Cracking the Relation between Mass and 1P-star Fraction of Globular Clusters. II. The Masses in 1P and 2P Stars as a Second Tool

Geneviève Parmentier
{"title":"Cracking the Relation between Mass and 1P-star Fraction of Globular Clusters. II. The Masses in 1P and 2P Stars as a Second Tool","authors":"Geneviève Parmentier","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Galactic globular clusters contain two main groups of stars, the pristine or 1P stars, and the polluted or 2P stars. The pristine-star fraction in clusters, F1P, is a decreasing function of the cluster present-day mass, mprst. Paper I has introduced a model mapping the region of the (mprst, F1P) space occupied by clusters, with the cluster mass threshold for 2P-star formation a key building block. We now expand this model to the pristine-star fraction in dependence of the pristine- and polluted-population masses. A. P. Milone et al. found that F1P anticorrelates more tightly with the polluted-population present-day mass, m2P,prst, than with the cluster total mass, mprst. By contrast, F1P anticorrelates poorly with the pristine-population current mass, m1P,prst. We show the loose anticorrelation between F1P and m1P,prst to result from a roughly constant pristine-population mass in clusters as they start their long-term evolution in the Galactic tidal field. As for the tight anticorrelation between m2P,prst and F1P, it stems from the initially shallow relation between m2P and F1P. Clusters of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC, respectively) appear to behave unexpectedly with respect to each other. For a given F1P, LMC clusters are more massive than SMC clusters despite their enduring a stronger tidal field. This is opposite to how the Galactic outer- and inner-halo clusters behave. The explanation may lie in cluster formation conditions. Finally, we wonder whether the single-population clusters NGC 419 and Rup 106 formed as multiple-population clusters.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad85d7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Galactic globular clusters contain two main groups of stars, the pristine or 1P stars, and the polluted or 2P stars. The pristine-star fraction in clusters, F1P, is a decreasing function of the cluster present-day mass, mprst. Paper I has introduced a model mapping the region of the (mprst, F1P) space occupied by clusters, with the cluster mass threshold for 2P-star formation a key building block. We now expand this model to the pristine-star fraction in dependence of the pristine- and polluted-population masses. A. P. Milone et al. found that F1P anticorrelates more tightly with the polluted-population present-day mass, m2P,prst, than with the cluster total mass, mprst. By contrast, F1P anticorrelates poorly with the pristine-population current mass, m1P,prst. We show the loose anticorrelation between F1P and m1P,prst to result from a roughly constant pristine-population mass in clusters as they start their long-term evolution in the Galactic tidal field. As for the tight anticorrelation between m2P,prst and F1P, it stems from the initially shallow relation between m2P and F1P. Clusters of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC, respectively) appear to behave unexpectedly with respect to each other. For a given F1P, LMC clusters are more massive than SMC clusters despite their enduring a stronger tidal field. This is opposite to how the Galactic outer- and inner-halo clusters behave. The explanation may lie in cluster formation conditions. Finally, we wonder whether the single-population clusters NGC 419 and Rup 106 formed as multiple-population clusters.
破解球状星团质量与 1P 星比例之间的关系。II.以 1P 和 2P 恒星的质量为第二工具
银河系球状星团包含两大类恒星,一类是纯净恒星或 1P 恒星,另一类是受污染恒星或 2P 恒星。星团中的质星比例 F1P 是星团现质量 mprst 的递减函数。论文 I 介绍了一个绘制星团所占 (mprst, F1P) 空间区域的模型,其中 2P 星形成的星团质量阈值是一个关键的构件。现在我们将这一模型扩展到棱柱星分数与棱柱星和污染星群质量的关系。A. P. Milone 等人发现,与星团总质量 mprst 相比,F1P 与污染星群现今质量 m2P,prst 的反相关性更为紧密。相比之下,F1P 与棱镜星群当前质量 m1P,prst 的反相关性较差。我们发现,F1P与m1P,prst之间的松散反相关性是由于星团在银河系潮汐场中开始长期演化时,其棱柱群质量大致恒定。至于 m2P,prst 和 F1P 之间的紧密反相关关系,则源于 m2P 和 F1P 之间最初的肤浅关系。大麦哲伦云团和小麦哲伦云团(分别为 LMC 和 SMC)之间的关系似乎出乎意料。在给定 F1P 的情况下,尽管 LMC 星团承受着更强的潮汐场,但它们的质量却比 SMC 星团大。这与银河系外光环星团和内光环星团的表现相反。原因可能在于星团的形成条件。最后,我们想知道单种群星团NGC 419和Rup 106是否是以多种群星团的形式形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信