Radiomics-based automated machine learning for differentiating focal liver lesions on unenhanced computed tomography.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nan Yang, Zhuangxuan Ma, Ling Zhang, Wenbin Ji, Qian Xi, Ming Li, Liang Jin
{"title":"Radiomics-based automated machine learning for differentiating focal liver lesions on unenhanced computed tomography.","authors":"Nan Yang, Zhuangxuan Ma, Ling Zhang, Wenbin Ji, Qian Xi, Ming Li, Liang Jin","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04685-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the primary method for focal liver lesion diagnosis. We aimed to use automated machine learning (AutoML) algorithms to differentiate between benign and malignant focal liver lesions on the basis of radiomics from unenhanced CT images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 260 patients from 2 medical centers who underwent CT examinations between January 2017 and March 2023. This included 60 cases of hepatic malignancies, 93 cases of hepatic hemangiomas, 48 cases of hepatic abscesses, and 84 cases of hepatic cysts. The Pyradiomics method was used to extract radiomics features from unenhanced CT images. By using the mljar-supervised (MLJAR) AutoML framework, clinical, radiomics, and fusion models combining clinical and radiomics features were established.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training and validation sets, the area under the curve (AUC) values for the clinical, radiomics, and fusion models exceeded 0.900. In the external testing set, the respective AUC values for the clinical, radiomics, and fusion models were as follows: 0.88, 1.00, and 1.00 for hepatic cysts; 0.81, 0.90, and 0.97 for hepatic hemangiomas; 0.89, 0.98, and 0.92 for hepatic abscesses; and 0.23, 0.80, and 0.93 for hepatic malignancies. The diagnostic accuracy rates for hepatic cysts, hemangiomas, malignancies, and abscesses by radiologists in the external testing cohort were 0.96, 0.60, 0.79, and 0.66, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fusion model based on noninvasive radiomics and clinical features of unenhanced CT images has high clinical value for distinguishing focal hepatic lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04685-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the primary method for focal liver lesion diagnosis. We aimed to use automated machine learning (AutoML) algorithms to differentiate between benign and malignant focal liver lesions on the basis of radiomics from unenhanced CT images.

Methods: We enrolled 260 patients from 2 medical centers who underwent CT examinations between January 2017 and March 2023. This included 60 cases of hepatic malignancies, 93 cases of hepatic hemangiomas, 48 cases of hepatic abscesses, and 84 cases of hepatic cysts. The Pyradiomics method was used to extract radiomics features from unenhanced CT images. By using the mljar-supervised (MLJAR) AutoML framework, clinical, radiomics, and fusion models combining clinical and radiomics features were established.

Results: In the training and validation sets, the area under the curve (AUC) values for the clinical, radiomics, and fusion models exceeded 0.900. In the external testing set, the respective AUC values for the clinical, radiomics, and fusion models were as follows: 0.88, 1.00, and 1.00 for hepatic cysts; 0.81, 0.90, and 0.97 for hepatic hemangiomas; 0.89, 0.98, and 0.92 for hepatic abscesses; and 0.23, 0.80, and 0.93 for hepatic malignancies. The diagnostic accuracy rates for hepatic cysts, hemangiomas, malignancies, and abscesses by radiologists in the external testing cohort were 0.96, 0.60, 0.79, and 0.66, respectively.

Conclusion: The fusion model based on noninvasive radiomics and clinical features of unenhanced CT images has high clinical value for distinguishing focal hepatic lesions.

基于放射组学的自动机器学习,用于区分未增强计算机断层扫描上的肝脏病灶。
背景和目的:增强计算机断层扫描(CT)是诊断肝脏病灶的主要方法。我们旨在使用自动机器学习(AutoML)算法,根据未增强 CT 图像的放射组学来区分肝脏病灶的良性和恶性:我们从 2 个医疗中心招募了 260 名患者,他们在 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间接受了 CT 检查。其中包括 60 例肝恶性肿瘤、93 例肝血管瘤、48 例肝脓肿和 84 例肝囊肿。Pyradiomics 方法用于从未增强 CT 图像中提取放射组学特征。通过使用 mljar-supervised (MLJAR) AutoML 框架,建立了临床、放射组学以及结合临床和放射组学特征的融合模型:在训练集和验证集中,临床模型、放射组学模型和融合模型的曲线下面积(AUC)值均超过了 0.900。在外部测试集中,临床模型、放射组学模型和融合模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.88、1.00、0.88、1.00 和 0.88:肝囊肿的 AUC 值分别为 0.88、1.00 和 1.00;肝血管瘤的 AUC 值分别为 0.81、0.90 和 0.97;肝脓肿的 AUC 值分别为 0.89、0.98 和 0.92;肝恶性肿瘤的 AUC 值分别为 0.23、0.80 和 0.93。外部检测队列中放射科医生对肝囊肿、血管瘤、恶性肿瘤和脓肿的诊断准确率分别为 0.96、0.60、0.79 和 0.66:基于无创放射组学和未增强 CT 图像临床特征的融合模型在区分肝局灶病变方面具有很高的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信