Simulated synapse loss induces depression-like behaviors in deep reinforcement learning.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fncom.2024.1466364
Eric Chalmers, Santina Duarte, Xena Al-Hejji, Daniel Devoe, Aaron Gruber, Robert J McDonald
{"title":"Simulated synapse loss induces depression-like behaviors in deep reinforcement learning.","authors":"Eric Chalmers, Santina Duarte, Xena Al-Hejji, Daniel Devoe, Aaron Gruber, Robert J McDonald","doi":"10.3389/fncom.2024.1466364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep Reinforcement Learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that uses artificial neural networks to model reward-based learning as it occurs in biological agents. Here we modify a Deep Reinforcement Learning approach by imposing a suppressive effect on the connections between neurons in the artificial network-simulating the effect of dendritic spine loss as observed in major depressive disorder (MDD). Surprisingly, this simulated spine loss is sufficient to induce a variety of MDD-like behaviors in the artificially intelligent agent, including anhedonia, increased temporal discounting, avoidance, and an altered exploration/exploitation balance. Furthermore, simulating alternative and longstanding reward-processing-centric conceptions of MDD (dysfunction of the dopamine system, altered reward discounting, context-dependent learning rates, increased exploration) does not produce the same range of MDD-like behaviors. These results support a conceptual model of MDD as a reduction of brain connectivity (and thus information-processing capacity) rather than an imbalance in monoamines-though the computational model suggests a possible explanation for the dysfunction of dopamine systems in MDD. Reversing the spine-loss effect in our computational MDD model can lead to rescue of rewarding behavior under some conditions. This supports the search for treatments that increase plasticity and synaptogenesis, and the model suggests some implications for their effective administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12363,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1466364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2024.1466364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep Reinforcement Learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that uses artificial neural networks to model reward-based learning as it occurs in biological agents. Here we modify a Deep Reinforcement Learning approach by imposing a suppressive effect on the connections between neurons in the artificial network-simulating the effect of dendritic spine loss as observed in major depressive disorder (MDD). Surprisingly, this simulated spine loss is sufficient to induce a variety of MDD-like behaviors in the artificially intelligent agent, including anhedonia, increased temporal discounting, avoidance, and an altered exploration/exploitation balance. Furthermore, simulating alternative and longstanding reward-processing-centric conceptions of MDD (dysfunction of the dopamine system, altered reward discounting, context-dependent learning rates, increased exploration) does not produce the same range of MDD-like behaviors. These results support a conceptual model of MDD as a reduction of brain connectivity (and thus information-processing capacity) rather than an imbalance in monoamines-though the computational model suggests a possible explanation for the dysfunction of dopamine systems in MDD. Reversing the spine-loss effect in our computational MDD model can lead to rescue of rewarding behavior under some conditions. This supports the search for treatments that increase plasticity and synaptogenesis, and the model suggests some implications for their effective administration.

在深度强化学习中,模拟突触丢失会诱发类似抑郁的行为。
深度强化学习(Deep Reinforcement Learning)是人工智能的一个分支,它使用人工神经网络来模拟生物体内发生的基于奖励的学习。在这里,我们对深度强化学习方法进行了修改,对人工网络中神经元之间的连接施加了抑制效应--模拟在重度抑郁症(MDD)中观察到的树突棘缺失效应。令人惊讶的是,这种模拟的树突棘缺失足以在人工智能代理中诱发各种类似 MDD 的行为,包括失神、时间折扣增加、回避和探索/开发平衡的改变。此外,模拟以奖赏处理为中心的 MDD 的其他长期概念(多巴胺系统功能障碍、奖赏折现改变、情境依赖学习率、探索增加)也不会产生相同的 MDD 类行为。这些结果支持将 MDD 视为大脑连通性降低(从而导致信息处理能力下降)而非单胺失衡的概念模型--尽管计算模型为 MDD 中多巴胺系统功能障碍提供了一种可能的解释。在我们的 MDD 计算模型中,逆转脊髓丧失效应可以在某些条件下挽救奖赏行为。这支持了对增加可塑性和突触生成的治疗方法的探索,而该模型也为这些治疗方法的有效应用提供了一些启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to promoting theoretical modeling of brain function and fostering interdisciplinary interactions between theoretical and experimental neuroscience. Progress in understanding the amazing capabilities of the brain is still limited, and we believe that it will only come with deep theoretical thinking and mutually stimulating cooperation between different disciplines and approaches. We therefore invite original contributions on a wide range of topics that present the fruits of such cooperation, or provide stimuli for future alliances. We aim to provide an interactive forum for cutting-edge theoretical studies of the nervous system, and for promulgating the best theoretical research to the broader neuroscience community. Models of all styles and at all levels are welcome, from biophysically motivated realistic simulations of neurons and synapses to high-level abstract models of inference and decision making. While the journal is primarily focused on theoretically based and driven research, we welcome experimental studies that validate and test theoretical conclusions. Also: comp neuro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信