Measuring position sense.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Uwe Proske
{"title":"Measuring position sense.","authors":"Uwe Proske","doi":"10.1113/EP092190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Position sense is arguably more important than any of the other proprioceptive senses, because it provides us with information about the position of our body and limbs in relationship to one another and to our surroundings; it has been considered to contribute to our self-awareness. There is currently no consensus over the best method of measuring position sense. We have recently measured position sense with three commonly used methods. These were two-arm matching, one-arm pointing and one-arm repositioning, all carried out by blindfolded subjects with their lightly loaded forearms moving in the sagittal plane. It is currently believed that muscle spindles are the principal position sensors. We posed the question, was there evidence for spindles participating in the generation of position sense with each method? The indicator of spindle activity we used was the presence of thixotropic errors in the position signal, in response to conditioning voluntary contractions of forearm muscles. Based on this criterion, there was evidence of spindles contributing to position sense with all three methods. It was concluded that the spindle contribution to the position signal and the extent to which this was processed centrally was different with each method. It is argued that a case could be made for the existence of more than one position sense. Differences between the methods have implications for their meaning in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Position sense is arguably more important than any of the other proprioceptive senses, because it provides us with information about the position of our body and limbs in relationship to one another and to our surroundings; it has been considered to contribute to our self-awareness. There is currently no consensus over the best method of measuring position sense. We have recently measured position sense with three commonly used methods. These were two-arm matching, one-arm pointing and one-arm repositioning, all carried out by blindfolded subjects with their lightly loaded forearms moving in the sagittal plane. It is currently believed that muscle spindles are the principal position sensors. We posed the question, was there evidence for spindles participating in the generation of position sense with each method? The indicator of spindle activity we used was the presence of thixotropic errors in the position signal, in response to conditioning voluntary contractions of forearm muscles. Based on this criterion, there was evidence of spindles contributing to position sense with all three methods. It was concluded that the spindle contribution to the position signal and the extent to which this was processed centrally was different with each method. It is argued that a case could be made for the existence of more than one position sense. Differences between the methods have implications for their meaning in a clinical setting.

测量位置感。
位置感可以说比任何其他本体感觉都重要,因为它为我们提供了关于身体和四肢相互之间以及与周围环境之间位置关系的信息;它被认为有助于我们的自我意识。关于测量位置感的最佳方法,目前还没有达成共识。我们最近用三种常用方法测量了位置感。这三种方法分别是双臂匹配法、单臂指向法和单臂重新定位法,所有这些方法都是由蒙住眼睛的受试者在矢状面上用轻载的前臂进行的。目前认为,肌束是主要的位置传感器。我们提出了一个问题:是否有证据表明,每种方法都能使肌束参与产生位置感?我们使用的纺锤体活动指标是位置信号中存在触变误差,这是对前臂肌肉调节性自主收缩的反应。根据这一标准,所有三种方法都有证据表明纺锤体对位置感做出了贡献。结论是,纺锤体对位置信号的贡献以及中央处理的程度在每种方法中都是不同的。因此,可以认为存在不止一种位置感。这些方法之间的差异对它们在临床环境中的意义产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信