[Risk of postoperative delirium in older adults under balanced general anesthesia].

Basilia Anabel Cahuich-Rodríguez, Arlene Guadalupe Acosta-Mass, Héctor Isaac Rocha-González
{"title":"[Risk of postoperative delirium in older adults under balanced general anesthesia].","authors":"Basilia Anabel Cahuich-Rodríguez, Arlene Guadalupe Acosta-Mass, Héctor Isaac Rocha-González","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13381460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthetic depth can influence the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD). This depth is related to the potency of the volatile anesthetics used to maintain balanced general anesthesia. This potency is measured by means of the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). In older adults, it is unknown which MAC is associated with the risk of POD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risk of POD associated with minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) levels of volatile anesthetics in older adults who received balanced general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was carried out with 119 patients, aged ≥ 60 years, with 0 points in the 4 \"As\" test (4AT), without neurological or psychiatric diseases. During the intraoperative period, the CAM provided was recorded, and in the postoperative period, the presence of emergency with delirium and/or POD was evaluated at 2 and 24 hours, considering a score ≥ 4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A longer hospital stay was found in the group that received a MAC ≥0.9. The incidence of POD was 29.4%. Those who received a MAC ≥ 0.9 had an RR of 2.22 (95%CI: 1.2-4.2) of presenting POD. An adjusted logistic regression model was performed with the variables female sex (OR: 4, 95%CI: 1.5-10.4), ASA physical status 3-4 (OR: 3.7, 95%CI: 1.5-9) and MAC ≥ 0.9 (OR: 3.1 95%CI: 1.2-8) with an R2: 0.26 and a constant of 3.005.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAC ≥ 0.9 represents a risk factor for DPO, so individualized dosing of volatile anesthetics should be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":"62 6","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13381460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anesthetic depth can influence the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD). This depth is related to the potency of the volatile anesthetics used to maintain balanced general anesthesia. This potency is measured by means of the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). In older adults, it is unknown which MAC is associated with the risk of POD.

Objective: To estimate the risk of POD associated with minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) levels of volatile anesthetics in older adults who received balanced general anesthesia.

Material and methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out with 119 patients, aged ≥ 60 years, with 0 points in the 4 "As" test (4AT), without neurological or psychiatric diseases. During the intraoperative period, the CAM provided was recorded, and in the postoperative period, the presence of emergency with delirium and/or POD was evaluated at 2 and 24 hours, considering a score ≥ 4.

Results: A longer hospital stay was found in the group that received a MAC ≥0.9. The incidence of POD was 29.4%. Those who received a MAC ≥ 0.9 had an RR of 2.22 (95%CI: 1.2-4.2) of presenting POD. An adjusted logistic regression model was performed with the variables female sex (OR: 4, 95%CI: 1.5-10.4), ASA physical status 3-4 (OR: 3.7, 95%CI: 1.5-9) and MAC ≥ 0.9 (OR: 3.1 95%CI: 1.2-8) with an R2: 0.26 and a constant of 3.005.

Conclusions: MAC ≥ 0.9 represents a risk factor for DPO, so individualized dosing of volatile anesthetics should be used.

[平衡全身麻醉下老年人术后谵妄的风险]。
背景:麻醉深度会影响术后谵妄(POD)的发生率。麻醉深度与用于维持全身麻醉平衡的挥发性麻醉剂的效力有关。这种效力是通过最小肺泡浓度 (MAC) 来测量的。在老年人中,哪种 MAC 与 POD 风险相关尚不清楚:估计接受平衡全身麻醉的老年人中与最低肺泡浓度(MAC)水平相关的 POD 风险:对 119 名年龄≥ 60 岁、4 "As "测试(4AT)为 0 分、无神经或精神疾病的患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。术中记录了所提供的 CAM,术后 2 小时和 24 小时评估了是否出现谵妄和/或 POD 急症,考虑评分≥ 4 分:结果发现,MAC≥0.9 的组住院时间更长。POD 发生率为 29.4%。MAC≥0.9的患者出现POD的RR为2.22(95%CI:1.2-4.2)。以女性性别(OR:4,95%CI:1.5-10.4)、ASA 体力状态 3-4(OR:3.7,95%CI:1.5-9)和 MAC ≥ 0.9(OR:3.1 95%CI:1.2-8)为变量建立了调整后的逻辑回归模型,R2 为 0.26,常数为 3:0.26,常数为 3.005.结论:MAC≥0.9是DPO的一个风险因素,因此应使用个体化的挥发性麻醉剂剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信