The impact of anesthesia instruments and drugs on the occurrence of vocal cord injury, systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Pourya Shokri, Mohammad Zarif, Ladan Kharaz, Ali Jahanian, Firoozeh Madadi, Reza Vafaee, Ali Dabbagh
{"title":"The impact of anesthesia instruments and drugs on the occurrence of vocal cord injury, systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pourya Shokri, Mohammad Zarif, Ladan Kharaz, Ali Jahanian, Firoozeh Madadi, Reza Vafaee, Ali Dabbagh","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09074-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study extensively examined common complications related to anesthesia drugs and equipment on vocal cords. It also delved into factors such as smoking, anesthesia duration and anesthesia induction methods. Overall, the research aimed to pinpoint influential factors for creating a general anesthesia protocol with minimal post-operative complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies concerning the impact of anesthesia drugs and equipment on the vocal cord, until May 2023. after screening and reviewing of full text, the characteristics of the study including sample size, age, dosage or size of anesthesia drugs and equipment, Duration of intervention, Adverse effects, and Maintenance of adverse effects, were extracted. The quality assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Jadad Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review included 39 studies from 1983 to 2023. The most frequent VCAEs were cough‎ (39.17%; CI = 9.84-68.51)‎, hoarseness (‎35.32%; CI = 25.04-45.60)‎, and erythema (35.09%; CI=-4.84-75.02). VC paralysis was relatively less frequent (‎4.16%; CI = 2.90-5.43)‎. Meta-regression showed no difference in the frequency of VCAEs with or without single-lung ventilation and smoking. However, the duration of procedure was shown to be affecting three outcomes; the duration shorter than 120 min is associated with lower rates of granuloma (2.74% vs. 44.30%; p < 0.05) and higher rates of cough (48.89% vs. 15.91%; p < 0.05) and VC paralysis (42.86% vs. 0.12%; p < 0.05). The overall outcomes were not affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most common anesthesia-related VCAEs are cough, erythema, and dysphagia, while serious complications like vocal cord hematoma and paralysis are rare. Also surgery duration significantly influences VCAE occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09074-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study extensively examined common complications related to anesthesia drugs and equipment on vocal cords. It also delved into factors such as smoking, anesthesia duration and anesthesia induction methods. Overall, the research aimed to pinpoint influential factors for creating a general anesthesia protocol with minimal post-operative complications.

Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies concerning the impact of anesthesia drugs and equipment on the vocal cord, until May 2023. after screening and reviewing of full text, the characteristics of the study including sample size, age, dosage or size of anesthesia drugs and equipment, Duration of intervention, Adverse effects, and Maintenance of adverse effects, were extracted. The quality assessment was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Jadad Scale.

Results: Our review included 39 studies from 1983 to 2023. The most frequent VCAEs were cough‎ (39.17%; CI = 9.84-68.51)‎, hoarseness (‎35.32%; CI = 25.04-45.60)‎, and erythema (35.09%; CI=-4.84-75.02). VC paralysis was relatively less frequent (‎4.16%; CI = 2.90-5.43)‎. Meta-regression showed no difference in the frequency of VCAEs with or without single-lung ventilation and smoking. However, the duration of procedure was shown to be affecting three outcomes; the duration shorter than 120 min is associated with lower rates of granuloma (2.74% vs. 44.30%; p < 0.05) and higher rates of cough (48.89% vs. 15.91%; p < 0.05) and VC paralysis (42.86% vs. 0.12%; p < 0.05). The overall outcomes were not affected.

Conclusions: The most common anesthesia-related VCAEs are cough, erythema, and dysphagia, while serious complications like vocal cord hematoma and paralysis are rare. Also surgery duration significantly influences VCAE occurrence.

麻醉工具和药物对声带损伤发生率的影响,系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的本研究广泛探讨了麻醉药物和设备对声带造成的常见并发症。研究还深入探讨了吸烟、麻醉持续时间和麻醉诱导方法等因素。总之,研究旨在找出影响因素,以制定术后并发症最少的全身麻醉方案:我们检索了 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 上截至 2023 年 5 月有关麻醉药物和设备对声带影响的研究。经过筛选和审阅全文后,提取了研究的特征,包括样本量、年龄、麻醉药物和设备的剂量或大小、干预持续时间、不良反应和不良反应的维持。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和贾达德量表进行质量评估:我们的综述包括了从 1983 年到 2023 年的 39 项研究。最常见的 VCAE 为咳嗽(39.17%;CI=9.84-68.51)、声音嘶哑(35.32%;CI=25.04-45.60)和红斑(35.09%;CI=-4.84-75.02)。VC麻痹的发生率相对较低(4.16%;CI=2.90-5.43)。元回归结果显示,单肺通气和吸烟与否导致 VCAE 的频率没有差异。然而,手术持续时间对三种结果均有影响;持续时间短于 120 分钟的肉芽肿发生率较低(2.74% 对 44.30%;P 结论:手术持续时间越短,肉芽肿发生率越高:最常见的麻醉相关 VCAE 是咳嗽、红斑和吞咽困难,而声带血肿和瘫痪等严重并发症则很少见。此外,手术时间也对 VCAE 的发生有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信