Hendrik H.G. Hansen , Alies H.M. Bekkers , Inge C.L. van den Munckhof , Eveline van der Kolk , Frederick J.A. Meijer , Marinette van der Graaf , Joost H.W. Rutten , Chris L. de Korte
{"title":"Ultrasound Strain Imaging for Characterizing Atherosclerotic Plaque in the Carotid Arteries of Asymptomatic Subjects","authors":"Hendrik H.G. Hansen , Alies H.M. Bekkers , Inge C.L. van den Munckhof , Eveline van der Kolk , Frederick J.A. Meijer , Marinette van der Graaf , Joost H.W. Rutten , Chris L. de Korte","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The rupture of vulnerable plaques in the carotid artery is a leading cause of strokes. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for quantifying plaque composition, its high costs and lengthy procedure times limit large-scale use. Compound ultrasound strain imaging (CUSI) ultrasound offers a non-invasively alternative by assessing tissue deformation/strain within the arterial wall. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between strain values and plaque composition, primarily focusing on longitudinal acquisitions, which only image the proximal and distal parts of the wall. This study examines CUSI in transverse imaging planes, which enables visualization of the entire cross-section of the vessel wall. CUSI has already been validated on a symptomatic population. Therefore, the aim is to determine whether CUSI can differentiate plaque composition in asymptomatic individuals with an increased cardiovascular risk profile, validated by MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included 42 plaques in 28 participants. Ultrasound data were acquired with a Samsung Medison Accuvix V10 with an L5-13IS transducer and RF-interface. An experienced neuroradiologist classified plaques with MRI using the Siemens 3.0T MAGNETOM Skyra MRI (Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated coil. Strain differences were compared across four plaque categories (calcified, lipid, hemorrhagic, fibrous/aspecific) and for vulnerable versus stable plaques.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A difference in strain values was found between lipid and calcified plaques (Kruskal–Wallis test, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Additionally, vulnerable plaques exhibited higher strain values than stable plaques (independent samples test, <em>p</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CUSI values differ between lipid and calcified and between stable and vulnerable plaques. Minor differences were found between the other plaque types.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 2","pages":"Pages 321-329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The rupture of vulnerable plaques in the carotid artery is a leading cause of strokes. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for quantifying plaque composition, its high costs and lengthy procedure times limit large-scale use. Compound ultrasound strain imaging (CUSI) ultrasound offers a non-invasively alternative by assessing tissue deformation/strain within the arterial wall. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between strain values and plaque composition, primarily focusing on longitudinal acquisitions, which only image the proximal and distal parts of the wall. This study examines CUSI in transverse imaging planes, which enables visualization of the entire cross-section of the vessel wall. CUSI has already been validated on a symptomatic population. Therefore, the aim is to determine whether CUSI can differentiate plaque composition in asymptomatic individuals with an increased cardiovascular risk profile, validated by MRI.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included 42 plaques in 28 participants. Ultrasound data were acquired with a Samsung Medison Accuvix V10 with an L5-13IS transducer and RF-interface. An experienced neuroradiologist classified plaques with MRI using the Siemens 3.0T MAGNETOM Skyra MRI (Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated coil. Strain differences were compared across four plaque categories (calcified, lipid, hemorrhagic, fibrous/aspecific) and for vulnerable versus stable plaques.
Results
A difference in strain values was found between lipid and calcified plaques (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.05). Additionally, vulnerable plaques exhibited higher strain values than stable plaques (independent samples test, p < 0.05).
Conclusion
CUSI values differ between lipid and calcified and between stable and vulnerable plaques. Minor differences were found between the other plaque types.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.