External validation of the OAC3-PAD risk score after endovascular revascularisation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kevin Pelicon, Klemen Petek, Anja Boc, Nataša Kejžar, Aleš Blinc, Vinko Boc
{"title":"External validation of the OAC<sup>3</sup>-PAD risk score after endovascular revascularisation.","authors":"Kevin Pelicon, Klemen Petek, Anja Boc, Nataša Kejžar, Aleš Blinc, Vinko Boc","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> The OAC<sup>3</sup>-PAD bleeding risk score was developed to assess the bleeding risk in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), however its performance in patients treated exclusively with endovascular revascularisation has not yet been tested. We aimed to externally validate the bleeding risk score for this patient cohort. <i>Patients and methods:</i> A retrospective observational study, analysing the data of all PAD patients successfully treated with endovascular revascularisation in a single centre within a five-year period. The performance of the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model, upon which the OAC<sup>3</sup>-PAD bleeding risk score is based, was tested using calibration methods, discrimination, and a scaled Brier score for overall performance. The OAC<sup>3</sup>-PAD bleeding risk score was calculated for all patients, classifying them into the four respective risk groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for all risk groups and discrimination was tested using log-rank tests. <i>Results:</i> While discrimination of the CPH model was adequate, calibration of the model was poor and the scaled Brier score was 3.27% (95% CI 0.65%-4.40%). Of the 1,434 patients, 33 (2.3%) experienced a major bleeding event. The frequency of bleeding was 0.4% in the low risk group (3/736 patients), 0.8% in the low-to-moderate risk group (2/243 patients), 5.8% in the moderate-to-high risk group (15/258 patients), and 6.6% in the high risk group (13/197 patients). The OAC<sup>3</sup>-PAD score successfully discriminated each of the two lower bleeding risk groups from one of the two higher risk groups, but failed to discriminate among the two lower risk groups and the two higher risk groups, respectively. <i>Conclusions:</i> Although the OAC<sup>3</sup>-PAD score did not stratify patients into the four respective risk groups, it allowed discrimination between the low risk patients and the high risk patients. It could therefore become a useful tool for predicting major bleeding events in patients with PAD after endovascular revascularisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The OAC3-PAD bleeding risk score was developed to assess the bleeding risk in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), however its performance in patients treated exclusively with endovascular revascularisation has not yet been tested. We aimed to externally validate the bleeding risk score for this patient cohort. Patients and methods: A retrospective observational study, analysing the data of all PAD patients successfully treated with endovascular revascularisation in a single centre within a five-year period. The performance of the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model, upon which the OAC3-PAD bleeding risk score is based, was tested using calibration methods, discrimination, and a scaled Brier score for overall performance. The OAC3-PAD bleeding risk score was calculated for all patients, classifying them into the four respective risk groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for all risk groups and discrimination was tested using log-rank tests. Results: While discrimination of the CPH model was adequate, calibration of the model was poor and the scaled Brier score was 3.27% (95% CI 0.65%-4.40%). Of the 1,434 patients, 33 (2.3%) experienced a major bleeding event. The frequency of bleeding was 0.4% in the low risk group (3/736 patients), 0.8% in the low-to-moderate risk group (2/243 patients), 5.8% in the moderate-to-high risk group (15/258 patients), and 6.6% in the high risk group (13/197 patients). The OAC3-PAD score successfully discriminated each of the two lower bleeding risk groups from one of the two higher risk groups, but failed to discriminate among the two lower risk groups and the two higher risk groups, respectively. Conclusions: Although the OAC3-PAD score did not stratify patients into the four respective risk groups, it allowed discrimination between the low risk patients and the high risk patients. It could therefore become a useful tool for predicting major bleeding events in patients with PAD after endovascular revascularisation.

血管内再通术后 OAC3-PAD 风险评分的外部验证。
背景:OAC3-PAD出血风险评分是为评估外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的出血风险而开发的,但其在完全接受血管内再通治疗的患者中的表现尚未经过测试。我们的目的是对这一患者群体的出血风险评分进行外部验证。患者和方法:一项回顾性观察研究,分析了一个中心五年内所有成功接受血管内再通术治疗的 PAD 患者的数据。使用校准方法、区分度和整体性能的标度 Brier 评分测试了作为 OAC3-PAD 出血风险评分基础的 Cox 比例危险(CPH)模型的性能。计算了所有患者的 OAC3-PAD 出血风险评分,并将其分为四个相应的风险组。绘制了所有风险组的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,并使用对数秩检验测试了区分度。结果显示虽然 CPH 模型的辨别能力较强,但模型的校准能力较差,标度 Brier 评分为 3.27%(95% CI 0.65%-4.40%)。在 1434 名患者中,33 人(2.3%)发生了大出血。出血频率在低风险组为 0.4%(3/736 名患者),在中低风险组为 0.8%(2/243 名患者),在中高风险组为 5.8%(15/258 名患者),在高风险组为 6.6%(13/197 名患者)。OAC3-PAD 评分成功区分了两个较低出血风险组和两个较高风险组中的一个,但未能分别区分两个较低风险组和两个较高风险组。结论:虽然 OAC3-PAD 评分没有将患者分为四个相应的风险组,但它可以区分低风险患者和高风险患者。因此,它可以成为预测血管内血运重建术后 PAD 患者大出血事件的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信