Ultra-low contrast strategy for routine coronary procedures via distal transradial access: real-world experience with consecutive all-comers patients from the DISTRACTION registry.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Marcos Danillo Oliveira, Adriano Caixeta
{"title":"Ultra-low contrast strategy for routine coronary procedures via distal transradial access: real-world experience with consecutive all-comers patients from the DISTRACTION registry.","authors":"Marcos Danillo Oliveira, Adriano Caixeta","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The association of contrast volume to the risk of contrast-related acute kidney injury (CR-AKI) appears to have resulted in a change in daily practice toward using lower contrast volume for all patients. Distal transradial access (dTRA) has advantages in terms of faster haemostasis and lower rates of proximal radial artery occlusion. The present study aimed to describe the authors' experience with the combination of ultra-low contrast (ULC) strategy and dTRA for routine coronary procedures in a real-world and broad population of all-comers patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 6852 patients consecutively included into the DISTRACTION registry from February 2019 to July 2024, successful ULC coronary procedures via dTRA were achieved in 4328 (63.2%). Related data were retrospectively assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients were male with acute coronary syndromes, and the mean patient age was 63.6 ± 15 years. Access-site crossover occurred in only 3% of cases. Right dTRA was the most frequently utilized primary access site, and was almost always performed with standard 6-French radial sheaths. ULC strategy was feasible for every scenario, with the overall contrast volume less than or equal to 40 mL for 96.4% of all patients, regardless of coronary bypass surgical grafts presence, percutaneous coronary intervention immediately following coronary angiography, anatomical or clinical complexity, or unavailability of intravascular ultrasound guidance. Neither major complications nor major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events directly related to dTRA were recorded. The rates of CR-AKI were very low (1.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When performed by experienced operators, the minimalist combination of ULC strategy and dTRA for routine coronary procedures, regardless of baseline creatinine clearance, appears to be safe and feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The association of contrast volume to the risk of contrast-related acute kidney injury (CR-AKI) appears to have resulted in a change in daily practice toward using lower contrast volume for all patients. Distal transradial access (dTRA) has advantages in terms of faster haemostasis and lower rates of proximal radial artery occlusion. The present study aimed to describe the authors' experience with the combination of ultra-low contrast (ULC) strategy and dTRA for routine coronary procedures in a real-world and broad population of all-comers patients.

Methods: Of 6852 patients consecutively included into the DISTRACTION registry from February 2019 to July 2024, successful ULC coronary procedures via dTRA were achieved in 4328 (63.2%). Related data were retrospectively assessed.

Results: Most patients were male with acute coronary syndromes, and the mean patient age was 63.6 ± 15 years. Access-site crossover occurred in only 3% of cases. Right dTRA was the most frequently utilized primary access site, and was almost always performed with standard 6-French radial sheaths. ULC strategy was feasible for every scenario, with the overall contrast volume less than or equal to 40 mL for 96.4% of all patients, regardless of coronary bypass surgical grafts presence, percutaneous coronary intervention immediately following coronary angiography, anatomical or clinical complexity, or unavailability of intravascular ultrasound guidance. Neither major complications nor major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events directly related to dTRA were recorded. The rates of CR-AKI were very low (1.1%).

Conclusions: When performed by experienced operators, the minimalist combination of ULC strategy and dTRA for routine coronary procedures, regardless of baseline creatinine clearance, appears to be safe and feasible.

经桡动脉远端入路常规冠状动脉手术的超低造影剂策略:来自 DISTRACTION 登记处的连续全麻患者的实际经验。
目的:造影剂用量与造影剂相关急性肾损伤(CR-AKI)风险之间的关联似乎已导致日常实践向所有患者使用较低造影剂用量的方向转变。经桡动脉远端入路(dTRA)具有止血更快、桡动脉近端闭塞率更低的优点。本研究旨在描述作者将超低造影剂(ULC)策略和经桡动脉远端入路(dTRA)结合用于常规冠状动脉手术的经验:在2019年2月至2024年7月期间连续纳入DISTRACTION注册的6852名患者中,有4328人(63.2%)通过dTRA成功完成了ULC冠状动脉手术。对相关数据进行了回顾性评估:大多数患者为急性冠状动脉综合征男性患者,平均年龄为(63.6 ± 15)岁。仅有 3% 的病例发生入路交叉。右侧 dTRA 是最常用的主要入路部位,几乎总是使用标准的 6 法分桡动脉鞘。无论是否存在冠状动脉旁路手术移植物、冠状动脉造影术后是否立即进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、解剖或临床复杂性或是否无法获得血管内超声引导,ULC 策略在任何情况下都是可行的,96.4% 的患者的总造影剂量小于或等于 40 毫升。没有记录与 dTRA 直接相关的重大并发症或重大脑血管和心脏不良事件。CR-AKI的发生率非常低(1.1%):结论:由经验丰富的操作者进行常规冠状动脉手术时,无论基线肌酐清除率如何,ULC策略和dTRA的最小化组合似乎都是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信