Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in pediatric clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Veronika Bencheva, Nina-Kristin Mann, Tanja Rombey, Dawid Pieper, Sven Schmiedl
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in pediatric clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Veronika Bencheva, Nina-Kristin Mann, Tanja Rombey, Dawid Pieper, Sven Schmiedl","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02698-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recruiting a sufficient number of patients is often a challenge for conducting clinical trials. Published data reveal that only 10% of eligible patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled in clinical trials. Consequentially, identifying barriers and facilitators may improve enrollment. These factors may differ in the pediatric population, for example, due to the involvement of parents in the decision-making process. We aimed to conduct an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric participants in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search in PubMed and Epistemonikos of published systematic reviews focusing on barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials was conducted. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two authors independently. The methodological quality was judged using a critical appraisal tool. Finally, data were narratively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 283 identified systematic reviews, four met the inclusion criteria and were included in the overview. Parents belonging to an ethnic minority or having low socioeconomic status were identified as barriers to enrollment whereas higher parental education and higher age served as facilitators. Additionally, existing expectations, previous treatment experiences and preferences, study duration, type of control group, and the child's attitude toward study participation could favor or hinder participation. Furthermore, physicians' opinions of study-related treatments may also influence the enrollment process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This overview provides a summary of barriers and facilitators to the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials. Taking into account this information may enhance the enrollment of this hard-to-reach population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02698-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recruiting a sufficient number of patients is often a challenge for conducting clinical trials. Published data reveal that only 10% of eligible patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled in clinical trials. Consequentially, identifying barriers and facilitators may improve enrollment. These factors may differ in the pediatric population, for example, due to the involvement of parents in the decision-making process. We aimed to conduct an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric participants in clinical trials.

Methods: A systematic literature search in PubMed and Epistemonikos of published systematic reviews focusing on barriers and facilitators influencing the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials was conducted. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two authors independently. The methodological quality was judged using a critical appraisal tool. Finally, data were narratively synthesized.

Results: Of 283 identified systematic reviews, four met the inclusion criteria and were included in the overview. Parents belonging to an ethnic minority or having low socioeconomic status were identified as barriers to enrollment whereas higher parental education and higher age served as facilitators. Additionally, existing expectations, previous treatment experiences and preferences, study duration, type of control group, and the child's attitude toward study participation could favor or hinder participation. Furthermore, physicians' opinions of study-related treatments may also influence the enrollment process.

Conclusion: This overview provides a summary of barriers and facilitators to the enrollment of pediatric patients in clinical trials. Taking into account this information may enhance the enrollment of this hard-to-reach population.

参加儿科临床试验的障碍和促进因素:系统综述。
背景:招募足够数量的患者往往是开展临床试验的一项挑战。已公布的数据显示,只有 10% 符合纳入和排除标准的合格患者被纳入临床试验。因此,找出障碍和促进因素可能会提高注册率。这些因素在儿科人群中可能有所不同,例如,由于父母参与了决策过程。我们的目的是对系统综述进行概述,总结影响儿科参与者参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素:方法:我们在 PubMed 和 Epistemonikos 上对已发表的系统综述进行了系统性文献检索,重点关注影响儿科患者参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素。研究选择、数据提取和质量评估由两位作者独立完成。方法学质量采用批判性评价工具进行评判。最后,对数据进行叙述性综合:在已确定的 283 篇系统性综述中,有 4 篇符合纳入标准并被纳入综述。属于少数民族或社会经济地位较低的父母被认为是入学的障碍,而父母受教育程度较高和年龄较大则是入学的有利因素。此外,现有的期望、以往的治疗经验和偏好、研究持续时间、对照组的类型以及儿童对参与研究的态度都会对参与研究产生有利或不利的影响。此外,医生对与研究相关的治疗方法的看法也会影响入组过程:本文概述了儿科患者参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素。考虑到这些信息可能会提高这一难以接触人群的入组机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信