Jaime Gosálvez, Stephen D Johnston, Ahinoa Prado, Carmen López-Fernández, Pablo Contreras, Javier Bartolomé-Nebreda, Mercedes González-Martínez, José Luis Fernández, Carlos García de la Vega, Alfredo Góngora
{"title":"Strong correlation between double-strand DNA Breaks and total sperm DNA fragmentation in the human ejaculate.","authors":"Jaime Gosálvez, Stephen D Johnston, Ahinoa Prado, Carmen López-Fernández, Pablo Contreras, Javier Bartolomé-Nebreda, Mercedes González-Martínez, José Luis Fernández, Carlos García de la Vega, Alfredo Góngora","doi":"10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.103122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Double- and single-strand DNA breaks (DSBs and SSBs, respectively) in spermatozoa, which emerge from intrinsic and extrinsic degenerative processes, are likely related to the underlying male pathology.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether the incidence of DSBs in the human ejaculate is a consistent predictor of whole sperm DNA fragmentation (W-SDF = SSBs + DSBs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A correlation between the proportion of spermatozoa that showed whole W-SDF and those displaying only DSBs in DNA. Two patient cohorts were established: W-SDF ≤30% (low SDF; n = 153) and W-SDF ≥30% (high SDF; n = 222).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increasing level of W-SDF is associated with an increased incidence of DSBs in the ejaculate. When data from both the low and high W-SDF groups were combined, a linear relationship was observed, with DSBs increasing by 0.799 units for each unit increase in W-SDF. However, when the cohorts were analyzed separately, the relationships differed. In the low SDF group, DSBs increased linearly by 0.559 units for each unit increase in W-SDF. In the high SDF group, DSBs increased exponentially by 0.602 units per unit of W-SDF. Furthermore, the data dispersion between the two variables was significantly different between the cohorts, with the high SDF group showing 0.8 times greater variability than the low SDF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the presence of DSBs in sperm is correlated with the W-SDF present in raw semen samples, the biological mechanisms responsible for DSBs are expressed in different proportions and/or at different levels in ejaculates with higher levels of DNA damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":93881,"journal":{"name":"Archives of medical research","volume":"55 8","pages":"103122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.103122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Double- and single-strand DNA breaks (DSBs and SSBs, respectively) in spermatozoa, which emerge from intrinsic and extrinsic degenerative processes, are likely related to the underlying male pathology.
Aim: To determine whether the incidence of DSBs in the human ejaculate is a consistent predictor of whole sperm DNA fragmentation (W-SDF = SSBs + DSBs).
Methods: A correlation between the proportion of spermatozoa that showed whole W-SDF and those displaying only DSBs in DNA. Two patient cohorts were established: W-SDF ≤30% (low SDF; n = 153) and W-SDF ≥30% (high SDF; n = 222).
Results: An increasing level of W-SDF is associated with an increased incidence of DSBs in the ejaculate. When data from both the low and high W-SDF groups were combined, a linear relationship was observed, with DSBs increasing by 0.799 units for each unit increase in W-SDF. However, when the cohorts were analyzed separately, the relationships differed. In the low SDF group, DSBs increased linearly by 0.559 units for each unit increase in W-SDF. In the high SDF group, DSBs increased exponentially by 0.602 units per unit of W-SDF. Furthermore, the data dispersion between the two variables was significantly different between the cohorts, with the high SDF group showing 0.8 times greater variability than the low SDF group.
Conclusions: While the presence of DSBs in sperm is correlated with the W-SDF present in raw semen samples, the biological mechanisms responsible for DSBs are expressed in different proportions and/or at different levels in ejaculates with higher levels of DNA damage.