Edoxaban Monotherapy and Incidence of Transcatheter Heart Valve Leaflet Thrombosis - The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rik Adrichem, Maarten P van Wiechen, Wiebe G Knol, Thijmen W Hokken, Joris F Ooms, Mark M P van den Dorpel, Sarah Verhemel, Isabella Kardys, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Joost Daemen, Alexander Hirsch, Ricardo P J Budde, Nicolas M Van Mieghem
{"title":"Edoxaban Monotherapy and Incidence of Transcatheter Heart Valve Leaflet Thrombosis - The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) Study.","authors":"Rik Adrichem, Maarten P van Wiechen, Wiebe G Knol, Thijmen W Hokken, Joris F Ooms, Mark M P van den Dorpel, Sarah Verhemel, Isabella Kardys, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Joost Daemen, Alexander Hirsch, Ricardo P J Budde, Nicolas M Van Mieghem","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trials comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) versus antiplatelet-based strategies have shown a reduction of subclinical leaflet thrombosis at the cost of increased mortality and major-bleedings. NOACs were often combined with antiplatelet therapy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) study aimed to evaluate the impact of edoxaban monotherapy on the incidence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and reduced leaflet motion (RLM) and to evaluate safety in terms of mortality, thromboembolic events and major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The REDOX study is a single-arm, open-label trial including patients after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with no formal indication for oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy. Patients received edoxaban monotherapy for 3 months, followed by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of HALT. Clinical follow-up continued up to 1 year after TAVI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 58 patients, of which 50 reached study completion including MSCT scanning and eight withdrew consent before end of study. At 3-months follow-up, HALT of any grade was detected in 12.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0%-23.1%) of patients. HALT grade ≥ 3 occurred in 4.0% (95% CI: 0.8%-12.2%) of patients. At 1 year follow-up, all patients were alive and free of disabling strokes. Three patients had a non-disabling stroke and one patient had a major bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the REDOX study, edoxaban monotherapy after TAVI was associated with a 12.0% incidence of any HALT and a 4.0% incidence of HALT grade ≥ 3. HALT was not associated with clinical events.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trials comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) versus antiplatelet-based strategies have shown a reduction of subclinical leaflet thrombosis at the cost of increased mortality and major-bleedings. NOACs were often combined with antiplatelet therapy.

Aims: The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) study aimed to evaluate the impact of edoxaban monotherapy on the incidence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and reduced leaflet motion (RLM) and to evaluate safety in terms of mortality, thromboembolic events and major bleeding.

Methods: The REDOX study is a single-arm, open-label trial including patients after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with no formal indication for oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy. Patients received edoxaban monotherapy for 3 months, followed by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of HALT. Clinical follow-up continued up to 1 year after TAVI.

Results: We included 58 patients, of which 50 reached study completion including MSCT scanning and eight withdrew consent before end of study. At 3-months follow-up, HALT of any grade was detected in 12.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0%-23.1%) of patients. HALT grade ≥ 3 occurred in 4.0% (95% CI: 0.8%-12.2%) of patients. At 1 year follow-up, all patients were alive and free of disabling strokes. Three patients had a non-disabling stroke and one patient had a major bleeding.

Conclusions: In the REDOX study, edoxaban monotherapy after TAVI was associated with a 12.0% incidence of any HALT and a 4.0% incidence of HALT grade ≥ 3. HALT was not associated with clinical events.

伊多沙班单药治疗与经导管心脏瓣膜瓣叶血栓形成的发生率--鹿特丹伊多沙班(REDOX)研究。
背景:比较非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)与基于抗血小板策略的试验显示,亚临床小叶血栓形成的减少是以死亡率和大出血的增加为代价的。鹿特丹埃多沙班(REDOX)研究旨在评估埃多沙班单药治疗对小叶低度增厚(HALT)和小叶运动减弱(RLM)发生率的影响,并评估死亡率、血栓栓塞事件和大出血的安全性:REDOX研究是一项单臂、开放标签试验,包括经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)成功后的患者,这些患者没有口服抗凝药或双联抗血小板疗法的正式适应症。患者接受埃多沙班单药治疗 3 个月,然后进行多层计算机断层扫描 (MSCT)。主要终点是发生 HALT。临床随访持续到 TAVI 术后 1 年:我们共纳入了 58 名患者,其中 50 人完成了包括 MSCT 扫描在内的研究,8 人在研究结束前撤回同意书。在3个月的随访中,12.0%(95% 置信区间(CI):5.0%-23.1%)的患者检测到任何级别的HALT。4.0%(95% 置信区间:0.8%-12.2%)的患者 HALT 等级≥3。随访 1 年时,所有患者均存活且未发生致残性中风。三名患者发生了非致残性中风,一名患者发生了大出血:在REDOX研究中,TAVI术后采用依多沙班单药治疗时,任何HALT的发生率为12.0%,HALT≥3级的发生率为4.0%。HALT与临床事件无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信