Functional Outcomes and Complications of Carotid Tandem Lesions After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Treatment of Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke.

Colin Scott, Lena Abdulrahman, Mackenzie Snyder, Lidia Castillo, Jeffrey Lu, Eleanor Dunlap, Khanjan Nagarsheth
{"title":"Functional Outcomes and Complications of Carotid Tandem Lesions After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Treatment of Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke.","authors":"Colin Scott, Lena Abdulrahman, Mackenzie Snyder, Lidia Castillo, Jeffrey Lu, Eleanor Dunlap, Khanjan Nagarsheth","doi":"10.1177/15385744241301494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) stroke patients with tandem lesions (TLs) have been observed to have worse outcomes when compared to patients with simple isolated intracranial occlusions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the difference in post-operative functional status at discharge for patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for an acute LVO stroke based on the presence of a tandem carotid lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of 589 patients presenting within the first 24 hours of stroke onset who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The primary outcome was functional status quantified by modified Rankin Score (mRS) at time of discharge. The secondary outcomes were presence of hemorrhagic conversion, midline shift >5 cm, malignant cerebral edema, reocclusion, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Scale (TICI), and discharge location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with tandem occlusions and those with isolated intracranial lesions had similar baseline demographics. However, in patients with TLs, there was a significantly higher NIH stroke scale at admission and a longer time to recanalization. Modified Rankin Score prior to admission was similar for both groups, but was significantly higher in patients with TLs at discharge. The secondary outcomes were similar for hemorrhagic conversion, discharge to hospice, and a TICI scale of 0, but were significantly worse for patients with TLs for in-hospital mortality, midline shift >5 mm, and malignant cerebral edema. The presence of a tandem lesion predicted a higher modified Rankin Score at discharge in univariate regression modeling (β = .45; <i>P</i>-value = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two groups were similar in baseline characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors, yet patients with tandem carotid lesions experienced more complications during their hospitalization and had greater functional disability at discharge. Patients with a TL had a longer mean time to recanalization, representing a potential explanation for these differences in outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744241301494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241301494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) stroke patients with tandem lesions (TLs) have been observed to have worse outcomes when compared to patients with simple isolated intracranial occlusions.

Objective: To examine the difference in post-operative functional status at discharge for patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for an acute LVO stroke based on the presence of a tandem carotid lesion.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 589 patients presenting within the first 24 hours of stroke onset who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The primary outcome was functional status quantified by modified Rankin Score (mRS) at time of discharge. The secondary outcomes were presence of hemorrhagic conversion, midline shift >5 cm, malignant cerebral edema, reocclusion, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Scale (TICI), and discharge location.

Results: Patients with tandem occlusions and those with isolated intracranial lesions had similar baseline demographics. However, in patients with TLs, there was a significantly higher NIH stroke scale at admission and a longer time to recanalization. Modified Rankin Score prior to admission was similar for both groups, but was significantly higher in patients with TLs at discharge. The secondary outcomes were similar for hemorrhagic conversion, discharge to hospice, and a TICI scale of 0, but were significantly worse for patients with TLs for in-hospital mortality, midline shift >5 mm, and malignant cerebral edema. The presence of a tandem lesion predicted a higher modified Rankin Score at discharge in univariate regression modeling (β = .45; P-value = .006).

Conclusion: The two groups were similar in baseline characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors, yet patients with tandem carotid lesions experienced more complications during their hospitalization and had greater functional disability at discharge. Patients with a TL had a longer mean time to recanalization, representing a potential explanation for these differences in outcomes.

用机械取栓术治疗大血管闭塞性卒中后颈动脉串联病变的功能预后和并发症
背景:据观察,与单纯孤立性颅内闭塞患者相比,有串联病变(TL)的大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中患者的预后较差:目的:根据颈动脉串联病变的存在情况,研究接受机械取栓术治疗的急性 LVO 脑卒中患者出院时术后功能状态的差异:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是中风发生后 24 小时内就诊并接受机械性血栓切除术的 589 名患者。主要结果是出院时的功能状态,以改良Rankin评分(mRS)量化。次要结果为是否有出血转化、中线移位>5厘米、恶性脑水肿、再闭塞、脑梗塞溶栓量表(TICI)和出院地点:结果:串联闭塞患者和孤立颅内病变患者的基线人口统计学特征相似。然而,串联闭塞患者入院时的NIH卒中量表明显更高,再通时间更长。两组患者入院前的修正 Rankin 评分相似,但 TL 患者出院时的修正 Rankin 评分明显更高。出血性转归、出院安宁疗护和 TICI 评分为 0 的次要结果相似,但有 TL 的患者在院内死亡率、中线移位 >5 mm 和恶性脑水肿方面明显更差。在单变量回归模型中,串联病变的存在预示着出院时的改良Rankin评分更高(β = .45;P值 = .006):结论:两组患者的基线特征和心血管风险因素相似,但串联颈动脉病变患者在住院期间经历的并发症更多,出院时的功能残疾程度更高。颈动脉串联病变患者的平均再通时间更长,这可能是造成这些结果差异的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信