repetition maximum hexagonal bar deadlift (HBD). In two other sessions, participants completed four police tasks, either unloaded or loaded (PPE=~8-10 kg), in a counterbalanced order: vertical jump (VJ), 75-yard pursuit run (75PR), 74.84-kg body drag, and 500-yard run. The VJ was also used as a power metric, with peak anaerobic power and power:body mass (P:BM) derived. Paired samples t-tests investigated differences between unloaded/loaded conditions for each task for each sex. Independent samples t-tests compared the sexes. Pearson's correlations derived relationships between strength and power tests with each task TD for each sex. Load negatively impacted task performance (p≤0.011); males generally outperformed females (p≤0.044). Superior SBJ, relative SBJ, VJ, P:BM, and absolute and relative HBD related to a smaller 75PR TD (r=-0.582 to -0.838). Greater absolute and relative HBD related to a lower body drag TD (r=-0.576 to -0.618) in men. For women, the relative SBJ related to a smaller VJ TD (r=-0.727). Developing lower-body strength and power could offset TD in foot pursuit and dragging tasks for personnel.

在模拟执法工作任务中,下肢力量和功率能否缓解负重能力下降(战术缺陷)?
执法机构通常让新招募人员在没有个人防护装备 (PPE) 的情况下完成体能评估。个人防护装备会对表现产生负面影响。更大的力量和功率可以减轻由于额外负担而导致的成绩下降,即战术赤字(TD)。本研究的目的是考察执行警务任务的平民的下肢力量或功率是否与战术缺陷有关。20 名参与者(12 名男性,8 名女性)完成了基线测试,包括:立定跳远(SBJ);相对 SBJ;绝对和相对等长腿部/背部测力计(LBD)和单次最大六角杠举重(HBD)。在另外两节课中,参与者按照平衡顺序完成了四项警察任务,包括空载或负载(PPE=~8-10 千克):纵跳(VJ)、75 码追逐跑(75PR)、74.84 千克身体拖拽和 500 码跑。立定跳远也被用作力量指标,并得出无氧峰值功率和功率:体重(P:BM)。配对样本 t 检验调查了每种任务在无负荷/有负荷条件下男女生的差异。独立样本 t 检验比较了性别差异。Pearson 相关性得出了每个性别的力量和功率测试与每项任务 TD 之间的关系。负荷对任务表现有负面影响(p≤0.011);男性的表现普遍优于女性(p≤0.044)。优异的 SBJ、相对 SBJ、VJ、P:BM 以及绝对和相对 HBD 与较小的 75PR TD 有关(r=-0.582 到 -0.838)。在男性中,绝对和相对 HBD 越大,身体阻力 TD 越小(r=-0.576 到 -0.618)。对于女性来说,相对 SBJ 与较小的 VJ TD 有关(r=-0.727)。发展下半身力量和力量可以抵消人员在追脚和拖拽任务中的TD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信