Rynhardt Le Roux, Lindy J. Thompson, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren, Sandi Willows-Munro
{"title":"Family Associations in a Breeding Colony of Critically Endangered Hooded Vulture (Necrosyrtes monachus) in the Lowveld of South Africa","authors":"Rynhardt Le Roux, Lindy J. Thompson, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren, Sandi Willows-Munro","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Numbers of Critically Endangered Hooded Vultures (<i>Necrosyrtes monachus</i> Temminck 1823) are declining across their distribution. The range-edge population in South Africa is one of the smallest populations with only 100–200 mature individuals. In South Africa, Hooded Vultures nest solitarily in loose colonies (mean distance between nests 0.76 km) along water courses. Basic ecological information, such as breeding behaviour, is still lacking for the species. In this study, we examine the relatedness and nest turnover of nesting individuals along the Olifants River and other locations in the Lowveld of South Africa by sampling nests over five consecutive years. A key hypothesis tested is whether communal roosting sites function as information-sharing hubs, a phenomenon that has been seen in Cape Vultures (<i>Gyps coprotheres</i>) and other cliff-nesting vultures. Theory suggests that information sharing occurs more frequently between closely related individuals. If true, we expect distance between nests and genetic relatedness to be positively correlated and individuals to use the same nests over multiple years. Naturally moulted feathers (<i>n</i> = 108) were collected below nests over five consecutive years, and 14 microsatellite loci markers were used to measure genetic relatedness. Mantel tests performed correlating distance between nests to relatedness coefficient estimators TrioML (<i>r</i> = 0.032, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.224) and LynchRD (<i>r</i> = 0.007, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.00005, <i>p</i> = 0.403), found no statistical correlation. The Mantel test performed using Nei's genetic distance and distance between nests did show a negative correlation (<i>r</i> = −0.108, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0117, <i>p</i>-value = 0.012), indicating that individuals that were more closely related tended to breed further away. No nest reuse was found in this study. We thus believe that these loose colonies do not act as food-finding hubs, but rather that the Olifants River is an important breeding site for these birds.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Numbers of Critically Endangered Hooded Vultures (Necrosyrtes monachus Temminck 1823) are declining across their distribution. The range-edge population in South Africa is one of the smallest populations with only 100–200 mature individuals. In South Africa, Hooded Vultures nest solitarily in loose colonies (mean distance between nests 0.76 km) along water courses. Basic ecological information, such as breeding behaviour, is still lacking for the species. In this study, we examine the relatedness and nest turnover of nesting individuals along the Olifants River and other locations in the Lowveld of South Africa by sampling nests over five consecutive years. A key hypothesis tested is whether communal roosting sites function as information-sharing hubs, a phenomenon that has been seen in Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres) and other cliff-nesting vultures. Theory suggests that information sharing occurs more frequently between closely related individuals. If true, we expect distance between nests and genetic relatedness to be positively correlated and individuals to use the same nests over multiple years. Naturally moulted feathers (n = 108) were collected below nests over five consecutive years, and 14 microsatellite loci markers were used to measure genetic relatedness. Mantel tests performed correlating distance between nests to relatedness coefficient estimators TrioML (r = 0.032, R2 = 0.001, p = 0.224) and LynchRD (r = 0.007, R2 = 0.00005, p = 0.403), found no statistical correlation. The Mantel test performed using Nei's genetic distance and distance between nests did show a negative correlation (r = −0.108, R2 = 0.0117, p-value = 0.012), indicating that individuals that were more closely related tended to breed further away. No nest reuse was found in this study. We thus believe that these loose colonies do not act as food-finding hubs, but rather that the Olifants River is an important breeding site for these birds.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.