The effect of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human resting state wake EEG and event-related potential: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Anna C Prins, Koen Baas, Johan N van der Meer, Marc Jacobs, Aart J Nederveen
{"title":"The effect of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human resting state wake EEG and event-related potential: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anna C Prins, Koen Baas, Johan N van der Meer, Marc Jacobs, Aart J Nederveen","doi":"10.1002/bem.22531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid growth of mobile phone usage and its use of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) have raised concerns about potential health risks. Researchers have conducted studies to examine the effects of RF-EMF on the brain using electroencephalography (EEG). We conducted a systematic quality assessment and meta-analysis of published research in this field to establish high-quality studies as references for future protocols. The electronic search yielded 244 records from which a total of 51 studies were included in the review after excluding studies based on study design, and data or report availability. Of these 51 studies, 31 (61%) focused on resting state wake EEG and 20 (39%) on event-related potentials (ERP). None of the 51 studies were free from risk of bias. From the 51 included studies, we were able to use seven studies to create three different groups for meta-analysis for resting state wake EEG and five studies to create 10 different groups for meta-analysis for ERP. Per group the number of studies varies from 1 to 5. Our procedure is the first systematic quality assessment in this field and revealed three important findings. First, there is evidence of an effect on the EEG of a 2G protocol using an eyes-open condition. Second, we did not find evidence for EEG effects during task performance. This suggests that the impact of EMF during task performance is less pronounced compared to the resting state condition. Third, this meta-analysis shows that the field is unable to create an evidence base for most comparisons due to heterogeneity. We therefore advise that all future studies are double-blind in nature, adhere to the methodological standard of randomized experiments, and publish their protocols first.</p>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid growth of mobile phone usage and its use of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) have raised concerns about potential health risks. Researchers have conducted studies to examine the effects of RF-EMF on the brain using electroencephalography (EEG). We conducted a systematic quality assessment and meta-analysis of published research in this field to establish high-quality studies as references for future protocols. The electronic search yielded 244 records from which a total of 51 studies were included in the review after excluding studies based on study design, and data or report availability. Of these 51 studies, 31 (61%) focused on resting state wake EEG and 20 (39%) on event-related potentials (ERP). None of the 51 studies were free from risk of bias. From the 51 included studies, we were able to use seven studies to create three different groups for meta-analysis for resting state wake EEG and five studies to create 10 different groups for meta-analysis for ERP. Per group the number of studies varies from 1 to 5. Our procedure is the first systematic quality assessment in this field and revealed three important findings. First, there is evidence of an effect on the EEG of a 2G protocol using an eyes-open condition. Second, we did not find evidence for EEG effects during task performance. This suggests that the impact of EMF during task performance is less pronounced compared to the resting state condition. Third, this meta-analysis shows that the field is unable to create an evidence base for most comparisons due to heterogeneity. We therefore advise that all future studies are double-blind in nature, adhere to the methodological standard of randomized experiments, and publish their protocols first.

手机电磁场对人体静息唤醒脑电图和事件相关电位的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
移动电话使用量的快速增长及其使用的射频电磁场(RF-EMF)引起了人们对潜在健康风险的担忧。研究人员利用脑电图(EEG)对射频电磁场对大脑的影响进行了研究。我们对该领域已发表的研究进行了系统的质量评估和荟萃分析,以确定高质量的研究作为未来方案的参考。通过电子检索获得了 244 条记录,在根据研究设计、数据或报告可用性排除研究后,共有 51 项研究被纳入综述。在这 51 项研究中,31 项(61%)侧重于静息状态唤醒脑电图,20 项(39%)侧重于事件相关电位 (ERP)。这 51 项研究都不存在偏倚风险。在纳入的 51 项研究中,我们利用 7 项研究创建了 3 个不同的静息状态清醒脑电图荟萃分析组,利用 5 项研究创建了 10 个不同的 ERP 荟萃分析组。每组的研究数量从 1 到 5 不等。我们的程序是这一领域的首次系统性质量评估,揭示了三个重要发现。首先,有证据表明睁眼条件下的 2G 方案对脑电图有影响。其次,我们没有发现任务执行过程中对脑电图产生影响的证据。这表明,与静息状态相比,任务执行期间电磁场的影响并不明显。第三,这项荟萃分析表明,由于异质性,该领域无法为大多数比较建立证据基础。因此,我们建议今后所有的研究都应采用双盲法,遵守随机实验的方法标准,并首先公布研究方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioelectromagnetics
Bioelectromagnetics 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioelectromagnetics is published by Wiley-Liss, Inc., for the Bioelectromagnetics Society and is the official journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association. It is a peer-reviewed, internationally circulated scientific journal that specializes in reporting original data on biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields that range in frequency from zero hertz (static fields) to the terahertz undulations and visible light. Both experimental and clinical data are of interest to the journal''s readers as are theoretical papers or reviews that offer novel insights into or criticism of contemporary concepts and theories of field-body interactions. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, which sponsors the journal, also welcomes experimental or clinical papers on the domains of sonic and ultrasonic radiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信