Multimodal brain age indicators of internalising problems in early adolescence: A longitudinal investigation.

Niamh MacSweeney, Dani Beck, Lucy Whitmore, Kathryn L Mills, Lars T Westlye, Tilmann von Soest, Lia Ferschmann, Christian K Tamnes
{"title":"Multimodal brain age indicators of internalising problems in early adolescence: A longitudinal investigation.","authors":"Niamh MacSweeney, Dani Beck, Lucy Whitmore, Kathryn L Mills, Lars T Westlye, Tilmann von Soest, Lia Ferschmann, Christian K Tamnes","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescence is a time of increased risk for the onset of internalising problems, particularly in females. However, how individual differences in brain maturation relate to the increased vulnerability for internalising problems in adolescence remains poorly understood due to a scarcity of longitudinal studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study data, we examined longitudinal associations between multimodal brain age and youth internalising problems. Brain age models were trained, validated, and tested independently on T1-weighted (T1; N=9523), diffusion tensor (DTI; N=8834), and resting-state functional (rs-fMRI; N=8233) MRI data at baseline (M<sub>age</sub>= 9.9 years) and 2-year follow-up (M<sub>age</sub>= 11.9 years). Self-reported internalising problems were measured at 3-year follow-up (M<sub>age</sub>= 12.9 years) using the Brief Problem Monitor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Latent change score models demonstrated that although brain age gap (BAG) at baseline was not related to later internalising problems, an increase in BAG between timepoints was positively associated with internalising problems at 3-year follow-up in females but not males. This association between an increasing BAG and higher internalising problems was observed in the T1 (β = 0.067, SE = 0.050, p<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.020) and rs-fMRI β = 0.090, SE = 0.025, p<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.007) models but not DTI (β=-0.002, SE=0.053, p<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.932), and remained significant when accounting for earlier internalising problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A greater increase in BAG in early adolescence may reflect the heightened vulnerability shown by female youth to internalising problems. Longitudinal research is necessary to understand if this increasing BAG signifies accelerated brain development and its relationship to the trajectory of internalising problems throughout adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a time of increased risk for the onset of internalising problems, particularly in females. However, how individual differences in brain maturation relate to the increased vulnerability for internalising problems in adolescence remains poorly understood due to a scarcity of longitudinal studies.

Methods: Using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study data, we examined longitudinal associations between multimodal brain age and youth internalising problems. Brain age models were trained, validated, and tested independently on T1-weighted (T1; N=9523), diffusion tensor (DTI; N=8834), and resting-state functional (rs-fMRI; N=8233) MRI data at baseline (Mage= 9.9 years) and 2-year follow-up (Mage= 11.9 years). Self-reported internalising problems were measured at 3-year follow-up (Mage= 12.9 years) using the Brief Problem Monitor.

Results: Latent change score models demonstrated that although brain age gap (BAG) at baseline was not related to later internalising problems, an increase in BAG between timepoints was positively associated with internalising problems at 3-year follow-up in females but not males. This association between an increasing BAG and higher internalising problems was observed in the T1 (β = 0.067, SE = 0.050, pFDR = 0.020) and rs-fMRI β = 0.090, SE = 0.025, pFDR = 0.007) models but not DTI (β=-0.002, SE=0.053, pFDR = 0.932), and remained significant when accounting for earlier internalising problems.

Conclusions: A greater increase in BAG in early adolescence may reflect the heightened vulnerability shown by female youth to internalising problems. Longitudinal research is necessary to understand if this increasing BAG signifies accelerated brain development and its relationship to the trajectory of internalising problems throughout adolescence.

青少年早期内化问题的多模态脑龄指标:纵向调查
背景:青春期是内化问题发病风险增加的时期,尤其是女性。然而,由于缺乏纵向研究,人们对大脑成熟过程中的个体差异与青春期内化问题易发性之间的关系仍然知之甚少:方法:我们利用青少年脑认知发展(ABCD)研究数据,研究了多模态脑年龄与青少年内化问题之间的纵向联系。在基线(Mage=9.9岁)和2年随访(Mage=11.9岁)时,对T1加权(T1;N=9523)、弥散张量(DTI;N=8834)和静息态功能(rs-fMRI;N=8233)磁共振成像数据对脑年龄模型进行了独立训练、验证和测试。在 3 年随访(年龄= 12.9 岁)期间,使用简明问题监测表测量了自我报告的内化问题:潜在变化得分模型显示,虽然基线时的脑龄差距(BAG)与后来的内化问题无关,但在3年的随访中,女性脑龄差距的增加与内化问题呈正相关,而男性则不然。在T1(β=0.067,SE=0.050,pFDR=0.020)和rs-fMRI(β=0.090,SE=0.025,pFDR=0.007)模型中观察到了BAG增加与内化问题增加之间的关系,但在DTI(β=-0.002,SE=0.053,pFDR=0.932)模型中没有观察到这种关系:结论:BAG在青春期早期增幅较大,这可能反映出女性青少年更容易出现内化问题。有必要进行纵向研究,以了解 BAG 的增加是否意味着大脑发育的加速,及其与整个青春期内化问题轨迹的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信