An observational cross-sectional study on the characteristics of children and adolescents with non-specific spinal pain stratified by pain severity.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Brigitte Wirth, Christina Knecht, Mette Hobaek Siegenthaler, Petra Schweinhardt
{"title":"An observational cross-sectional study on the characteristics of children and adolescents with non-specific spinal pain stratified by pain severity.","authors":"Brigitte Wirth, Christina Knecht, Mette Hobaek Siegenthaler, Petra Schweinhardt","doi":"10.1186/s12887-024-05194-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing self-limiting ('trivial') from potentially consequential spinal pain in childhood and adolescence is crucial to prevent over- or under-medicalization. The aim of this study was to stratify participants for severity of spinal pain and to investigate associations of pain severity with potential consequences of pain and some psychophysical and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2020 and 2021, children and adolescents took part in a voluntary population-based spine screening event across Switzerland organized by the Swiss Chiropractors Association. The screening consisted of a questionnaire (14 questions) based on the Young Spine Questionnaire and a clinical examination by a chiropractor. Three subgroups of pain severity [no pain (including mild, occasional pain), one-sited moderate pain, one-sited severe or moderate/severe pain at multiple sites of the spine] were formed by combining the self-reported measures for pain intensity and pain frequency for two recall periods (lifetime, last week) according to literature. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the associations between pain severity and potential pain consequences (impact of spinal pain on health and seeking medical advice because of spinal pain), as well as between pain severity and some psychophysical factors (head and/or belly pain, sleep problems, daytime tiredness) and clinical measures [trunk symmetry (rib hump), trunk muscle endurance (plank position)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all participants (N = 457; 6-16 years; mean age = 10.9 ± 3.0 years; 220 boys), those with most severe spinal pain and with one-sited moderate pain in the last week had higher odds for reporting an impact of spinal pain on their health (OR = 13.5, 95%CI = 4.9-36.8; OR = 4.7, 95%CI = 1.5-14.4) and for searching medical advice because of spinal pain (OR = 11.6, 95%CI = 4.5-30.1; OR = 3.9, 95%CI = 1.6-9.2). Headache and/or belly pain (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.2-5.5) and daytime tiredness (OR = 3.2, 95%CI = 1.3-7.9) increased the odds for having most severe pain compared to having no pain. The clinical measures were not associated with pain severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stratification by pain severity, particularly when asked for pain in the last week, might help to minimize over- and under-medicalization of spinal pain in childhood and adolescence. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the relevance of the investigated clinical tests in the context of adolescent spinal pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05194-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing self-limiting ('trivial') from potentially consequential spinal pain in childhood and adolescence is crucial to prevent over- or under-medicalization. The aim of this study was to stratify participants for severity of spinal pain and to investigate associations of pain severity with potential consequences of pain and some psychophysical and clinical factors.

Methods: In 2020 and 2021, children and adolescents took part in a voluntary population-based spine screening event across Switzerland organized by the Swiss Chiropractors Association. The screening consisted of a questionnaire (14 questions) based on the Young Spine Questionnaire and a clinical examination by a chiropractor. Three subgroups of pain severity [no pain (including mild, occasional pain), one-sited moderate pain, one-sited severe or moderate/severe pain at multiple sites of the spine] were formed by combining the self-reported measures for pain intensity and pain frequency for two recall periods (lifetime, last week) according to literature. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the associations between pain severity and potential pain consequences (impact of spinal pain on health and seeking medical advice because of spinal pain), as well as between pain severity and some psychophysical factors (head and/or belly pain, sleep problems, daytime tiredness) and clinical measures [trunk symmetry (rib hump), trunk muscle endurance (plank position)].

Results: Of all participants (N = 457; 6-16 years; mean age = 10.9 ± 3.0 years; 220 boys), those with most severe spinal pain and with one-sited moderate pain in the last week had higher odds for reporting an impact of spinal pain on their health (OR = 13.5, 95%CI = 4.9-36.8; OR = 4.7, 95%CI = 1.5-14.4) and for searching medical advice because of spinal pain (OR = 11.6, 95%CI = 4.5-30.1; OR = 3.9, 95%CI = 1.6-9.2). Headache and/or belly pain (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.2-5.5) and daytime tiredness (OR = 3.2, 95%CI = 1.3-7.9) increased the odds for having most severe pain compared to having no pain. The clinical measures were not associated with pain severity.

Conclusion: Stratification by pain severity, particularly when asked for pain in the last week, might help to minimize over- and under-medicalization of spinal pain in childhood and adolescence. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the relevance of the investigated clinical tests in the context of adolescent spinal pain.

按疼痛严重程度分层的非特异性脊柱疼痛儿童和青少年特征观察性横断面研究。
背景:区分儿童和青少年时期的自限性脊柱疼痛("琐碎")和潜在后果性脊柱疼痛对于防止过度或不足医疗至关重要。本研究旨在根据脊柱疼痛的严重程度对参与者进行分层,并调查疼痛严重程度与疼痛的潜在后果以及一些心理物理和临床因素之间的关联:2020年和2021年,儿童和青少年参加了由瑞士脊骨神经科医师协会在瑞士各地组织的自愿人群脊柱筛查活动。筛查包括一份以青少年脊柱问卷为基础的问卷(14个问题)和脊骨神经科医生的临床检查。根据文献资料,结合两个回忆期(终生、上周)的疼痛强度和疼痛频率的自我报告测量结果,形成了疼痛严重程度的三个亚组[无痛(包括轻微、偶尔疼痛)、单点中度疼痛、单点重度疼痛或脊柱多个部位的中度/重度疼痛]。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定疼痛严重程度与潜在疼痛后果(脊柱疼痛对健康的影响和因脊柱疼痛就医)之间的关联,以及疼痛严重程度与一些心理物理因素(头部和/或腹部疼痛、睡眠问题、白天疲倦)和临床测量指标[躯干对称性(肋骨驼峰)、躯干肌肉耐力(平卧姿势)]之间的关联:结果:在所有参与者(N = 457;6-16 岁;平均年龄 = 10.9 ± 3.0 岁;220 名男孩)中,脊柱疼痛最严重者和上周有一次中度疼痛者报告脊柱疼痛影响其健康的几率更高(OR = 13.5,95%CI = 4.9-36.8;OR = 4.7,95%CI = 1.5-14.4),以及因脊柱疼痛而寻求医疗建议的几率更高(OR = 11.6,95%CI = 4.5-30.1;OR = 3.9,95%CI = 1.6-9.2)。与无疼痛相比,头痛和/或腹痛(OR = 2.6,95%CI = 1.2-5.5)和白天疲倦(OR = 3.2,95%CI = 1.3-7.9)会增加最严重疼痛的几率。临床指标与疼痛严重程度无关:根据疼痛严重程度进行分层,尤其是询问最近一周的疼痛情况时,可能有助于最大限度地减少儿童和青少年脊柱疼痛的过度医疗和医疗不足。需要进行前瞻性研究,以明确所调查的临床测试与青少年脊柱疼痛的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信