Establishment of an MRI-based radiomics model for distinguishing between intramedullary spinal cord tumor and tumefactive demyelinating lesion.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zifeng Zhang, Ning Li, Yuhang Qian, Huilin Cheng
{"title":"Establishment of an MRI-based radiomics model for distinguishing between intramedullary spinal cord tumor and tumefactive demyelinating lesion.","authors":"Zifeng Zhang, Ning Li, Yuhang Qian, Huilin Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01499-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differentiating intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) from spinal cord tumefactive demyelinating lesion (scTDL) remains challenging with standard diagnostic approaches. This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model for distinguishing scTDL from IMSCT before treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 75 patients were analyzed in this retrospective study, comprising 55 with IMSCT and 20 with scTDL. Radiomics features were extracted from T1- and T2-weighted imaging (T1&T2WI) scans upon admission. Ten classification algorithms were employed: logistic regression (LR); naive bayes (NaiveBayes); support vector machine (SVM); k nearest neighbors (KNN); random forest (RF); extra trees (ExtraTrees); eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost); light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM); gradient boosting (GradientBoosting); and multi-Layer perceptron (MLP). The performance of the optimal model was then compared to radiologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study developed 30 predictive models using ten classifiers across two imaging sequences. The MLP model with two sequences (T1&T2WI) emerged as the most effective one, showing superior accuracy in MRI analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.991 in training and 0.962 in testing. Moreover, statistical analyses highlighted the radiomics model significantly outperformed radiologists' assessments (p < 0.05) in distinguishing between IMSCT and scTDL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present an MRI-based radiomics model with high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating IMSCT from scTDL. The model's performance was comparable to junior radiologists, highlighting its potential as an effective diagnostic aid in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01499-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Differentiating intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) from spinal cord tumefactive demyelinating lesion (scTDL) remains challenging with standard diagnostic approaches. This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model for distinguishing scTDL from IMSCT before treatment initiation.

Methods: A total of 75 patients were analyzed in this retrospective study, comprising 55 with IMSCT and 20 with scTDL. Radiomics features were extracted from T1- and T2-weighted imaging (T1&T2WI) scans upon admission. Ten classification algorithms were employed: logistic regression (LR); naive bayes (NaiveBayes); support vector machine (SVM); k nearest neighbors (KNN); random forest (RF); extra trees (ExtraTrees); eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost); light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM); gradient boosting (GradientBoosting); and multi-Layer perceptron (MLP). The performance of the optimal model was then compared to radiologists' assessments.

Results: This study developed 30 predictive models using ten classifiers across two imaging sequences. The MLP model with two sequences (T1&T2WI) emerged as the most effective one, showing superior accuracy in MRI analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.991 in training and 0.962 in testing. Moreover, statistical analyses highlighted the radiomics model significantly outperformed radiologists' assessments (p < 0.05) in distinguishing between IMSCT and scTDL.

Conclusion: We present an MRI-based radiomics model with high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating IMSCT from scTDL. The model's performance was comparable to junior radiologists, highlighting its potential as an effective diagnostic aid in clinical practice.

建立基于核磁共振成像的放射组学模型,用于区分髓内脊髓肿瘤和肿瘤活性脱髓鞘病变。
目的:标准诊断方法仍难以区分髓内脊髓肿瘤(IMSCT)和脊髓肿瘤活动性脱髓鞘病变(scTDL)。本研究旨在开发和评估基于磁共振成像(MRI)的放射组学模型的有效性,以便在开始治疗前区分scTDL和IMSCT:这项回顾性研究共分析了75例患者,其中55例为IMSCT患者,20例为scTDL患者。从入院时的T1和T2加权成像(T1&T2WI)扫描中提取放射组学特征。采用了十种分类算法:逻辑回归(LR)、奈夫贝叶斯(NaiveBayes)、支持向量机(SVM)、k近邻(KNN)、随机森林(RF)、额外树(ExtraTrees)、极梯度提升(XGBoost)、轻梯度提升机(LightGBM)、梯度提升(GradientBoosting)和多层感知器(MLP)。然后将最佳模型的性能与放射科医生的评估结果进行比较:结果:这项研究使用 10 个分类器开发了 30 个预测模型,涵盖两个成像序列。两个序列(T1&T2WI)的 MLP 模型成为最有效的模型,在 MRI 分析中显示出更高的准确性,训练中的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.991,测试中为 0.962。此外,统计分析表明,放射组学模型明显优于放射科医生的评估结果(p 结论:我们提出的基于 MRI 的放射组学模型在区分 IMSCT 和 scTDL 方面具有很高的诊断准确性。该模型的表现可与初级放射科医生媲美,突出了其在临床实践中作为有效诊断辅助工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信