Wide surgical margins may be necessary to reduce recurrence and mortality in patients with localized periosteal chondrosarcoma: retrospective analysis of twenty three patients and literature meta-analysis.
{"title":"Wide surgical margins may be necessary to reduce recurrence and mortality in patients with localized periosteal chondrosarcoma: retrospective analysis of twenty three patients and literature meta-analysis.","authors":"Tomoya Masunaga, Shinji Tsukamoto, Kanya Honoki, Hiromasa Fujii, Yuu Tanaka, Yukako Ishida, Yasuhito Tanaka, Andreas Mavrogenis, Costantino Errani, Akira Kawai","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06371-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periosteal chondrosarcoma (PCS) is the rarest subtype of chondrosarcoma and is recognized as a low-grade malignant tumour, reported to have an 88% ten year overall survival rate. The relationship between surgical margins and clinical outcome is inconsistent; some authors claim that PCS can be successfully treated with marginal resection and others report more local recurrence and distant metastasis with marginal compared to wide resection. This study was intended to report the treatment and prognosis of localized PCS patients from the Japanese National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry database and to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationship between surgical margins and rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients with pathologically-diagnosed PCS between 2006 and 2022 from the Japanese National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry database were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 105 studies found through a systematic search using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, nine studies were ultimately included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local recurrence rate after R0 resection was 2.5% (3/118 patients) and after R1 resection was 33.3% (11/33 patients) (p < 0.001). The distant metastasis rate in the R0 resection group was 5.9% (7/118 patients) and in the R1 resection group was 27.3% (9/33 patients) (p = 0.010). Mortality following R0 resection was 4.2% (5/118 patients) but after R1 resection was 18.2% (6/33 patients) (p = 0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wide resection may be necessary for localized PCS to prevent local recurrence and distant metastasis and improve survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"279-288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06371-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Periosteal chondrosarcoma (PCS) is the rarest subtype of chondrosarcoma and is recognized as a low-grade malignant tumour, reported to have an 88% ten year overall survival rate. The relationship between surgical margins and clinical outcome is inconsistent; some authors claim that PCS can be successfully treated with marginal resection and others report more local recurrence and distant metastasis with marginal compared to wide resection. This study was intended to report the treatment and prognosis of localized PCS patients from the Japanese National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry database and to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the relationship between surgical margins and rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and mortality.
Methods: Twenty-three patients with pathologically-diagnosed PCS between 2006 and 2022 from the Japanese National Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry database were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 105 studies found through a systematic search using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, nine studies were ultimately included.
Results: The local recurrence rate after R0 resection was 2.5% (3/118 patients) and after R1 resection was 33.3% (11/33 patients) (p < 0.001). The distant metastasis rate in the R0 resection group was 5.9% (7/118 patients) and in the R1 resection group was 27.3% (9/33 patients) (p = 0.010). Mortality following R0 resection was 4.2% (5/118 patients) but after R1 resection was 18.2% (6/33 patients) (p = 0.040).
Conclusion: Wide resection may be necessary for localized PCS to prevent local recurrence and distant metastasis and improve survival.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.