Outcomes after a virological failure to first-line second-generation INSTI-based therapy in a real-life setting.

Abstract

Background: Virological failures of first-line second-generation (SG) INSTI-based regimens are rare, usually characterized by low viremia and absence of drug resistance mutations.

Objectives: To explore the efficacy of rescue regimens introduced after virological failure (VF) to a first-line SG-INSTI therapy.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study on people living with HIV (PWH) failing a first-line SG-INSTI regimen [DTG/3TC, BIC/FTC/TAF, DTG-based three-drug regimen (DTG-3DR)] between 24 March 2016 and 31 December 2021. Follow-up accrued from the second viral load (VL) ≥ 50 copies/mL under SG-INSTI regimen (baseline) until virological success (VS, achievement of at least one VL < 50 copies/mL after baseline) or last visit. Cumulative probabilities of VS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using a log-rank test.

Results: Overall, of 521 naïve PWH who started a first-line SG-INSTI regimen, 45 (8.6%) had VF after a median of 14.9 (IQR = 6.9-25.9) months: 33/395 (8.4%) individuals failed a DTG-3DR, 11/102 (10.8%) a BIC/FTC/TAF and 1/24 (4.2%) failed a DTG/3TC.At baseline, 12/45 (27%) PWH changed antiretroviral therapy [median baseline VL 134 (IQR = 81-233) copies/mL], while 33 (73%) maintained their failing regimen [median baseline VL 75 (IQR = 60-145) copies/mL].During a median follow-up of 5.13 (IQR = 3.8-7.1) months, 34 (75.6%) PWH achieved VS: 25/33 (75.8%) maintaining their failing regimen, 9/12 (75%) switched regimen; the estimated 6- and 12-months probabilities of VS were 59% and 84%, respectively.There was no difference in VS curves between PWH who maintained their failing regimen and those who switched therapy.

Conclusions: Most individuals remained on their failing regimen, achieving spontaneous virological suppression in most cases. These data help to understand a real-life VF scenario in the context of the current SG-INSTI era.