Adjunctive Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Subdural Hematoma.

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jason M Davies, Jared Knopman, Maxim Mokin, Ameer E Hassan, Robert E Harbaugh, Alexander Khalessi, Jens Fiehler, Bradley A Gross, Ramesh Grandhi, Jason Tarpley, Walavan Sivakumar, Mark Bain, R Webster Crowley, Thomas W Link, Justin F Fraser, Michael R Levitt, Peng Roc Chen, Ricardo A Hanel, Joe D Bernard, Mouhammad Jumaa, Patrick Youssef, Marshall C Cress, Mohammad Imran Chaudry, Hakeem J Shakir, Walter S Lesley, Joshua Billingsley, Jesse Jones, Matthew J Koch, Alexandra R Paul, William J Mack, Joshua W Osbun, Kathleen Dlouhy, Jonathan A Grossberg, Christopher P Kellner, Daniel H Sahlein, Justin Santarelli, Clemens M Schirmer, Justin Singer, Jesse J Liu, Aniel Q Majjhoo, Thomas Wolfe, Neil V Patel, Christopher Roark, Adnan H Siddiqui
{"title":"Adjunctive Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Subdural Hematoma.","authors":"Jason M Davies, Jared Knopman, Maxim Mokin, Ameer E Hassan, Robert E Harbaugh, Alexander Khalessi, Jens Fiehler, Bradley A Gross, Ramesh Grandhi, Jason Tarpley, Walavan Sivakumar, Mark Bain, R Webster Crowley, Thomas W Link, Justin F Fraser, Michael R Levitt, Peng Roc Chen, Ricardo A Hanel, Joe D Bernard, Mouhammad Jumaa, Patrick Youssef, Marshall C Cress, Mohammad Imran Chaudry, Hakeem J Shakir, Walter S Lesley, Joshua Billingsley, Jesse Jones, Matthew J Koch, Alexandra R Paul, William J Mack, Joshua W Osbun, Kathleen Dlouhy, Jonathan A Grossberg, Christopher P Kellner, Daniel H Sahlein, Justin Santarelli, Clemens M Schirmer, Justin Singer, Jesse J Liu, Aniel Q Majjhoo, Thomas Wolfe, Neil V Patel, Christopher Roark, Adnan H Siddiqui","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2313472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subacute and chronic subdural hematomas are common and frequently recur after surgical evacuation. The effect of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization on the risk of reoperation remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective, multicenter, interventional, adaptive-design trial, we randomly assigned patients with symptomatic subacute or chronic subdural hematoma with an indication for surgical evacuation to undergo middle meningeal artery embolization plus surgery (treatment group) or surgery alone (control group). The primary end point was hematoma recurrence or progression that led to repeat surgery within 90 days after the index treatment. The clinical secondary end point was deterioration of neurologic function at 90 days, which was assessed with the modified Rankin scale in a noninferiority analysis (margin for risk difference, 15 percentage points).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 197 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 203 to the control group. Surgery occurred before randomization in 136 of 400 patients (34.0%). Hematoma recurrence or progression leading to repeat surgery occurred in 8 patients (4.1%) in the treatment group, as compared with 23 patients (11.3%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.80; P = 0.008). Functional deterioration occurred in 11.9% of the patients in the treatment group and in 9.8% of those in the control group (risk difference, 2.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.8 to 8.9). Mortality at 90 days was 5.1% in the treatment group and 3.0% in the control group. By 30 days, serious adverse events related to the embolization procedure had occurred in 4 patients (2.0%) in the treatment group, including disabling stroke in 2 patients; no additional events had occurred by 180 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with symptomatic subacute or chronic subdural hematoma with an indication for surgical evacuation, middle meningeal artery embolization plus surgery was associated with a lower risk of hematoma recurrence or progression leading to reoperation than surgery alone. Further study is needed to evaluate the safety of middle meningeal artery embolization in the management of subdural hematoma. (Funded by Medtronic; EMBOLISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04402632.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"391 20","pages":"1890-1900"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2313472","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subacute and chronic subdural hematomas are common and frequently recur after surgical evacuation. The effect of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization on the risk of reoperation remains unclear.

Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, interventional, adaptive-design trial, we randomly assigned patients with symptomatic subacute or chronic subdural hematoma with an indication for surgical evacuation to undergo middle meningeal artery embolization plus surgery (treatment group) or surgery alone (control group). The primary end point was hematoma recurrence or progression that led to repeat surgery within 90 days after the index treatment. The clinical secondary end point was deterioration of neurologic function at 90 days, which was assessed with the modified Rankin scale in a noninferiority analysis (margin for risk difference, 15 percentage points).

Results: A total of 197 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 203 to the control group. Surgery occurred before randomization in 136 of 400 patients (34.0%). Hematoma recurrence or progression leading to repeat surgery occurred in 8 patients (4.1%) in the treatment group, as compared with 23 patients (11.3%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.80; P = 0.008). Functional deterioration occurred in 11.9% of the patients in the treatment group and in 9.8% of those in the control group (risk difference, 2.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.8 to 8.9). Mortality at 90 days was 5.1% in the treatment group and 3.0% in the control group. By 30 days, serious adverse events related to the embolization procedure had occurred in 4 patients (2.0%) in the treatment group, including disabling stroke in 2 patients; no additional events had occurred by 180 days.

Conclusions: Among patients with symptomatic subacute or chronic subdural hematoma with an indication for surgical evacuation, middle meningeal artery embolization plus surgery was associated with a lower risk of hematoma recurrence or progression leading to reoperation than surgery alone. Further study is needed to evaluate the safety of middle meningeal artery embolization in the management of subdural hematoma. (Funded by Medtronic; EMBOLISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04402632.).

辅助性脑膜中动脉栓塞治疗硬膜下血肿
背景:亚急性和慢性硬膜下血肿很常见,手术清除后经常复发。辅助性脑膜中动脉栓塞术对再次手术风险的影响仍不明确:在一项前瞻性、多中心、介入性、适应性设计的试验中,我们随机分配有症状的亚急性或慢性硬膜下血肿且有手术清除指征的患者接受脑膜中动脉栓塞术加手术(治疗组)或单纯手术(对照组)。主要终点是治疗后90天内血肿复发或进展,导致再次手术。临床次要终点是90天后神经功能的恶化,在非劣效性分析中采用改良Rankin量表进行评估(风险差异幅度为15个百分点):共有197名患者被随机分配到治疗组,203名患者被随机分配到对照组。400 名患者中有 136 人(34.0%)在随机分配前接受了手术。治疗组有 8 名患者(4.1%)因血肿复发或进展而再次接受手术,对照组有 23 名患者(11.3%)因血肿复发或进展而再次接受手术(相对风险为 0.36;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.11 至 0.80;P = 0.008)。治疗组中有 11.9% 的患者出现功能衰退,对照组中则有 9.8% 的患者出现功能衰退(风险差异为 2.1 个百分点;95% CI,-4.8 至 8.9)。治疗组 90 天的死亡率为 5.1%,对照组为 3.0%。到30天时,治疗组有4名患者(2.0%)发生了与栓塞手术相关的严重不良事件,其中2名患者发生了致残性中风;到180天时,没有发生其他不良事件:结论:在有手术清除指征的无症状亚急性或慢性硬膜下血肿患者中,脑膜中动脉栓塞加手术治疗比单纯手术治疗血肿复发或进展导致再次手术的风险更低。需要进一步研究评估脑膜中动脉栓塞治疗硬膜下血肿的安全性。(由美敦力公司资助;EMBOLISE ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT04402632)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信