Evaluating pain management practices for cancer patients among health professionals in cancer and supportive/palliative care units: a Belgian survey.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Christel Fontaine, Isabelle Libert, Marie-Aline Echterbille, Vincent Bonhomme, Jacky Botterman, Bram Bourgonjon, Vincent Brouillard, Yannick Courtin, Joke De Buck, Philip R Debruyne, Martine Delaat, Jean-Michel Delperdange, Lionel Duck, Els Everaert, Caroline Lamot, Stéphane Holbrechts, Dominique Lossignol, Francis Krekelbergh, Christine Langenaeken, Lore Lapeire, Eline Naert, Koen Lauwers, Milica Matic, Jeroen Mebis, Geertje Miedema, Michèle Pieterbourg, Barbara Plehiers, Kevin Punie, Françoise Roblain, Dirk Schrijvers, Charles-Henri Serre, Katherine Vandenborre, Anne Vanden Broecke, Heidi Van den Bulk, Ludo Vanopdenbosch, Florence Van Ryckeghem, Jolanda Verheezen, Vincent Verschaeve, Mia Voordeckers, Jean Klastersky
{"title":"Evaluating pain management practices for cancer patients among health professionals in cancer and supportive/palliative care units: a Belgian survey.","authors":"Christel Fontaine, Isabelle Libert, Marie-Aline Echterbille, Vincent Bonhomme, Jacky Botterman, Bram Bourgonjon, Vincent Brouillard, Yannick Courtin, Joke De Buck, Philip R Debruyne, Martine Delaat, Jean-Michel Delperdange, Lionel Duck, Els Everaert, Caroline Lamot, Stéphane Holbrechts, Dominique Lossignol, Francis Krekelbergh, Christine Langenaeken, Lore Lapeire, Eline Naert, Koen Lauwers, Milica Matic, Jeroen Mebis, Geertje Miedema, Michèle Pieterbourg, Barbara Plehiers, Kevin Punie, Françoise Roblain, Dirk Schrijvers, Charles-Henri Serre, Katherine Vandenborre, Anne Vanden Broecke, Heidi Van den Bulk, Ludo Vanopdenbosch, Florence Van Ryckeghem, Jolanda Verheezen, Vincent Verschaeve, Mia Voordeckers, Jean Klastersky","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08984-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is reported in 66% of cancer patients with advanced disease. Adequate pain management is a cornerstone of comprehensive supportive cancer care.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess pain management in Oncology Units in Belgium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive research design was applied. A structured questionnaire developed by a writing committee was sent to 37 healthcare professionals in 2021. Twenty-four replied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most centers, pain management is organized through the pain clinic (91.7%), followed by a multidisciplinary team (83.3%) and the palliative care unit (75%). Eighty-seven percent use tools to assess the pain, mostly for in-patients. Pain guidelines are applied in 17 centers with the ESMO guidelines being the most often mentioned. Mild to moderate pain is managed with paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and tramadol. All centers handle severe pain with strong opioids, including buprenorphine and fentanyl. Only 62% are concerned about the side effects of strong opioids. In case of neuropathic pain, treatments with pregabalin, gabapentine, and tricyclic antidepressants are the most common, followed by opioids and interventional therapies for refractory neuropathic pain. Asking advice to the pain clinic, combination therapy and opioid rotation are used for patients with inadequate analgesia. Eighty to 90% of the centers have access to intraspinal and epidural techniques, respectively. An active teaching program on pain relief is offered in 66%, but only 33% of the centers do active research focused on pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first survey on pain management in the Belgian centers. Surprisingly only one-third of the health professionals ask advice to the pain clinic in case of inadequate pain relief, meaning that we are far away from a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach. Therefore, the BSMO Supportive Care Task Force promotes the development of an interdisciplinary committee in every oncology unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08984-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is reported in 66% of cancer patients with advanced disease. Adequate pain management is a cornerstone of comprehensive supportive cancer care.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess pain management in Oncology Units in Belgium.

Methods: A descriptive research design was applied. A structured questionnaire developed by a writing committee was sent to 37 healthcare professionals in 2021. Twenty-four replied.

Results: In most centers, pain management is organized through the pain clinic (91.7%), followed by a multidisciplinary team (83.3%) and the palliative care unit (75%). Eighty-seven percent use tools to assess the pain, mostly for in-patients. Pain guidelines are applied in 17 centers with the ESMO guidelines being the most often mentioned. Mild to moderate pain is managed with paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and tramadol. All centers handle severe pain with strong opioids, including buprenorphine and fentanyl. Only 62% are concerned about the side effects of strong opioids. In case of neuropathic pain, treatments with pregabalin, gabapentine, and tricyclic antidepressants are the most common, followed by opioids and interventional therapies for refractory neuropathic pain. Asking advice to the pain clinic, combination therapy and opioid rotation are used for patients with inadequate analgesia. Eighty to 90% of the centers have access to intraspinal and epidural techniques, respectively. An active teaching program on pain relief is offered in 66%, but only 33% of the centers do active research focused on pain management.

Conclusions: This is the first survey on pain management in the Belgian centers. Surprisingly only one-third of the health professionals ask advice to the pain clinic in case of inadequate pain relief, meaning that we are far away from a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach. Therefore, the BSMO Supportive Care Task Force promotes the development of an interdisciplinary committee in every oncology unit.

评估癌症和支持/姑息治疗科室医护人员对癌症患者的疼痛管理方法:比利时调查。
背景66%的晚期癌症患者都会感到疼痛。目的:本研究旨在评估比利时肿瘤科的疼痛管理情况:方法:采用描述性研究设计。方法: 采用描述性研究设计,向 2021 年的 37 名医护人员发送了由编写委员会编制的结构化问卷。结果:大多数中心都对疼痛管理进行了规划:在大多数中心,疼痛管理是通过疼痛门诊(91.7%)组织的,其次是多学科团队(83.3%)和姑息治疗病房(75%)。87%的中心使用工具来评估疼痛,主要针对住院病人。17个中心采用了疼痛指南,其中最常提及的是ESMO指南。轻度至中度疼痛可使用扑热息痛、非甾体抗炎药和曲马多。所有中心都使用包括丁丙诺啡和芬太尼在内的强效阿片类药物治疗重度疼痛。只有 62% 的人担心强效阿片类药物的副作用。对于神经病理性疼痛,普瑞巴林、加巴喷丁和三环类抗抑郁药是最常见的治疗方法,其次是阿片类药物和治疗难治性神经病理性疼痛的介入疗法。向疼痛诊所咨询后,镇痛效果不佳的患者可采用联合疗法和阿片类药物轮换疗法。80%到90%的中心分别可以使用椎管内和硬膜外技术。66%的中心提供积极的镇痛教学计划,但只有33%的中心积极开展以疼痛治疗为重点的研究:这是首次对比利时中心的疼痛管理进行调查。令人惊讶的是,只有三分之一的医疗专业人员会在疼痛缓解不充分的情况下向疼痛诊所提出建议,这意味着我们离以患者为中心的多学科方法还很遥远。因此,BSMO 支持性治疗工作组提倡在每个肿瘤科成立一个跨学科委员会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信